• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pedosexuality [W:399]

WCH

WCH

Believer
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
31,009
Reaction score
9,029
Location
The Lone Star State.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
C1LHlpmXUAAFwut.jpg


https://twitter.com/i/moments/788138346459623424?lang=en

Deviance on parade. Told ya.
 
WCH said:
C1LHlpmXUAAFwut.jpg


https://twitter.com/i/moments/788138346459623424?lang=en

Deviance on parade. Told ya.
Click to expand...

No. Some twitter trolls does not show any kind of deviance on parade.

If someone takes a Christian cross, completely defiles it with satanic messages and then 10 other people online follow do the same, would you agree that is deviance on parade and represents Christianity since it uses a Christian symbol?
 
Image of crinkled paper with text imposed over the crinkled paper. It's fake. This image exists only on a computer. Why would someone do hat, I wonder?
 
Ikari said:
Told us what? That you fall for obvious ruses? Come back when you have something a bit more firm that twitter, lol.
Click to expand...

This is how I was alerted to this movement...thru Twitter posts.

I've mentioned more than once on this forum the direction I believed all this acceptance of deviant behavior was headed. This is confirmation of a movement afoot.
 
KevinKohler said:
Image of crinkled paper with text imposed over the crinkled paper. It's fake. This image exists only on a computer. Why would someone do hat, I wonder?
Click to expand...

Because crinkled paper is one of the background choices? :)
 
WCH said:
This is how I was alerted to this movement...thru Twitter posts.

I've mentioned more than once on this forum the direction I believed all this acceptance of deviant behavior was headed. This is confirmation of a movement afoot.
Click to expand...

Assuming that sign is, in any way, legit, it only reflects the views of those holding them or tweeting them or whatever. It does not indicate any kind of broad acceptance by anyone.
 
Last edited:
WCH said:
This is how I was alerted to this movement...thru Twitter posts.

I've mentioned more than once on this forum the direction I believed all this acceptance of deviant behavior was headed. This is confirmation of a movement afoot.
Click to expand...

This is confirmation bias. You saw something you have no proof is anything but internet troll stuff, but it said something you wanted it to say, so now you're parading it about as if it were real.

Come back when you have something more solid that Twitter and we'll talk.
 
joG said:
Minority rights must be protected. So, what are you complaining about? In a society that allows the mother to kill it only 90 months earlier it seems odd to shield it from sex. ;)
Click to expand...

Of course YOU would be think that.
 
WCH said:
Because crinkled paper is one of the background choices? :)
Click to expand...

Doubtful. This appears more like an effort to make something look like it's real, I.E., an actual flyer found in circulation and photographed.

I'll do a google search of lgbtp, and see what pops up.
 
Ikari said:
Told us what? That you fall for obvious ruses? Come back when you have something a bit more firm that twitter, lol.
Click to expand...

What makes you think it a ruse. The German Greens wanted pedophelia legalized some years ago but had to give up that piece of minority rights protection, when the majority created a ****storm.
 
X Factor said:
Assuming that sign is, in any way, legit, it only reflects the views of those holding them or tweeting them or whatever. It does not indicate any kind of broad acceptance by anyone.
Click to expand...

Acceptance/normalization starts somewhere. This is not the first time this has raised it's ugly head.
 
joG said:
What makes you think it a ruse. The German Greens wanted pedophelia legalized some years ago but had to give up that piece of minority rights protection, when the majority created a ****storm.
Click to expand...

That the gay, lesbian, and transgendered group on whole has taken on pedophelia? That's what's being suggested here. Not some handful of fringe jerks, but rather the overall, larger movement has brought it into the fold and is pushing for its acceptance. And that is why I think it's a ruse.

But if there's more information from a source much more reliable that twitter, we can discuss it.
 
joG said:
....which doesn't answer the question, of course.
Click to expand...

That your comments are idiotic, I think that sums it up nicely that you are comparing the want to have sex with children and a medical procedure that is legal. Of course your comments are ****ed up and stupid like most on the right.
 
WCH said:
Acceptance/normalization starts somewhere. This is not the first time this has raised it's ugly head.
Click to expand...

The only ones that raise their ugly heads are the idiotic dumb conservatives that think comparing pedophiles to LGBT folks is valid.
 
Ikari said:
This is confirmation bias. You saw something you have no proof is anything but internet troll stuff, but it said something you wanted it to say, so now you're parading it about as if it were real.

Come back when you have something more solid that Twitter and we'll talk.
Click to expand...

This is a bit old but, it outlines my concerns effectively.

We Are On the Road To Normalizing Pedophilia
 
WCH said:
This is a bit old but, it outlines my concerns effectively.

We Are On the Road To Normalizing Pedophilia
Click to expand...

That's all just fear-mongering propaganda. Again, if you want to suggest that the LGBT community on whole has adopted pedophilia and are pushing for its acceptance, you need something more than a picture on twitter. This has every marking of being made up to troll the easily troll-able.
 
So, all I could find, after an extensive Google search, were multiple links to the very exact same image you posted. I also found that LGBTP, the P stands for PANsexual, which simply means, a person who is attracted to everything, dudes, chicks, any race, etc.
 
Praxas said:
The only ones that raise their ugly heads are the idiotic dumb conservatives that think comparing pedophiles to LGBT folks is valid.
Click to expand...

I'm not comparing squat. The pedophiles are using the homosexual's civil rights handbook.

The same arguments Anthony Kennedy (and I have no evidence that Kennedy is a pedophile) made in deciding Lawrence vs. Texas and hammered home in Obergefell vs. Hodges can be applied directly to pedophiles. The fact that we already allow 13 and 14 year old girls sufficient agency to decide to take birth control pills or get an abortion without parental consent is a de facto death blow to state age of consent laws.

We Are On the Road To Normalizing Pedophilia
 
WCH said:
I'm not comparing squat. The pedophiles are using the homosexual's civil rights handbook.

The same arguments Anthony Kennedy (and I have no evidence that Kennedy is a pedophile) made in deciding Lawrence vs. Texas and hammered home in Obergefell vs. Hodges can be applied directly to pedophiles. The fact that we already allow 13 and 14 year old girls sufficient agency to decide to take birth control pills or get an abortion without parental consent is a de facto death blow to state age of consent laws.

We Are On the Road To Normalizing Pedophilia
Click to expand...

A Grand Canyon of difference between allowing an under age girl access to birth control without parental consent, and allowing adults to have sexual relationships with miners without parental consent.
 
Let's assume someone forms a truly awful set of beliefs, like objectively awful, including human sacrifice, etc. and calls it their religion. The originator manages to gain a few followers who legitimately believe whatever the originator put out there. Could someone come along and fairly be all, "See? This is what religious freedom brings with it". Would all that be a reason to not support freedom of religion?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom