https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/19/arts/playboy-playmate-transgender.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur
This came across my twitter feed, and I have to say, I'm disappointed in some of the comments I saw attached to it. She is an extremely beautiful woman, and from what I saw there is no way to tell she is trans. I applaud playboy, who has had trans women in their magazine before, btw. And for those who think Hugh would have never allowed this, she was chosen two months before his death. And he has a history of pushing the envelope, if you read the article it shows some of the comments sent in letters after Hugh featured the first black playmate in the 60s. They sound alot like some of the comments I read on my twitter feed today, let that sink in. And note, Playboy didn't suffer a lick when they did it, despite what the racist haters cried out as they cancelled subscriptions in the 60s.
Anyone butthurt over this needs to take a step back, and wonder if it's really trans people they have a problem with or their own sexuality. Because it sounds like most people are angry at playboy for making them attracted to a trans woman. Otherwise what's the beef, flip the page and move on. No one is forcing you to jerk off to naked women in the first place, why rain on everyone else's parade that have no problem being attracted to a beautiful woman regardless of what gender she was born.
This fap is for you Ines Rau, and may many others follow suit.