• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Playboy to Feature Its First Transgender Playmate

1. You only jerk off to women who are your exact type?

No, but I don't jerk off to trans people because they don't do anything for me. :shrug:

2. You assume you're in her league if you were to meet in a bar? Why because she's trans and she would be lucky for any guy to hit on her?

I'm not assuming anything other than my abilities to tell that this person was not born a woman.

If I were to meet her in a bar, I wouldn't be checking her out to make sure she was "passable". I'd just enjoy her company, if she chose to share mine. That's what being secure is.

You're right, only guys that date transgender people are secure in their sexuality. All those guys who only date women are just fakesters.
 
No, but I don't jerk off to trans people because they don't do anything for me. :shrug:



I'm not assuming anything other than my abilities to tell that this person was not born a woman.



You're right, only guys that date transgender people are secure in their sexuality. All those guys who only date women are just fakesters.

Straw man. Enjoying someone's company doesn't imply dating or having a sexual liason. It's not caring that someone is trans and talking to them like a normal person. You assume you don't jerk off to trans people, there are a lot of them in the porn industry. And is that really a skill you feel is necessary to hone and brag about? Why, so others will think you're not in anyway attracted to a trans woman? Yeah that sounds real secure...
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/19/arts/playboy-playmate-transgender.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

This came across my twitter feed, and I have to say, I'm disappointed in some of the comments I saw attached to it. She is an extremely beautiful woman, and from what I saw there is no way to tell she is trans. I applaud playboy, who has had trans women in their magazine before, btw. And for those who think Hugh would have never allowed this, she was chosen two months before his death. And he has a history of pushing the envelope, if you read the article it shows some of the comments sent in letters after Hugh featured the first black playmate in the 60s. They sound alot like some of the comments I read on my twitter feed today, let that sink in. And note, Playboy didn't suffer a lick when they did it, despite what the racist haters cried out as they cancelled subscriptions in the 60s.

Anyone butthurt over this needs to take a step back, and wonder if it's really trans people they have a problem with or their own sexuality. Because it sounds like most people are angry at playboy for making them attracted to a trans woman. Otherwise what's the beef, flip the page and move on. No one is forcing you to jerk off to naked women in the first place, why rain on everyone else's parade that have no problem being attracted to a beautiful woman regardless of what gender she was born.

This fap is for you Ines Rau, and may many others follow suit.

I never looked at play boy.
 
They are pretending to be women.Its no different than someone who modifies their body to look like another race or species.

On what basis do you conclude that they are pretending to be women?
 
Most guys want to look at pictures of women that they want to have sex with...

This person is not a woman. Once knowing that it changes everything.

You find, for example, Hillary Clinton more attractive than this beautiful model...?
 
That is fine but the second part is accurate. Once knowing it changes everything.

Would you feel ok about being tricked. Falling in love somehow never k owing and you go to have kids and then find out? I am better almost nobody would be cool with that.

There's a difference between an expectation of honesty and trust within a relationship, and attempting to instruct others to NOT be attracted to someone that you are personally repulsed by.
 
What didn’t you say? That the DNA of dogs and women are different? That that of men and women are different? I’m sorry. I thought you knew and were making an intelligent comment. But if not, what did you mean?

The chromosomes don't always match the genitalia.

The genitalia doesn't always match the brain.

When you have 7 billion people, there will be a lot of exceptions to things that we normally treat as ordinary rules. These exceptions are not a threat unless we are negligent in our social obligations.
 
1. You only jerk off to women who are your exact type?

2. You assume you're in her league if you were to meet in a bar? Why because she's trans and she would be lucky for any guy to hit on her?

If I were to meet her in a bar, I wouldn't be checking her out to make sure she was "passable". I'd just enjoy her company, if she chose to share mine. That's what being secure is.

That's disgusting. Please would you please quit with the "jerking off" jokes?

Some of us here are trying to have sex with sheep here.
 
You find, for example, Hillary Clinton more attractive than this beautiful model...?

I don't find either attractive...

There's a difference between an expectation of honesty and trust within a relationship, and attempting to instruct others to NOT be attracted to someone that you are personally repulsed by.

And this applies to me how?
 
I don't find either attractive...

Good, now that we've established that you don't find every example of the female gender attractive, perhaps you could consider that it's possible for there to be an example of a trans woman whose face, breasts, legs, etc. or some subset there of you might find attractive.

