• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A wife attempts to publicly shame her successful husband into minimum wage tasks

SDET

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2015
Messages
7,802
Reaction score
1,610
Location
Texas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
My one problem with mom's viral letter begging her husband for more help - Chicago Tribune

What if those fathers choose not to? If Mizz Erlach wants help, I suggest that she visit Care dot com and find someone. Distracting a breadwinner from building a career is just plain stupid. Remember that women generally don't marry down. How many female attorneys or physicians do you see married to plumbers, auto mechanics or roofers? It borders on abuse to "wage nag" a husband to do put in whatever effort is needed to advance in his career, then publicly shame him for not doing domestic tasks.

When women start being willing to "marry down", then maybe discussing "gender equality" at home can be a reasonable discussion.


Babies and toddlers have a whole lot of needs. Dads have a vested interest in those needs being met. So why is meeting them considered “helping” their mother?

We’re going to have a hard time achieving gender equity at home if we continue to frame child care as a mother’s load, which fathers can lighten should they choose.

How much do you want do bet that her husband will divorce her right after the kids turn 18?

 
Last edited:
I'm wondering whether you read/listened to what you linked. Where does the "wage-nagging" come from? The "shaming for not doing domestic tasks"?

Where your hostility is coming from, I'm not sure, but I am absolutely certain that helping take care of your own children isn't "minimum-wage work."
 
There are lots of women out there who have had no choice but to get used to their men being retired long before planned....usually for good reason.

My wife is one....plus I spent ten years as a stay at home dad....because that is what made sense, wife a workaholic, was a soldier, oft deployed.

Plus I was a feminist once upon a time, hanging out with dyke radicals (That's what they called themselves, dont be giving me ****).

I never got into the toxic masculinity that shamed all who do not bring home the bacon.
 
I'm wondering whether you read/listened to what you linked. Where does the "wage-nagging" come from? The "shaming for not doing domestic tasks"?

Where your hostility is coming from, I'm not sure, but I am absolutely certain that helping take care of your own children isn't "minimum-wage work."

The above comes from watching what American women do to their husbands. Many expect their husbands to bring home a GOOD six-figure salary AND help with the housework.
 
The above comes from watching what American women do to their husbands. Many expect their husbands to bring home a GOOD six-figure salary AND help with the housework.

And/or pay servants/contractors to do it.....but where has all this gotten women.....they are the least happy they have been in decades.

Maybe the feminists got something wrong?

?
 
I'm wondering whether you read/listened to what you linked. Where does the "wage-nagging" come from? The "shaming for not doing domestic tasks"?

Where your hostility is coming from, I'm not sure, but I am absolutely certain that helping take care of your own children isn't "minimum-wage work."

You took the words right off my fingers. You go, girl!
 
The above comes from watching what American women do to their husbands. Many expect their husbands to bring home a GOOD six-figure salary AND help with the housework.

And? Why is it the woman's job to make sure everything is perfect for Ward Cleaver when he comes home from the office? Most women work outside the home, take care of the kids, cook, clean and do laundry. Why is it expected of her to do all this (and work) while the man comes home, props up his feet and turns on the game?

Why is it OK to distract her from her career? She has just as much right to build her career as he does, and should equally expect help from him when he gets home. Most women like myself would appreciate any help. My husband is old-school. His mother never worked outside the home, so he expects me to do everything, while he does nothing. Every now and then he surprises me, and does the dishes, or washes a load of clothes, but for the most part, he does nothing unless I get frustrated and ask him to, and by that point, it usually turns into an argument.

Marriage is a partnership - in all ways. You partner to raise the kids, you partner financially on the bills, and the you should partner to help each other with everything else as well.
 
I don't much are to comment on other people's relationships and how they conduct them.

I will say that things like the apportionment of tasks strikes me as one of those things that each party to a couple should have figured out and decided s/he could "live with" before saying "I do."
  • When your girl-/boyfriend arrives home each day and expects that you'd have "dinner and slippers" ready, that should tell you something.
  • When your girl-/boyfriend lets dirty dishes and/or trash pile up and you are the one who has to deal with it, that should tell you something.
Those are but two examples, and the point is there are signs; there's "writing on the wall," as it were. It's one's obligation to one self, assuming one has any self-respect, to read and heed the "writing on the wall."

Though the situation differs, my thoughts about this matter are no different than the core thoughts I expressed just yesterday in a different thread. When "stuff's" staring one in the face, one is well advised not to disregard it. When one's better judgment says "this isn't a good idea," listen.

