• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ru Paul stepped on the old crank but good.

I don't pay a whole lot of attention to that sort of thing because my sexual orientation does not drive my politics. The other gay people I know don't really talk about politics. So I only know what I hear.


I'm firmly with Laci Green and I would say she's feminist by dictionary definition but not by the social definition. Frankly I believe in equality of the Sexes so by dictionary definition anybody who does is a feminist.

Read The Verge from feminism is one day talk about male privilege and how many to acquiesce so that they can speak up to me that's anti-feminism. Because it doesn't see women as equal it sees them as needing men to do something in order for them to have equality.

And I will Guild on this because for whatever reason the most outlandish people who claim to be this or that are the ones who get the most attention.

So sure they clearly wouldn't represent all of feminism I would think it's strange to hold on to that title after it's been sullied. But that's just semantics.

I... am not sure what's going on with your basically indecipherable grammar here, but I tried my best...

If you, by your own admission, don't pay any attention to it, I honestly don't think you're very qualified to be saying what counts as socially relevant feminism/LGBT activism. Whatever you "hear" is most likely informed by what you want to hear.

Everyone needs to do something for any given rights movement to be successful, unless you think we should just create new sucessionist states for every civil movement that happens. You can't have an equal society where half the people in it don't believe in equality. That's just... a logically obvious fact. So, I mean... yes? Obviously?

Every title on earth has been sullied. There is no category in which humans exist that doesn't have awful people in it. Feminism/LGBT is far less sullied than many far more common labels, to be perfectly honest. There's no label you personally use that you could give me that doesn't have someone in it who's hurt or killed someone, including "man." So... what does this matter?
 
I... am not sure what's going on with your basically indecipherable grammar here, but I tried my best...
I was using text-to-speech and I didn't proof read my apologies.

If you, by your own admission, don't pay any attention to it, I honestly don't think you're very qualified to be saying what counts as socially relevant feminism/LGBT activism. Whatever you "hear" is most likely informed by what you want to hear.
no it's who formed by what I hear.

Everyone needs to do something for any given rights movement to be successful, unless you think we should just create new sucessionist states for every civil movement that happens. You can't have an equal society where half the people in it don't believe in equality. That's just... a logically obvious fact. So, I mean... yes? Obviously?
everyone has equal rights so what is Rights Movement for?

Every title on earth has been sullied. There is no category in which humans exist that doesn't have awful people in it. Feminism/LGBT is far less sullied than many far more common labels, to be perfectly honest. There's no label you personally use that you could give me that doesn't have someone in it who's hurt or killed someone, including "man." So... what does this matter?

When the label means something other than what you wanted to mean it's time to abandon it you don't pick your labels your labels are applied to you. They are not for you to express yourself there for society to understand you and categorize you that's why we label anything.
 
K. A trans women will always be a man regardless of the hormones he takes or surgery he has, same for a trans man.

Would drag king be derogatory ??

Drag kings are women who do male impersonation.
 
No It means you must capitulate or we'll destroy your career. It's the basis for most of LGBTQQAIP2 and feminist activism.

These ass clowns DO NOT speak for me.

Are you LGBTQ or a drag queen?
 
I am homosexual

And you're on Ru Paul's side here? One thing that I'm noticing (maybe I'm off but just what I'm seeing) is that as sexual orientation has become a more normalized issue, those who are LGBTQ have started branching away from the Democrat plantation.
 
I agree with RU 100% but thats only his opinion.

If I was running a DRAG QUEEN show I would never allow anybody to participate but drag queens. So transgender women would be out :shrug:

Transgender =/= drag queen

Now with that said . . .people running other drag shows are free to run them how they want, its theirs.
 
And you're on Ru Paul's side here? One thing that I'm noticing (maybe I'm off but just what I'm seeing) is that as sexual orientation has become a more normalized issue, those who are LGBTQ have started branching away from the Democrat plantation.

I'm on RuPaul's side with regards to trans women can't be drag queens.

I personally never was on the plantation as it were
 
And you're on Ru Paul's side here? One thing that I'm noticing (maybe I'm off but just what I'm seeing) is that as sexual orientation has become a more normalized issue, those who are LGBTQ have started branching away from the Democrat plantation.

If memory serves, Clax has always been as honest as the libertarians come for a loooong time.
 
Back
Top Bottom