• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pedosexuality [W:399]

Mac77 said:
All they need is one wacko lib judge to rule in their favor
Click to expand...

No liberal judge would since there is no standing whatsoever for it and there is no push for it either. It seems the ones fixated (almost hoping) on legalizing underage sex with children appear to be some conservatives.
 
Praxas said:
No liberal judge would since there is no standing whatsoever for it and there is no push for it either.
Click to expand...

A federal judge can do whatever he wants to
 
Praxas said:
And comparing something that is LEGAL, such as two consenting adults entering into a same sex marriage and something ILLEGAL like having sex with underage children is not only sick, but stupid. Why is it conservatives are always the one to try and make idiotic comparisons?

Tell us, which up and coming politicians, elected by the people are going to vote to make underage sex with children allowed?
Click to expand...

You got off on an ignorance tangent. The point of the thread is...

The LGBTP Movement: How Pedophiles Are Attempting To Hijack Gay Rights
 
Mac77 said:
A federal judge can do whatever he wants to
Click to expand...

Bull****. Sell your fear to some moronic Trump supporter, they may believe you.
 
WCH said:
I believe the story was about pedophiliacs using the lgtb handbook to further their agenda not Lgtb acceptance.
Click to expand...

Your picture is of co-opting the LGBT logo. You don't have a "story" other than some ridiculous twitter thing trying to pretend that this is some massive movement.
 
WCH said:
You got off on an ignorance tangent. The point of the thread is...

The LGBTP Movement: How Pedophiles Are Attempting To Hijack Gay Rights
Click to expand...

And it doesn't work as children are not consenting entities. Case closed since there is no push for that either. Just another sick twisted idea from a conservative. Why is it that some conservatives are the ones almost hoping that underage sex with children becomes legal?
 
Praxas said:
Bull****. Sell your fear to some moronic Trump supporter, they may believe you.
Click to expand...

legalizing homosexuality and gay marriage did not happen by popular vote but rather by unelected dictators in black robes

Pedophilia will get its way using the same dirty trick
 
Last edited:
WCH said:
I never said there was.

The LGBTP Movement: How Pedophiles Are Attempting To Hijack Gay Rights
Click to expand...

Look, if you want to sound the alarm that pedos are seeking to be accepted and legitimized by trying to attach themselves to the LGBT community and it's bull**** for them to do that, I will agree with you. What it seems you're doing is saying that LGBT broadly accept it and agree with it and that I don't see.
 
WCH said:
I never said there was.

The LGBTP Movement: How Pedophiles Are Attempting To Hijack Gay Rights
Click to expand...

You don't have to directly say it. It is what you very clearly are trying to imply.
 
Mac77 said:
legalizing homosexuality and gay marriage did not happen by popular vote but rather by unelected dictators in black robes
Click to expand...

Actually there was precedence already to allow it. Two consenting adults could already be married, the only difference is the sex. The same cannot be said and you have yet to show ANY push by politicians to allow sex with underage children be allowed. Why is that you can't provide any evidence of that? Oh yeah, because there isn't a politicians elected out there that has pushed for it.

Pedophilia will get its way using the same dirty trick
Click to expand...

Nope, but glad you are hoping it happens, says a lot about conservatives.
 
Mac77 said:
legalizing homosexuality and gay marriage did not happen by popular vote but rather by unelected dictators in black robes

Pedophilia will get its way using the same dirty trick
Click to expand...

support for Same sex marriage was already at over 50% at the time it was legalized. Can you say the same for support for underage sex with children? I mean besides the small amount of conservatives that seem to hope it will be legalized.
 
Praxas said:
support for Same sex marriage was already at over 50% at the time it was legalized. Can you say the same for support for underage sex with children? I mean besides the small amount of conservatives that seem to hope it will be legalized.
Click to expand...

Bull****

Except for one or two isolated cases gay marriage never passed a legeslative bill or a referendum

That is the most reliable poll
 
Mac77 said:
Bull****

Except for one or two isolated cases gay marriage never passed a legeslative bill or a referendum

That is the most reliable poll
Click to expand...