Yes, the woman is in a messed-up situation/marriage and she needs to do something, but publicly shaming her husband isn't it. That reflects just as poorly on her as it does on him for it ensures we all now know: he's probably a jerk and she's definitely an idiot. How can our knowing those things be a good thing for either of them? By my reckoning, it's not.


Frankly, IMO, they belong together. Hell. Their being married likely has saved at least someone from having to put up with him or her. I mean, really. Knowing what you now know, would you wed either of them? As my kinfolks say, they're both so pathetic I wouldn't screw either of 'em with your "willy."
 
I wonder how many people approve of this verses how many people approved of parents making kids walk to school because they missed the bus in the rain I believe as they followed in a car and recorded it and put it up on the internet....a shaming much like the whipping through the streets of old.....and all of the other parents cutting down their kids and then broadcasting the news.....often to great cheers.

There is something wrong with America.
 
Yes, the woman is in a messed-up situation/marriage and she needs to do something, but publicly shaming her husband isn't it. That reflects just as poorly on her as it does on him for it ensures we all now know: he's probably a jerk and she's definitely an idiot. How can our knowing those things be a good thing for either of them? By my reckoning, it's not.


Frankly, IMO, they belong together. Hell. Their being married likely has saved at least someone from having to put up with him or her. I mean, really. Knowing what you now know, would you wed either of them? As my kinfolks say, they're both so pathetic I wouldn't screw either of 'em with your "willy."

Well I think that in the letter, she says that he's a great husband and father, but she just needed some help on some other tasks from time to time. In the video, it seems like they worked through it as well, so I don't know if anyone was a "jerk" per say. I do think that perhaps we're too quick to post things on the internet, and usually when that's done we're only getting one side of the story. And in this case, it was a "story" that was really nothing of the public's business. In this case, things seemed to work out, but I could see how even a good dad/husband who would most certainly work with his wife and communicate may be put on the defensive by their dirty laundry being shared all over the internet. There could be some backlash, perhaps some additional stress in his work place because everyone sees this stuff. So probably it was best to just talk, and she said in the video when they sat down and talked about it they both realized things the other was experiencing that they did not realize.

There's a lot of necessity for communication in a relationship, spreading personal family affairs all over the internet may not be the best way to solve it. Seems like it worked out here, so that's good. But if the communication did work, it would seem that it would likely have been best to have tried that first before turning to the internet.
 
I don't much are to comment on other people's relationships and how they conduct them.

I will say that things like the apportionment of tasks strikes me as one of those things that each party to a couple should have figured out and decided s/he could "live with" before saying "I do."
  • When your girl-/boyfriend arrives home each day and expects that you'd have "dinner and slippers" ready, that should tell you something.
  • When your girl-/boyfriend lets dirty dishes and/or trash pile up and you are the one who has to deal with it, that should tell you something.
Those are but two examples, and the point is there are signs; there's "writing on the wall," as it were. It's one's obligation to one self, assuming one has any self-respect, to read and heed the "writing on the wall."

Though the situation differs, my thoughts about this matter are no different than the core thoughts I expressed just yesterday in a different thread. When "stuff's" staring one in the face, one is well advised not to disregard it. When one's better judgment says "this isn't a good idea," listen.

Yes, the woman is in a messed-up situation/marriage and she needs to do something, but publicly shaming her husband isn't it. That reflects just as poorly on her as it does on him for it ensures we all now know: he's probably a jerk and she's definitely an idiot. How can our knowing those things be a good thing for either of them? By my reckoning, it's not.


Frankly, IMO, they belong together. Hell. Their being married likely has saved at least someone from having to put up with him or her. I mean, really. Knowing what you now know, would you wed either of them? As my kinfolks say, they're both so pathetic I wouldn't screw either of 'em with your "willy."

:lol:
 
Well I think that in the letter, she says that he's a great husband and father, but she just needed some help on some other tasks from time to time. In the video, it seems like they worked through it as well, so I don't know if anyone was a "jerk" per say. I do think that perhaps we're too quick to post things on the internet, and usually when that's done we're only getting one side of the story. And in this case, it was a "story" that was really nothing of the public's business. In this case, things seemed to work out, but I could see how even a good dad/husband who would most certainly work with his wife and communicate may be put on the defensive by their dirty laundry being shared all over the internet. There could be some backlash, perhaps some additional stress in his work place because everyone sees this stuff. So probably it was best to just talk, and she said in the video when they sat down and talked about it they both realized things the other was experiencing that they did not realize.

