• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

First Transgender Woman Able to Breastfeed Baby Without Undergoing Surgery

No it isn't. She took gobs of hormones to do it.

The man who breastfed his babies did not though. So I'm showing that it is possible. And women use those same hormones too to feed their babies when their bodies do not make enough milk.
 
The man who breastfed his babies did not though.
that's irrelevant.
So I'm showing that it is possible.
what is? A trans woman jacked up on hormones can breastfeed her baby?
And women use those same hormones too to feed their babies when their bodies do not make enough milk.
so stuffing those hormones into a baby is good when it's done by a woman that was born a woman so then it's okay for a male who has transitioned?

Does this nonsense make sense in your head because it's not making sense here.

Dosing a baby an infant with hormones is probably not a good idea
 
that's irrelevant. what is? A trans woman jacked up on hormones can breastfeed her baby? so stuffing those hormones into a baby is good when it's done by a woman that was born a woman so then it's okay for a male who has transitioned?

Does this nonsense make sense in your head because it's not making sense here.

Dosing a baby an infant with hormones is probably not a good idea

A woman's body naturally makes hormones that produce that milk. So feeding a baby breastmilk is "dosing" the infant with hormones. It all depends on what the hormones are and how they actually affect the baby. Do you know the answer to this?

And yes, the first part is relevant because it proves that yes, it is possible (even if not likely) for a transwoman to naturally produce breastmilk to feed a baby with.
 
A woman's body naturally makes hormones that produce that milk. So feeding a baby breastmilk is "dosing" the infant with hormones. It all depends on what the hormones are and how they actually affect the baby. Do you know the answer to this?

And yes, the first part is relevant because it proves that yes, it is possible (even if not likely) for a transwoman to naturally produce breastmilk to feed a baby with.

Synthetic hormones are not even in the same category as natural hormones...nothing is natural about a man transgendering to female breast feeding...
 
A woman's body naturally makes hormones that produce that milk.
A male body doesn't. That's the point.

So feeding a baby breastmilk is "dosing" the infant with hormones.
If it comes from a male that is so incredibly jacked up on hormones that he can Brest feed a baby? Yes Absolutly.
It all depends on what the hormones are and how they actually affect the baby. Do you know the answer to this?
Well the dosage that a man would have to have in order to produce enough Brest milk necessary to nurse an infant plus the natural testosterone, or the supplemental testosterone blockers he has could have tremendous effects on an infant.

And yes, the first part is relevant because it proves that yes, it is possible (even if not likely) for a transwoman to naturally produce breastmilk to feed a baby with.

No it's not. It's some fluke. It's not even remotely similar to a male on mega doses of hormones and blockers of other hormones.

We arent talking about a fluke we are talking about an engineered event.

So no its not the least bit relevant.
 
Synthetic hormones are not even in the same category as natural hormones...nothing is natural about a man transgendering to female breast feeding...

Well apparently it is because a man in shrilanka breast fed a baby once.

That logic makes no kind of sense.
 
Well apparently it is because a man in shrilanka breast fed a baby once.

That logic makes no kind of sense.

I think that it's illogical for a man to breast feed a baby. Women should be the only ones feeding babies, not men.
 
A male body doesn't. That's the point.

If it comes from a male that is so incredibly jacked up on hormones that he can Brest feed a baby? Yes Absolutly. Well the dosage that a man would have to have in order to produce enough Brest milk necessary to nurse an infant plus the natural testosterone, or the supplemental testosterone blockers he has could have tremendous effects on an infant.



No it's not. It's some fluke. It's not even remotely similar to a male on mega doses of hormones and blockers of other hormones.

We arent talking about a fluke we are talking about an engineered event.

So no its not the least bit relevant.

Unfortunately, my friend, it is exactly a fluke. You should really strive to make more sense, not less sense.
 
Yes it's illogical what I was saying

Just think about it. You have a guy who suddenly is able, to feed a baby through his breasts, you have an unnatural event taking place. Even YOU should see the logic in that...


It's OK to be straight.
 
You should try and understand what you're responding to before you respond so is not to look foolish.

I agree. Please proceed.
 
Just think about it. You have a guy who suddenly is able, to feed a baby through his breasts, you have an unnatural event taking place. Even YOU should see the logic in that...
yes I know that's why I said that.

It's OK to be straight.
of course it is I'm an ally of straight people. Even the dreaded straight white male.
 
It is obviously about the adult... what I want to know is what the **** is going on? If the homosexual stats are just under 4% nationally the transgender percentage has to be much lower... then how come we have 5 kids transitioning out of 94 in one year level?

I think 4% is low estimate for homosexuals,with a fluid amount drifting between Homosexual and Heterosexual. 10% is probably the lowest %
 
Synthetic hormones are not even in the same category as natural hormones...nothing is natural about a man transgendering to female breast feeding...

Not really soemthing that can be helped, we take Estradiol as a rule, I do, 4mg a day. My Estrogen levels are that of a 16 year old girl.
 
Synthetic hormones are not even in the same category as natural hormones...nothing is natural about a man transgendering to female breast feeding...

Women use those same hormones to breastfeed sometimes, when their bodies don't make enough. Women do not normally produce the hormones that are required for breastfeeding unless they have given birth recently. This hormone regime was developed for women who want to breastfeed but who can't.

https://www.livescience.com/61782-transgender-woman-breast-feeding.html

"The transgender woman was able to breast-feed after undergoing a regimen of hormonal therapy along with the use of a breast pump, in a process similar to what's done for women who cannot produce breast milk on their own (including women who want to breast-feed after adoption)."
 
A male body doesn't. That's the point.

If it comes from a male that is so incredibly jacked up on hormones that he can Brest feed a baby? Yes Absolutly. Well the dosage that a man would have to have in order to produce enough Brest milk necessary to nurse an infant plus the natural testosterone, or the supplemental testosterone blockers he has could have tremendous effects on an infant.



No it's not. It's some fluke. It's not even remotely similar to a male on mega doses of hormones and blockers of other hormones.

We arent talking about a fluke we are talking about an engineered event.

So no its not the least bit relevant.

Prove that the dosage necessary for any man vice any woman would "have tremendous effects on an infant".
 
I'm not sure about this one, but I am sure that it's going to be used as another excuse to bash trans people.
 
Back
Top Bottom