• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pedosexuality [W:399]

I'm not comparing squat. The pedophiles are using the homosexual's civil rights handbook.

The same arguments Anthony Kennedy (and I have no evidence that Kennedy is a pedophile) made in deciding Lawrence vs. Texas and hammered home in Obergefell vs. Hodges can be applied directly to pedophiles. The fact that we already allow 13 and 14 year old girls sufficient agency to decide to take birth control pills or get an abortion without parental consent is a de facto death blow to state age of consent laws.

We Are On the Road To Normalizing Pedophilia

Using the same playbook? Hmmmmm let's see, it's LEGAL for two consenting same sex adults to have sex and be a couple. Is the same true for pedophiles that it is legal to have sex with kids? NO.

Now, tell us who would vote to legalize sex with underage children? Oh yeah, NO politician. Again, your comments are nothing but idiotic as you try and run from the comparison you validated yourself. Why is it uppity religious conservatives are such morons.
 
Let's assume someone forms a truly awful set of beliefs, like objectively awful, including human sacrifice, etc. and calls it their religion. The originator manages to gain a few followers who legitimately believe whatever the originator put out there. Could someone come along and fairly be all, "See? This is what religious freedom brings with it". Would all that be a reason to not support freedom of religion?

Yep. Sounds totally reasonable to me! ;)
 
Let's assume someone forms a truly awful set of beliefs, like objectively awful, including human sacrifice, etc. and calls it their religion. The originator manages to gain a few followers who legitimately believe whatever the originator put out there. Could someone come along and fairly be all, "See? This is what religious freedom brings with it". Would all that be a reason to not support freedom of religion?

And boom goes the dynamite.



End thread.
 
So, all I could find, after an extensive Google search, were multiple links to the very exact same image you posted. I also found that LGBTP, the P stands for PANsexual, which simply means, a person who is attracted to everything, dudes, chicks, any race, etc.

I searched also. IMO, you'd have to be a fool to advertise your affinity for children on the Internet in the first place.
 
A Grand Canyon of difference between allowing an under age girl access to birth control without parental consent, and allowing adults to have sexual relationships with miners without parental consent.

Oh really? I'd say it enhances the conditions.
 
That your comments are idiotic, I think that sums it up nicely that you are comparing the want to have sex with children and a medical procedure that is legal. Of course your comments are ****ed up and stupid like most on the right.

The only ones that raise their ugly heads are the idiotic dumb conservatives that think comparing pedophiles to LGBT folks is valid.

WOW, what a real brainiac you are. Obviously just a one trick dick, and I bet you think you're adding something of value, don't you?
 
Last edited:
WOW, what a real brainiac you are. Obviously just a ane trick dick, and I bet you think you're adding something of value, don't you?

Why did you even bother waste posting that that cow **** you just pooped out on your keyboard? Go stalk someone else, I'm married so sorry to disappoint you.

The comparison between pedophiles and LGBT folks or abortion is just idiotic. That is FACT.
 
I searched also. IMO, you'd have to be a fool to advertise your affinity for children on the Internet in the first place.

I agree, but I appreciate their foolishness. Makes it easier for me to determine who I will allow my kids to be around, lol.


There IS a movement to make pedophilia normal. South Park did an episode on it years ago, which is why I took the time to google this one up. But that movement, and lgbt, are in no way related, and I highly doubt they'll EVER join forces.
 
Even many homosexuals laughed and scoffed when the first homosexal demanded the right to marry his bunk buddy

That was a bridge too far when they had not even advanced to the point of decriminalizing gay perversion.

"We just want the right to do what we do to each other in the privacy of our own bedroom"

But that didn't last long, did it?
 
Let's assume someone forms a truly awful set of beliefs, like objectively awful, including human sacrifice, etc. and calls it their religion. The originator manages to gain a few followers who legitimately believe whatever the originator put out there. Could someone come along and fairly be all, "See? This is what religious freedom brings with it". Would all that be a reason to not support freedom of religion?