There's a lot of necessity for communication in a relationship, spreading personal family affairs all over the internet may not be the best way to solve it. Seems like it worked out here, so that's good. But if the communication did work, it would seem that it would likely have been best to have tried that first before turning to the internet.

One of the main rules in my house is that dirty laundry is not shared online. Period. What happens at Casa de Superfly, stays at Casa de Superfly.
 
Well I think that in the letter, she says that he's a great husband and father, but she just needed some help on some other tasks from time to time. In the video, it seems like they worked through it as well, so I don't know if anyone was a "jerk" per say. I do think that perhaps we're too quick to post things on the internet, and usually when that's done we're only getting one side of the story. And in this case, it was a "story" that was really nothing of the public's business. In this case, things seemed to work out, but I could see how even a good dad/husband who would most certainly work with his wife and communicate may be put on the defensive by their dirty laundry being shared all over the internet. There could be some backlash, perhaps some additional stress in his work place because everyone sees this stuff. So probably it was best to just talk, and she said in the video when they sat down and talked about it they both realized things the other was experiencing that they did not realize.

There's a lot of necessity for communication in a relationship, spreading personal family affairs all over the internet may not be the best way to solve it. Seems like it worked out here, so that's good. But if the communication did work, it would seem that it would likely have been best to have tried that first before turning to the internet.

As I recall, she did have the talk with her hubs before putting the "open letter" on the 'Net, and she says in the video that their conversation was fruitful and eye-opening for both of them.

You can and should talk about the important issues before marrying and come to an understanding. But here's the thing: What has worked for just the two of you is pretty likely not to work when you have a helpless third who needs attention 24/7.
 
What the heck?
 
Well I think that in the letter, she says that he's a great husband and father, but she just needed some help on some other tasks from time to time. In the video, it seems like they worked through it as well, so I don't know if anyone was a "jerk" per say. I do think that perhaps we're too quick to post things on the internet, and usually when that's done we're only getting one side of the story. And in this case, it was a "story" that was really nothing of the public's business.
Fair enough. I did post my earlier remarks too quickly. I see now the Trib says:
She writes in a follow-up blog post that she originally penned the letter more than a year ago and only shared it publicly after a heart-to-heart with her husband, during which they came up with a more equal division of labor. “I decided to publish this letter after we had settled into our new routine,” she writes. “I believed it would help other women speak their truths. I hoped it would serve as a catalyst for change for women who are struggling; breaking like I was.”

Be that as it may, from where I sit, airing one's intramarital/household dirty laundry on the Internet is a stupid move, however well intentioned it be. Her spouse didn't mind, and where I sit isn't in their marriage, so whatever. They can air whatever of their dirty laundry they want.

In this case, things seemed to work out, but I could see how even a good dad/husband who would most certainly work with his wife and communicate may be put on the defensive by their dirty laundry being shared all over the internet. There could be some backlash, perhaps some additional stress in his work place because everyone sees this stuff. So probably it was best to just talk, and she said in the video when they sat down and talked about it they both realized things the other was experiencing that they did not realize.

There's a lot of necessity for communication in a relationship, spreading personal family affairs all over the internet may not be the best way to solve it. Seems like it worked out here, so that's good. But if the communication did work, it would seem that it would likely have been best to have tried that first before turning to the internet.

Frank and open communication is the key to any relationship, be it marital or otherwise.


Off-Topic:
The couple have two children. I'm not sure whether she felt overburdened in the absolute or overburdened relative to the fact that she has a spouse who wasn't helping enough as she felt he should. She wrote:​

Part of me feels like a failure for even asking. I mean, you do help. You are an amazing father, and you do a great job with the kids. And besides, this should come easy to me, right? Motherly instincts, no? But I’m human, and I’m running on five hours of sleep and tired as hell. I need you.​

Whichever form of overload she felt, it was what it was. What crossed my mind was my own and my wife's circumstances raising four kids. My career caused me to be out of town M-Th/F during pretty much all four of their infancy and toddlerhood. My wife had a "bring work home" career just as I did. My wife passed when our youngest was eight and the oldest fourteen.

Now, I'm not sitting here thinking something like "she felt overburdened...try having four, you whiney woman." I'm thinking she has a husband whom she describes as helping to some extent, yet there are many single parents who have no help at all, yet they find a way to raise their kids. That's why I wrote I'm unsure of the context of her sense of overload.