I didn't say it passed legislative, I said it was popular with the people by over 50%. Seems you think slavery should have been legal just because it didn't pass legislatively at the time. you just keep showing why conservatives have been on the wrong side of history.
 
Praxas said:
I didn't say it passed legislative, I said it was popular with the people by over 50%. Seems you think slavery should have been legal just because it didn't pass legislatively at the time. you just keep showing why conservatives have been on the wrong side of history.
Click to expand...

If it cannot be enacted by the democratic process but has to rely on autocratic judges then it does not have true popular support
 
Praxas said:
Actually there was precedence already to allow it. Two consenting adults could already be married, the only difference is the sex. The same cannot be said and you have yet to show ANY push by politicians to allow sex with underage children be allowed. Why is that you can't provide any evidence of that? Oh yeah, because there isn't a politicians elected out there that has pushed for it.

Nope, but glad you are hoping it happens, says a lot about conservatives.
Click to expand...

Evidence of what? That there have been no initiatives by politicians to legalize children's having sex? But there have. I don't know of. An attempt in the US though.
 
joG said:
Evidence of what? That there have been no initiatives by politicians to legalize children's having sex? But there have. I don't know of. An attempt in the US though.
Click to expand...

What politicians in the US have pushed for legality to have sex with underage children? And if there isn't, then hello? We live in the US remember?
 
joG said:
Evidence of what? That there have been no initiatives by politicians to legalize children's having sex? But there have. I don't know of. An attempt in the US though.
Click to expand...

Who? When? Where?
 
Praxas said:
I didn't say it passed legislative, I said it was popular with the people by over 50%. Seems you think slavery should have been legal just because it didn't pass legislatively at the time. you just keep showing why conservatives have been on the wrong side of history.
Click to expand...

Only because of liberal strongholds like California and New York. Oh and yes, things should be passed by the legislative process as that is part of what it means to be a country of law.
 
Henrin said:
Only because of liberal strongholds like California and New York. Oh and yes, things should be passed by the legislative process as that is part of what it means to be a country of law.
Click to expand...

When something is unconstitutional like gay marriage bans were, no they shouldn't be. That's part of the balance of powers that you hate.
 
Mac77 said:
legalizing homosexuality and gay marriage did not happen by popular vote but rather by unelected dictators in black robes
Click to expand...

LOL! They're simply judges, not dictators, and they did the job they were put there to do. This seems to anger you. Oh, well.
Pedophilia will get its way using the same dirty trick
Click to expand...

There was no dirty trick.
 
Praxas said:
When something is unconstitutional like gay marriage bans were, no they shouldn't be. That's part of the balance of powers that you hate.
Click to expand...

Could everyone marry someone from the opposite sex?
 
Henrin said:
Could everyone marry someone from the opposite sex?
Click to expand...

Now everyone can marry the same sex, it's equal as well. that's a stupid argument, by the way, that everyone could marry the opposite sex so it's equal. Just dumb. Oh well, several friends have now been allowed to marry despite your hatred for it.
 
Praxas said:
Now everyone can marry the same sex, it's equal as well. that's a stupid argument, by the way, that everyone could marry the opposite sex so it's equal. Just dumb. Oh well, several friends have now been allowed to marry despite your hatred for it.
Click to expand...

The difference is that marriage between a man and woman is natural whereas gay marriage is perversion and unnatural
 
Mac77 said:
The difference is that marriage between a man and woman is natural whereas gay marriage is perversion and unnatural
Click to expand...

Your definition of "natural" and "unnatural" is your opinion. Homosexuality happens in nature so it is by definition natural. Must burn your hide that gay people can marry, that's good.
 
Praxas said:
Now everyone can marry the same sex, it's equal as well. that's a stupid argument, by the way, that everyone could marry the opposite sex so it's equal. Just dumb. Oh well, several friends have now been allowed to marry despite your hatred for it.
Click to expand...

If the law applies to everyone equally then it is equal. What you're talking about is expanding the law because some people wanted to marry the same sex.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom