• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are small TITS big now?

Big uns sag and stretch and look awful as the calendar pages turn. Small, not tiny is good.
 
Breast augmentation rates have been going down because more and more women are beginning to acknowledge the health hazards of most implants.
Yes, there are natural alternatives to silicon implants but it is much more difficult to be a good candidate for them, plus there is more chance that the surgery
will not "take", as in the transplanted adipose tissue simply migrates again, or gets absorbed.

So, you can't really fault women for not wanting to opt for an implant procedure which is damaging to their health.

Side note: My first wife had FF cups, nothing short of spectacular.
I alluded to Russ Meyer in another post.
He pursued her, she turned down the offers...she could have easily been a Russ Meyer gal.
My current wife has but a mere healthy C cup, but to be honest, nothing short of spectacular, which for me proves that "BIG" breasts aren't the thing, PRETTY breasts are.

In the end, it just boils down to being lucky in the genetics department more than anything else.
If you take good care of yourself and have a bit of luck in the genetics, you get to have a pretty pair of boobies.
One thing's for sure...for the most part, BRAS do absolutely nothing to prevent sagging, and in fact they may actually cause more sagging.
This doesn't surprise me in the least because the brassiere is 100% a male invention.

So, ARE small tits the new big tits? No, natural breasts are preferred over implants.
That is probably a good thing.

Ultimately, women who are comfortable with their sexuality can make themselves VERY attractive no matter what they look like.
Guys, just be glad they put up with our foibles. No matter what, women are jolly well okay and I love being around them.
 
Breast augmentation rates have been going down because more and more women are beginning to acknowledge the health hazards of most implants.
Yes, there are natural alternatives to silicon implants but it is much more difficult to be a good candidate for them, plus there is more chance that the surgery
will not "take", as in the transplanted adipose tissue simply migrates again, or gets absorbed.

Health hazards? Are breast implants going down for m-to-f transsexuals even if they are preop with their male genitals intact? I know not all m-to-f transsexuals get breast implants, but some do as well as cosmetic surgery on their jaw line. But I thought such things are praised by liberals and many in the medical community as healthy, including f-to-m transsexuals that get on the male hormone testosterone and body build. If she's w-to-w bodybuilder then magically said hormone is "a death sentence," "unhealthy," etc. Same with breast implants for w-to-w, but magically breast implants become the epitome of health when m-to-f transsexual women get them. But now we know how 1 person talks another person into stoning a woman and then a 3rd and then a 10th and pretty soon groups of other men are joining an already mob.



So, ARE small tits the new big tits? No, natural breasts are preferred over implants.
That is probably a good thing.

A good thing, huh?

Just so long as you do not switch acting roles in a different thread and join some brain dead mob in their chant, "You're trans-phobic!," if some dude says he has no beef with transsexuals but only wants women with real breasts and a natural vagina.



As for me, I never was a "breast guy." I like nice breast, even nice big breasts, but as long as a woman has a nice shape in the body and butt I really don't care if her chest is as flat as a board. Ergo, I've always liked some of the Brazilian women modeled in in images of the late 1990s and early 2000s. Some of them via some Amerindian ancestry, had very small breasts but round butts.
 
Health hazards? Are breast implants going down for m-to-f transsexuals even if they are preop with their male genitals intact? I know not all m-to-f transsexuals get breast implants, but some do as well as cosmetic surgery on their jaw line. But I thought such things are praised by liberals and

I don't know what the rest of your descent into gibberish psychobabble was about.
We're talking about breasts, and you start spewing about liberals and transphobia, etc etc.
Okayfinewhatever.
 
Originally Posted by Checkerboard Strangler View Post

Breast augmentation rates have been going down because more and more women are beginning to acknowledge the health hazards of most implants.

I don't know what the rest of your descent into gibberish psychobabble was about.

What is your descent into gibberish psychobabble about? Do you view m-to-f transsexuals getting breast implants not a health hazard for them or no?

We're talking about breasts, and you start spewing about liberals and transphobia, etc etc.
Okayfinewhatever.

The thread is about breasts and breast implants. According to liberals people like Caitlyn Jenner don't think they are women they are in fact people born female, because according to liberals biological sex is objectively in a persons brain (i.e., female brain vs male brain) and not in their anatomy and chromosomes.

So, your own words are this:

Originally Posted by Checkerboard Strangler View Post

So, ARE small tits the new big tits? No, natural breasts are preferred over implants.
That is probably a good thing.

So, does it logically follow from your explicit statement, your pontifical claim, that therefore most men prefer the natural breasts of women born women to the breast implants of m-to-f transsexuals? And does it therefore also follow, to use your own words above, "That is probably a good thing"?