I suppose that's the essence of 'freedom' but, I would compare it to yelling fire in the theater.

So we should let the normalization begin?
 
What a bunch of fear mongering garbage. And Milo has no room to talk, especially since he was the one that was defending the actions of a pedophile.

IMO, Milo is using constitutional freedoms to make his case. Which is how the LGBT gained their civil rights.
 
I suppose that's the essence of 'freedom' but, I would compare it to yelling fire in the theater.

So we should let the normalization begin?

You're tilting at windmills. There's no evidence the LGBT community has adopted Pedophilia into the fold and is pushing for its "normalization".
 
Oh really? I'd say it enhances the conditions.

A minor having access to birth control without parental consent is allowing a young girl to NOT have a decision that will affect the entire rest of her life forced on her by her parents, for whatever reason.

Allowing adults to have unrestricted access to children sexually....is just not at all similar.
 
Why did you even bother waste posting that that cow **** you just pooped out on your keyboard? Go stalk someone else, I'm married so sorry to disappoint you.

The comparison between pedophiles and LGBT folks or abortion is just idiotic. That is FACT.

Don't flatter yourself. You're obviously not a pleasant fellow to anyone of differing political views, so I have no curiosity, at all, about who you are as a person. I can already see that. But if you're going to spew your garbage here, you invite comment, sorry to tell you. Now, if you're saying to me that you're not worth the effort of replying to, then you may have a point.
 
IMO, Milo is using constitutional freedoms to make his case. Which is how the LGBT gained their civil rights.

Children do not have constitutional freedoms, so no such argument would work.
 
IMO, Milo is using constitutional freedoms to make his case. Which is how the LGBT gained their civil rights.

No he did not. But that is really besides the point.

The fact is, there is no big push to normalize pedophilia within the LGBT community, and what this is, is just a bunch of stupid fear mongering that has been coming from the anti-gay crowd for years.
 
You're tilting at windmills. There's no evidence the LGBT community has adopted Pedophilia into the fold and is pushing for its "normalization".

I believe the story was about pedophiliacs using the lgtb handbook to further their agenda not Lgtb acceptance.
 
Don't flatter yourself. You're obviously not a pleasant fellow to anyone of differing political views, so I have no curiosity, at all, about who you are as a person. I can already see that. But if you're going to spew your garbage here, you invite comment, sorry to tell you. Now, if you're saying to me that you're not worth the effort of replying to, then you may have a point.

Again, go find someone else to stalk, I'm married. Unless your plan is to continue derailing this thread to stalk me.

Comparing abortion and LGBT rights to pedophiles is idiotic. Now, unless you care to actually comment on this thread, I suggest you just bow out and hopefully find a soul mate someone else.
 
I believe the story was about pedophiliacs using the lgtb handbook to further their agenda not Lgtb acceptance.

And comparing something that is LEGAL, such as two consenting adults entering into a same sex marriage and something ILLEGAL like having sex with underage children is not only sick, but stupid. Why is it conservatives are always the one to try and make idiotic comparisons?

Tell us, which up and coming politicians, elected by the people are going to vote to make underage sex with children allowed?
 
I suppose that's the essence of 'freedom' but, I would compare it to yelling fire in the theater.

So we should let the normalization begin?

I don't doubt that there are those pushing for or advocating normalization, but that does not mean anyone, straight, gay or whatever does or has to accept it.
 
No he did not. But that is really besides the point.

The fact is, there is no big push to normalize pedophilia within the LGBT community, and what this is, is just a bunch of stupid fear mongering that has been coming from the anti-gay crowd for years.

I never said there was.

The LGBTP Movement: How Pedophiles Are Attempting To Hijack Gay Rights
 
I don't doubt that there are those pushing for or advocating normalization, but that does not mean anyone, straight, gay or whatever does or has to accept it.

I don't get a warm, fuzzy feeling that the Left in general won't push this on the citizenry, just like Sharia.
 
Back
Top Bottom