And this applies to me how?

Reinforcing prejudice against trans women that they are inferior examples of women. There are tall women, short women, fat women, hairy women; there are all kinds of women. Pre-judging major groups is prone to imprecision.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/19/arts/playboy-playmate-transgender.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

This came across my twitter feed, and I have to say, I'm disappointed in some of the comments I saw attached to it. She is an extremely beautiful woman, and from what I saw there is no way to tell she is trans. I applaud playboy, who has had trans women in their magazine before, btw. And for those who think Hugh would have never allowed this, she was chosen two months before his death. And he has a history of pushing the envelope, if you read the article it shows some of the comments sent in letters after Hugh featured the first black playmate in the 60s. They sound alot like some of the comments I read on my twitter feed today, let that sink in. And note, Playboy didn't suffer a lick when they did it, despite what the racist haters cried out as they cancelled subscriptions in the 60s.

Anyone butthurt over this needs to take a step back, and wonder if it's really trans people they have a problem with or their own sexuality. Because it sounds like most people are angry at playboy for making them attracted to a trans woman. Otherwise what's the beef, flip the page and move on. No one is forcing you to jerk off to naked women in the first place, why rain on everyone else's parade that have no problem being attracted to a beautiful woman regardless of what gender she was born.

This fap is for you Ines Rau, and may many others follow suit.

An alternative view is that 'she' is a man pretending to be a woman. I offer an opinion, that may be held by some, and await the outrage of the thought police, ever on the watch for transgressions of the new orthodoxy.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/19/arts/playboy-playmate-transgender.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

This came across my twitter feed, and I have to say, I'm disappointed in some of the comments I saw attached to it. She is an extremely beautiful woman, and from what I saw there is no way to tell she is trans. I applaud playboy, who has had trans women in their magazine before, btw. And for those who think Hugh would have never allowed this, she was chosen two months before his death. And he has a history of pushing the envelope, if you read the article it shows some of the comments sent in letters after Hugh featured the first black playmate in the 60s. They sound alot like some of the comments I read on my twitter feed today, let that sink in. And note, Playboy didn't suffer a lick when they did it, despite what the racist haters cried out as they cancelled subscriptions in the 60s.

Anyone butthurt over this needs to take a step back, and wonder if it's really trans people they have a problem with or their own sexuality. Because it sounds like most people are angry at playboy for making them attracted to a trans woman. Otherwise what's the beef, flip the page and move on. No one is forcing you to jerk off to naked women in the first place, why rain on everyone else's parade that have no problem being attracted to a beautiful woman regardless of what gender she was born.

This fap is for you Ines Rau, and may many others follow suit.

But they did wait for Hugh Hefner to die. He knew that the ideal “Girl next door” was not a tranny.
 
But they did wait for Hugh Hefner to die. He knew that the ideal “Girl next door” was not a tranny.

If they hadn't waited, I think it'd have killed him.

Just yet another thing that excessive PC bull**** and extremist left / SJW crap came along and completely ruined. :roll:
 
Good, now that we've established that you don't find every example of the female gender attractive, perhaps you could consider that it's possible for there to be an example of a trans woman whose face, breasts, legs, etc. or some subset there of you might find attractive.

Physically a trsnsgender female is not a woman.

Reinforcing prejudice against trans women that they are inferior examples of women. There are tall women, short women, fat women, hairy women; there are all kinds of women. Pre-judging major groups is prone to imprecision.

Mentally they are all woman...

...physically they are not a woman.
 
Physically a trsnsgender female is not a woman.



Mentally they are all woman...

...physically they are not a woman.

It depends on how you choose to define "physically a woman". There are many different characteristics; there may not be a vagina or a uterus, for example, but there may be breasts, long hair, more body fat, etc. characteristics that can reasonably said to be female.

The precise physical presentation among trans women is variable. I see no justification to evaluate physical forms that you have never seen.
 
Just looked at a bunch of pictures of her

View attachment 67224137
View attachment 67224138
View attachment 67224139
View attachment 67224140




. . meh . .

pretty . . . . but not for me.


She is WAY WAY to skinny for my personal taste but hey, she wont be the first women in playboy that will make think they need to eat a steak LOL

She is absolutely stunning, and there's no way in hell that anyone could look at those pictures and see a man. No way. So all of you who think you wouldn't pick her up in a bar? :lol: I call bull****.
 
Back
Top Bottom