I think for myself, and I question the propositions of the American mob, the group-think people, in their homo-feminist contradictions.

If you deflect from those two questions by making remarks focused on me rather than on the questions and subject, then you de facto admit I m right (and it indicates you are one of those people that in fact make those contradictions as you switch from one theatrical stage to the next playing different acting roles as your brain dead mob commands you).
 
What is your descent into gibberish psychobabble about? Do you view m-to-f transsexuals getting breast implants not a health hazard for them or no?

I have no opinion on m-f transsexuals getting breast implants.
I'm not a doctor, so I can't refer to the special needs or health issues of a transsexual.
I'm not dating, nor have I ever dated a transsexual.
I'm not knowledgeable about transsexual health issues in general.

So, no matter how HARD you try to spin this, it's not going to get an answer out of me that you're going to view as satisfactory.
That's your problem.
And in particular, your broad sweeping generalizations about liberals, about Caitlyn Jenner, who I know nothing about, about me, and about the the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow sound to me like gibberish psychobabble.

And with that, you're on ignore.
 
By the way, Fast Pace's argument style sounds suspiciously like someone I told to go F-OFF in large letters and graphics a few months ago.
Is it possible that Fast Pace is a sock puppet for another well known member of DP?
 
Warning: article in link shows women (photos) in manners that probably is not appropriate for work pl school settings. It is not porn but even calendar pinups of women in swimsuits is not even consider work place appropriate, for example.

Japan Prefers Small Breasts and Brazil Prefers Butts: Lessons From Tittygram | | Observer

Title of article:

Japan Prefers Small Breasts and Brazil Prefers Butts: Lessons From Tittygram


Excerpt:

As the service was made available worldwide, the company began to learn that tastes in breasts were no more universal than basic consideration the talent. Mr. Gritsenko wrote us a little about what he learned about different countries as it launched.


If breast implants can release chemicals into the body that harm women (or men) it is good if breast implant rates go down. But I bet female breast implants for biological males, post 1950s, has skyrocketed upwards (not down) in rate. That is to9 say more biological males transition now to female than in the 1950s I would hazard a guess and more biological males today get female breast implants than biological males did in the 1950s. At least in the USA.

Another cosmetic chemical solution in the body it would be nice to see a decline in the rate of use of would be Synthol. A substance that is not on the decline but on the rise. I'm happy this stuff was not popular in the 1980s and 1990s. Women (some) want big breasts and men (some) want big arms and big chests.





This American gay man (he says he is homosexual and in his 50s) has shot synthol into his chest (kind of like breast implants for born women and m-to-f transsexual women). His Chest looks massive but abnormal and "swollen-like." He claims it is pretty safe. I'm doubting that.


 
Originally Posted by Checkerboard Strangler View Post

Breast augmentation rates have been going down because more and more women are beginning to acknowledge the health hazards of most implants.

I have no opinion on m-f transsexuals getting breast implants.
I'm not a doctor, so I can't refer to the special needs or health issues of a transsexual.
I'm not dating, nor have I ever dated a transsexual.
I'm not knowledgeable about transsexual health issues in general.

So, you are playing the stage acting role now that you don't know if breast implants are a health hazard to the body (physiological system) of m-to-f transsexuals?

Well... as someone that majored in biology let me inform you that chemistry and physics that drives the biological organisms and species called human beings, the deterministic nature of those processes of chemistry and physics (per their laws) are the same whether your name is Jeff or Jane or whether you have a penis or vagina. There are physiological differences between biological males and females (all m-to-f transsexuals that are XY chromosomes are physiologically male, *inferences* from their brain scans does not change that) but that does not mean the laws of chemistry and physics stops f__ working because Bruce wants to become Caitlyn and say... gets breast implants.

Plenty of Nazis were doctors. The proposition that being a politically zealot medical doctor still means one can't be questioned and *must* be believed by brain dead group-think followers, can kiss my a__. I was given a brain, I will use it, be I placed in 1930s Germany or in 21st century USA.


So, no matter how HARD you try to spin this, it's not going to get an answer out of me that you're going to view as satisfactory.

There is no spin. Can a woman get female breast implants, can a man? Answer: yes.

Can a woman get a penis in her butt, can a man? Answer: yes.

Can a woman get drunk, can a man? Answer: yes.

Can a woman wear pants, can a man? Answer: yes.

If female breast implants are a health hazard for women, if they are, then what in the hell makes anyone with half a brain think there is little to no chance they are not a health hazard for biological males become m-to-f transsexual women?


That's your problem.

No, it is to my credit I'm more intelligent than you and far less likely than you to get sucked into group-think.

And in particular, your broad sweeping generalizations about liberals...