I'm not denying that she felt overworked; she said she felt that way, so I believe she did feel that way, and being a parent, I'm sure she did feel like parenting is a lot of work because it is, regardless of how many kids one has. But reading her letter and watching her video, I could not help but think her a "snowflake," for lack right now of a better term. Her husband's inadequate contributions notwithstanding, she seems like she has it pretty good, and she was still fussing. So my uncertainty about the nature of her sense of overload is me giving her the benefit of the doubt, me hoping her complaint is borne of the relative langor her husband exhibited rather than of her just feeling she was overworked in the absolute.​
 
There are lots of women out there who have had no choice but to get used to their men being retired long before planned....usually for good reason.

My wife is one....plus I spent ten years as a stay at home dad....because that is what made sense, wife a workaholic, was a soldier, oft deployed.

Plus I was a feminist once upon a time, hanging out with dyke radicals (That's what they called themselves, dont be giving me ****).

I never got into the toxic masculinity that shamed all who do not bring home the bacon.

I know several guys who earn less money than their wives. They are actually happier than the rest of us.
 
And? Why is it the woman's job to make sure everything is perfect for Ward Cleaver when he comes home from the office? Most women work outside the home, take care of the kids, cook, clean and do laundry. Why is it expected of her to do all this (and work) while the man comes home, props up his feet and turns on the game?

Why is it OK to distract her from her career? She has just as much right to build her career as he does, and should equally expect help from him when he gets home. Most women like myself would appreciate any help. My husband is old-school. His mother never worked outside the home, so he expects me to do everything, while he does nothing. Every now and then he surprises me, and does the dishes, or washes a load of clothes, but for the most part, he does nothing unless I get frustrated and ask him to, and by that point, it usually turns into an argument.

Marriage is a partnership - in all ways. You partner to raise the kids, you partner financially on the bills, and the you should partner to help each other with everything else as well.

Your premise falls apart when women "marry up". A woman looks for a man who earns more than she does, which according to the market means that he is working harder and/or smarter. Then she wants every thing to be equal. There's a word for that: predatory. And yes wage nagging is a thing.

Obviously, hiring outside help is not an option for two reasons: 1) In many cases the wife's career doesn't bring in enough money to hire outside help. 2) She might have to drive a used car instead of a luxury car and that just won't do.
 
Last edited:
Well I think that in the letter, she says that he's a great husband and father, but she just needed some help on some other tasks from time to time. In the video, it seems like they worked through it as well, so I don't know if anyone was a "jerk" per say. I do think that perhaps we're too quick to post things on the internet, and usually when that's done we're only getting one side of the story. And in this case, it was a "story" that was really nothing of the public's business. In this case, things seemed to work out, but I could see how even a good dad/husband who would most certainly work with his wife and communicate may be put on the defensive by their dirty laundry being shared all over the internet. There could be some backlash, perhaps some additional stress in his work place because everyone sees this stuff. So probably it was best to just talk, and she said in the video when they sat down and talked about it they both realized things the other was experiencing that they did not realize.

There's a lot of necessity for communication in a relationship, spreading personal family affairs all over the internet may not be the best way to solve it. Seems like it worked out here, so that's good. But if the communication did work, it would seem that it would likely have been best to have tried that first before turning to the internet.

In life there are people who no matter what you do, it's never enough. Whether it's a boss, spouse or other relative that is like that, it's important to recognize the zero return on investment and stop trying altogether.

Let's not forget that the husband hasn't been heard from at all. It's possible that he knows how the court system works and realizes how important it is to stay obedient until his kids turn 18. If his wife makes an hour-by-hour list with 168 weekly entries how where he should be and what he should be doing, he should probably obey it unless he wants to be a visitor instead of a father.
 
Last edited:
Your premise falls apart when women "marry up". A woman looks for a man who earns more than she does, which according to the market means that he is working harder and/or smarter. Then she wants every thing to be equal. There's a word for that: predatory. And yes wage nagging is a thing.

Obviously, hiring outside help is not an option for two reasons: 1) In many cases the wife's career doesn't bring in enough money to hire outside help. 2) She might have to drive a used car instead of a luxury car and that just won't do.

You got me at "predatory." Or, rather, I "get" you now.
 
My one problem with mom's viral letter begging her husband for more help - Chicago Tribune

What if those fathers choose not to? If Mizz Erlach wants help, I suggest that she visit Care dot com and find someone. Distracting a breadwinner from building a career is just plain stupid. Remember that women generally don't marry down. How many female attorneys or physicians do you see married to plumbers, auto mechanics or roofers? It borders on abuse to "wage nag" a husband to do put in whatever effort is needed to advance in his career, then publicly shame him for not doing domestic tasks.

