Because he's not said anything in an inappropriate manner yet. He's not been any worse than some of the so called Christians here that haven't been banned.
Well you had to because that was the article title you cited. Better to say that you should have used a different article.
Psst. A scholar of climate based on AGW is an oxymoron too.
As I said, it's nothing more than I've seen some Christians post and not.get infractions for.
That's rather like noting they conquered the world with swords and not firearms. The anchronistic comparison is pretty much a strawman.
That is contingent on what makes a skirt a skirt to begin with, of course. So what is it? The name, the fabric, the culture, the color, the contour - one or more of the above?
At which point did one or the other or both wear such and such a type, and for what, why, how? Wearing a tuxedo, a bathrobe, a burqua, a baseball cap... is not done in isolation from the other externals and variables which beget the very decision to wear such a garment to begin with.
Social assumptions predicate the designing of clothing clothing to begin with, much as the assumption that a woman has breasts predicates the designing of a bra - if a woman had no breasts, the idea to design a bra to begin with likely never would have occurred.