You made broad sweeping generalizations insinuating men prefer natural breasts to fake breast implants. Liberals always--like some corrupt medieval Popes--absolve themselves of their sweeping generalizations about what the hell men think, want, and like when it supports their feminist religious beliefs. But in a different thread when I stated that most men (not all) want to marry women that can get impregnated and give birth to their (the men's) biological children, and therefore men will have sex with m-to-f transsexuals but most men will not marry them, out came you Nazi homo-femninist liberals attacking me as hating or being biased against m-to-f transsexuals.


about Caitlyn Jenner, who I know nothing about, about me, and about the the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow sound to me like gibberish psychobabble

You don't know how foolish you sound. I mean... that sounds like some childish reply a freshman in high school would make.

And with that, you're on ignore.

There are men like that too with evading superior boxers who they fear they will get beat up by in the boxing ring. Your character is like that. Had you had better character you would have simply stated earlier: you may have a point, never thought of it like that, but I don't know enough on the subject to feel confident saying if you are right or wrong.
 
Big uns sag and stretch and look awful as the calendar pages turn. Small, not tiny is good.


Meh. I like boobs of all sizes. My wife has fake ones. Shes had them nearly a decade now and they still look like early 20s natural breasts. They arent overly large and fit her body type very well.

Over the course of my life Ive dated women of all shapes and sizes. One lady that I remained friends with from a relationship in highschool still has amazing looking natural DDDs at nearly 40 years old. And other women who are in their mid 30s who've always been on the more flat edge of the spectrum whos breasts look like deflated balloons. Me thinks it has more to do with how you take care of yourself.

Anyway to the op. What is considered the ideal body type changes for both men and women yearly. Now it seema to be moving away from busty yet fit women to athletic. It might also have something to do with the women who are coming of age now learning a bit more self cofidence from their mothers and are more comfortable in thier own skin the way they are than previous generations.
 
Last edited:
Women with high self esteem and fulfilling their goals will not worry about how big or small they are.
 
Women with high self esteem and fulfilling their goals will not worry about how big or small they are.

Generalizations generally arent a good way to go about things. Everyone has something they would change about themselves. Sometimes its just a desire sometimes people actually set about to change it.

Take my wife for example. She is confident almost to the point of cockiness, just like me. And has the self esteem to go along with that confidence. We have both fulfilled every goal we have set ourselves toward. But she still wanted fake tits.

Wanting to change something about yourself does not mean you are actually unhappy. It does not mean you lack confidence. It simply means that there is something you want to change.
 
That smiley terrifies me to wits end, OP. Also, no, they are not.
 
Warning: article in link shows women (photos) in manners that probably is not appropriate for work pl school settings. It is not porn but even calendar pinups of women in swimsuits is not even consider work place appropriate, for example.

Japan Prefers Small Breasts and Brazil Prefers Butts: Lessons From Tittygram | | Observer

Title of article:




Excerpt:




If breast implants can release chemicals into the body that harm women (or men) it is good if breast implant rates go down. But I bet female breast implants for biological males, post 1950s, has skyrocketed upwards (not down) in rate. That is to9 say more biological males transition now to female than in the 1950s I would hazard a guess and more biological males today get female breast implants than biological males did in the 1950s. At least in the USA.

Another cosmetic chemical solution in the body it would be nice to see a decline in the rate of use of would be Synthol. A substance that is not on the decline but on the rise. I'm happy this stuff was not popular in the 1980s and 1990s. Women (some) want big breasts and men (some) want big arms and big chests.





This American gay man (he says he is homosexual and in his 50s) has shot synthol into his chest (kind of like breast implants for born women and m-to-f transsexual women). His Chest looks massive but abnormal and "swollen-like." He claims it is pretty safe. I'm doubting that.




Look how thin his neck is. Clearly unnatural and horrible for you. I feel sorry for those people, getting into it seems quite similar to other addictive substances that destroy the body.
 
Big breasted women have one advantage. When they get older and take their bra off all the wrinkles disappear from their face.
 
More than a mouthful is a waste. Ask any new infant. ;)
 
The average natural breast size for American women is a C-cup actually. So women getting breast implants didn't necessarily have "small" breasts. They just didn't have disproportionately huge breasts relative to their body size, or boobs that defy gravity. And for a while, that was the expectation.

I think perhaps women have decided that they don't care about that expectation anymore.
"Ideal" body image changes with the times. Always has, always will. What's popular today will probably not be 50 years from now.
 
Look how thin his neck is. Clearly unnatural and horrible for you. I feel sorry for those people, getting into it seems quite similar to other addictive substances that destroy the body.


To what extent it is an addiction or not I was focusing more on the aspect that humans (not merely people with XX chromosomes) tend to be concerned with their outward, physical, appearances.

