• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Being a Man

"not going any where' is more than just a term for not enough money. It also indicts a lack of ambition and/skill set to be a responsible person. Some people don't want to play substitute mother for someone

I agree, but that is objectification. Its okay. I don't think it's unreasonably shallow.
 
I agree, but that is objectification. Its okay. I don't think it's unreasonably shallow.

Or, it is concerned about 'is this person reasonable enough to be a good father or not'
 
Or, it is concerned about 'is this person reasonable enough to be a good father or not'

Thats objectification. If you want a man that is going to be a good father, you are objectifing him for his fatherhood potential.

Again I don't think this is inherently or necessarily wrong.
 
I'm glad you posted that. Lots of truth there.

30 years ago I didn't even think about the thing with kids. Maybe 20 years ago I consciously started being very cautious about interacting with other people's children unless they were close friends, because of the exponential rise in parental paranoia about pedophiles, combined with the ultra-feminist assertion "all men are potential rapists".

Not me; I just like kids. But I didn't want to be seen that way, and after catching some disturbing looks just for chatting briefly with some cute little kid I grew wary of such interaction. Nobody wants to get "that look", let alone maybe some actual accusation.

Now, I'm a parent and I understand parental paranoia. The idea of your kid being kidnapped or abused is a horror. You tend to think better safe than sorry and for many "safe" means assuming any man that speaks to your kid or pats the kid on the head is secretly a pedo looking for an opportunity. Even though in reality, this is statistically not true.

It's sad; it leeches away some of the richness of life when, as a man, you don't dare speak to or play with a kid unless you know his parents well, and hesitate to go to the aid of a child in distress.

Yeah I feel the same. I'm very driven by rationally looking things and weighing probabilities and the like. I know beyond doubt that the vast majority of kids are kidnapped by someone who knows them and the probability that your own kids will be kidnapped by a stranger are vanishingly small. There's mountains of statistics proving that.
I know this. And it went out the window when my kids were small.
 
Back
Top Bottom