When women start being willing to "marry down", then maybe discussing "gender equality" at home can be a reasonable discussion.




How much do you want do bet that her husband will divorce her right after the kids turn 18?



Parents get stressed when they have toddlers, babies and lack of sleep. In other news water is wet.
 
Your premise falls apart when women "marry up". A woman looks for a man who earns more than she does, which according to the market means that he is working harder and/or smarter. Then she wants every thing to be equal. There's a word for that: predatory. And yes wage nagging is a thing.

Obviously, hiring outside help is not an option for two reasons: 1) In many cases the wife's career doesn't bring in enough money to hire outside help. 2) She might have to drive a used car instead of a luxury car and that just won't do.

Do you really have to work to be this sexist, or does it come naturally?

Or did you have a really bad experience with an ex-wife who took your ass to the cleaners?

That's the vibe I am getting.
 
As I recall, she did have the talk with her hubs before putting the "open letter" on the 'Net, and she says in the video that their conversation was fruitful and eye-opening for both of them.

You can and should talk about the important issues before marrying and come to an understanding. But here's the thing: What has worked for just the two of you is pretty likely not to work when you have a helpless third who needs attention 24/7.

Yeah, what SDET doesn't understand is that people change. When my husband and I got together, he had his own place, and I had mine. We both had laundry, houses to clean, kids to raise, etc. When we got together, we combined the household chores. He never had issue with doing anything at all. Then he got sick and had to have surgery. While he was recuperating, of course I did everything. Once he got better, he realized how cool it was that I was doing everything, so he just let me continue. I usually don't have a problem doing it, because I just like the way I clean better. But when I'm busy, with lots of things going on, and I come home to no clean towels or a sink full of dishes, I get pissed.
 
Yeah, what SDET doesn't understand is that people change. When my husband and I got together, he had his own place, and I had mine. We both had laundry, houses to clean, kids to raise, etc. When we got together, we combined the household chores. He never had issue with doing anything at all. Then he got sick and had to have surgery. While he was recuperating, of course I did everything. Once he got better, he realized how cool it was that I was doing everything, so he just let me continue. I usually don't have a problem doing it, because I just like the way I clean better. But when I'm busy, with lots of things going on, and I come home to no clean towels or a sink full of dishes, I get pissed.

Towels need cleaning? :shock:

We worked it out in our house. I don't like the way she cooks so I do all the cooking/grocery shopping. She doesn't like the way I clean bathrooms or do laundry so she does those. :lol:
 
Yeah, what SDET doesn't understand is that people change. When my husband and I got together, he had his own place, and I had mine. We both had laundry, houses to clean, kids to raise, etc. When we got together, we combined the household chores. He never had issue with doing anything at all. Then he got sick and had to have surgery. While he was recuperating, of course I did everything. Once he got better, he realized how cool it was that I was doing everything, so he just let me continue. I usually don't have a problem doing it, because I just like the way I clean better. But when I'm busy, with lots of things going on, and I come home to no clean towels or a sink full of dishes, I get pissed.

Exactly. I usually don't have a problem doing stuff because I like the way I do things and also because I want them done in my lifetime. But when I've left the house with an empty sink and come home to a sinkful--and seriously, you can't rinse out your coffee cup or use a spoon holder when there are TWO right there by the coffeepot?!--it pisses me off. And don't even get me started on laundry.
 
The above comes from watching what American women do to their husbands. Many expect their husbands to bring home a GOOD six-figure salary AND help with the housework.

I'm not sure where you live, but in most of the nation, women work too, and many earn just as much as their husbands. I haven't seen a real stay-at-home-mom in a long time. I'm also not clear on the women "marrying up" thing. While it's true that similarities attract, so nurses marry doctors more often than they marry ditch-diggers, the nurses today are often male while the doctors are female.

Rather than assign domestic tasks based on salaries, I think it'd be better to assign them based on which spouse is free at the time the task needs to be completed. If the wife leaves earlier for work, the husband can take the kids to the sitter, while the wife can pick them up. If one only works part time, that one should reasonably be expected to do more of the domestic tasks. But, when both are at home, neither one should be sitting in front of the TV while the other one is walking the floor with a crying baby. Both need to put in their time to make the household work, and both need some down time to get some sleep.
 
Back
Top Bottom