• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How many Genders do you accept?

How many Genders do you Accept?

  • 2 genders

    Votes: 38 88.4%
  • More than 2 genders

    Votes: 5 11.6%

  • Total voters
    43
  • Poll closed .
yes really based on facts and medical science
I wont be ignoring facts and medical science cause you choose to :shrug:
It simply seems you are making a common mistake of thinking sex and gender are equal or simply are uneducated on the specific topic you are asking about. You are free not to "accept" facts and medical science but your acceptance isnt needed, facts remain.

WHO | Gender and Genetics


https://web.archive.org/web/20170130022356/http://apps.who.int/gender/whatisgender/en/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender




also
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3786754/

Thats a United Nations crapola site! Of course they are promoting that, they will tell you Socialism is good too, and Sharia Law is good for you
 
Thats a United Nations crapola site! Of course they are promoting that, they will tell you Socialism is good too, and Sharia Law is good for you

LMAO if you dont like facts and science thats on you but again I wont be ignoring it like you ignored them and their references to doctors and studies and papers and ncbi (US National Library of Medicine
National Institutes of Health. Your snowflake like feelings about it being crapola has no accurate or factual support. ;)
 
IF, of course, that a higher percentage of trans are chimerias with brains and body having a dna mismatch. That is still an unknown.

Which is why I would love to see an actual study done. Even if just 10% of trans show chimerism, we can then see that there are those for whom it is a genetic/physical thing. And that there is more than one cause.
 
Amoeba are A Sexual that reproduce and or clone themselves.....

I said what I meant, and meant what I said.

Then what you said is wrong. Plain and simple. First off amoeba covers more than a single species. It is actually a subphylum with lots of further sub classifications. Secondly male and female are not a species.
 
So I should be free to call our customers anything I like and my boss can’t do anything about it? If I kept on calling a male customer “ma’am”, even after he objected, and he complained to my boss, nothing should happen to me? What if the customer is actually a female-to-male transgender (maybe I didn’t even realise). Should that make any difference?
You are conflating two separate issues. When you are on the job you say to the customers whatever the boss tells you or you leave the job. If you boss forbids the use of Merry Christmas, then you do not say it. If he tells you to call every customer ma'am regardless of gender then you do it. What you do when off the clock is irrelevant to when on it.
 
Thats a United Nations crapola site! Of course they are promoting that, they will tell you Socialism is good too, and Sharia Law is good for you

And that is why you are destined to be ignorant of the subject.
 
I feel if I had a dollar for every Gender I would have $2 and a bunch of counterfeits.

Do you feel there are 2 genders or more than 2 genders?

Do you feel there are 2 of Newton's laws of motion or more than 2?
 
tAEFWxh.png

I think you're confusing shirt size with gender.
 
Thats a United Nations crapola site! Of course they are promoting that, they will tell you Socialism is good too, and Sharia Law is good for you

That's a really strange way to react when someone explains part of the science to you.
 
How am I not surprised that Conservatives still dribble this bull crap. Another nonsensical thread that has nothing to do with anything constructive but more division. Hey how about you worry about your own sexual desires. I thought Conservatives believed in freedom. In reality they only care about their own freedom and everyone else has to conform to their world view. ShutTFU...
 
How am I not surprised that Conservatives still dribble this bull crap. Another nonsensical thread that has nothing to do with anything constructive but more division. Hey how about you worry about your own sexual desires. I thought Conservatives believed in freedom. In reality they only care about their own freedom and everyone else has to conform to their world view. ShutTFU...

Correction, I don't care what you or anyone else does, just don't tell me I have to accept it and treat you in that manner. Thanks for your closing remark showing your intellectual prowess.
 
/double facepalm

Seriously what's giving you trouble?

You asserted that a shirt that says there are more than two genders with different sizes is somehow absurd or contradictory. I'm explaining that there's a huge difference between shirt sizes and physiology.
 
Seriously what's giving you trouble?

You asserted that a shirt that says there are more than two genders with different sizes is somehow absurd or contradictory. I'm explaining that there's a huge difference between shirt sizes and physiology.



did you miss the options of which gender you can choose? you know the circled part?
 
OK, so what was you objection when you said this?
Thats the whole point, isnt it. It isnt a genteel question of coo-ing at folk and calling them what they want to be called. It is literally a matter of imposed legal restriction...something we have seen imposed in Canada and the UK and are seeing imposed in the US as well. While leftists sit around claiming oh...its harmless...its OK...dont worry...there are in fact people pressing legislation mandating it.
 
Thats the whole point, isnt it. It isnt a genteel question of coo-ing at folk and calling them what they want to be called. It is literally a matter of imposed legal restriction...something we have seen imposed in Canada and the UK and are seeing imposed in the US as well. While leftists sit around claiming oh...its harmless...its OK...dont worry...there are in fact people pressing legislation mandating it.
The only legislation I'm aware of is on care homes and hospitals against deliberately and repeatedly misgendering someone (which can only be a form of verbal abuse, no different to calling a black patient "stupid n****r"). Clearly that means the organisations have to ensure their staff follow those rules but frankly anyone incapable of showing that basic level of human respect shouldn't be involved in care anyway.

Any other question of being fired for this would be entirely down to the employer alone.
 
The only legislation I'm aware of is on care homes and hospitals against deliberately and repeatedly misgendering someone (which can only be a form of verbal abuse, no different to calling a black patient "stupid n****r"). Clearly that means the organisations have to ensure their staff follow those rules but frankly anyone incapable of showing that basic level of human respect shouldn't be involved in care anyway.

Any other question of being fired for this would be entirely down to the employer alone.
Nice to see that you are at least honest enough to admit without the stupid qualifying dance that yes...in fact already states are passing legislation targeting hate speech for refusing to call someone by their preferred gender pronouns. Some cant even muster that.

And we've only just begun.
 
Back
Top Bottom