I can talk about synthol (as opposed to merely substance in breast implants that may leak, or steroids, because I don't wait for a politician to give me a pill). Likewise, I can acknowledge biological males get female breast implants--and honestly they get female breast implants and female butt implants. Therefore, the feminist narrative of women only caring about their physical appearances, and getting breast implants, is false. Biological males are not decreasing in body image concern but skyrocketing in it. This includes m-to-f transsexuals. And I would roll the dice and bet there are twice or three times as many biological males undergoing cosmetic changes in body appearances to look like the opposite sex than there are females doing the same.

Women in Afghanistan and Vietnam and India are vastly under valued. If we could metaphorically consider women a "market." But in my view in the USA women as a market are so over valued women are a market bubble. Using that metaphor the rise of m-to-f transsexuals are a good for heterosexual men in that they help pull down the market value of women, or help to lead to a pop in the bubble. In part because m-to-f transsexuals due to life discrimination (women born women face little of it) have more empathy for males. Particularly those male victimized (like say... a Terry Crew's) and are less likely to demand men stay in the 1950s. First and foremost homosexual and bisexual males have the most empathy for males, secondly m-to-f transsexuals, third are both lesbian women and heterosexual beta males, and last are heterosexual women and alpha males (patriarchy itself is predicated on men vs men, not men vs women). Heterosexual women (lesbians and beta males to a lesser extent) demand men remain in the 1950s except when a 21st century attitude benefits feminist women.

So, in the 1950s mind set (and sleep pill for the matrix) biological males never have cared about their physical appearance and none have ever gotten female breast implants.




Take the 2 sexy looking m-to-f transsexuals that looks better than 90% of American women born women. The Brazilian transsexuals and porn stars that go under the working names of Sheylla Wandergirlt and Kessy Bittencour. In terms of sexual conduct they are everything most men dream of. Particularly Wandergirlt, she loves everything about being girly. And both have not only firm breast implants but by video appearances of the little degree their bottoms jiggled when slapped, it is apparent they both have butt implants too.

So, I'm saying, the most egalitarian and objective health statement can be this: irrespective of the biological sex you were born, just be aware that if you get breast implants, there is a potential health risk. Simple. Period.

That homo-feminist liberal speaking 2 faced (like nearly every homo-feminist does--and all homo-feminists are run by feminists not by homosexuals) also made a broad sweeping generalization about men preferring natural breasts to breast implants (what does that say about what men prefer when it comes to choosing to marry a transsexual vs a woman born female?). Because that statement was a 1950s mindset inherently demanding men remain in the 1950s to benefit feminist, it is loved and accepted by homo-feminists. But when in a different thread I said most men will have sex with a m-to-f transsexual but most (not all) men will not marry one because mot men (not all) to marry a woman that can get impregnated and give birth to their (the men) biological children, homo-feminist accused me of telling a lie out of prejudice against transsexuals.


So, you have Sheylla Wandergirlt and Kessy Bittencour (better looking than most American women, clearly better in bed than most American women too) both of whom have female breast implants and female butt implants. Jut like you have this male below who shot his shoulder up with synthol because humans (not merely people born with 2 X chromosomes) are often concerned about their outward, physical appearances. And it is increasing with XY chromosome humans while decreasing among XX chromosome humans.




 
The other thing is: the big breast thing (to the exclusion of most other physical aspects) was mainly a white American male thing.

Not all people of the world were that focused on large breasts. Brazilian were not. Most Latinos were not. Apparently, the Japanese are not. And most ethnic Black-American males never were. Like Brazilians and most Latinos, ethnic Black-American males have always been more butt-centric when it came to women.

Thanks to the spectacular shape of J-Lo's butt... she began a cultural conversion of most white American males. A culture that was once almost exclusively breast-centric.
 
The other thing is: the big breast thing (to the exclusion of most other physical aspects) was mainly a white American male thing.

Not all people of the world were that focused on large breasts. Brazilian were not. Most Latinos were not. Apparently, the Japanese are not. And most ethnic Black-American males never were. Like Brazilians and most Latinos, ethnic Black-American males have always been more butt-centric when it came to women.

Thanks to the spectacular shape of J-Lo's butt... she began a cultural conversion of most white American males. A culture that was once almost exclusively breast-centric.

I find her butt to be repulsive.
 
What? Did big tits change size? All the smaller tits I’ve seen are still small, and just as lovely, beguiling and alluring as they ever were. Big clits?, now we’re talkin’.
 
Oh come ON!

Yes I need my fun.

This is a serious legit question.

I gotta know cause the answer impacts my life.

Do your own research. Stand in the street with a clipboard and interview persons of an apparent female persuasion.

Do let us know how you get on.
 
Back
Top Bottom