• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Guy Win's Women's Tour de Tucson

1 million among 300 million is not, especially since they aren't going to be uniform in thought or action.

My original position here stands. It's up to the governing body of the event\sport to decide what's fair play.

If sponsors, participants, or spectators don't like the rules they set, they can appeal to them or withdraw their support.

And current athletes have appealed to them to no avail. Also, it's simply a fact that allowing some competitors to use performance enhancing drugs like testosterone and estrogen blockers but not other is not fair play.
 
It's less about "transsexuals" than it is men having huge advantages over women in physical sport. In general, women cannot compete with men effectively. That's why male world records are, with very rare exception, always beyond the reach of women.

Nah. Don't believe you calamity. Your attitudes to transsexuals are on record in this forum. You could try to have a reasonable discussion to persuade the forum that you have a different attitude to transsexuals than the obvious one that runs like poison through your posts but, I doubt you will.
 
And current athletes have appealed to them to no avail. Also, it's simply a fact that allowing some competitors to use performance enhancing drugs like testosterone and estrogen blockers but not other is not fair play.

And you have yet to show that they have. We have several people that seem to be self appointed spokespersons for the cycling sisterhood but, not much actual evidence that there is outrage.

Come on 'jane' you know you can do it.
 
And you have yet to show that they have. We have several people that seem to be self appointed spokespersons for the cycling sisterhood but, not much actual evidence that there is outrage.

Come on 'jane' you know you can do it.

I don't know if any of the cyclists complained, but I know that many women in the MMA complained about the MTF in their sport.
 
And current athletes have appealed to them to no avail. Also, it's simply a fact that allowing some competitors to use performance enhancing drugs like testosterone and estrogen blockers but not other is not fair play.

I haven't seen any links to that effect, but I'll take your word for it.

The organizations that make the rule decide what is and isn't fair play. It sounds like their grievances were heard.

Sometimes that's the best you get.
 
Nah. Don't believe you calamity. Your attitudes to transsexuals are on record in this forum. You could try to have a reasonable discussion to persuade the forum that you have a different attitude to transsexuals than the obvious one that runs like poison through your posts but, I doubt you will.

I'm pretty consistent in being against men pretending to be women than I am women who say they are men. So, no.
 
I'm pretty consistent in being against men pretending to be women than I am women who say they are men. So, no.

Yes, your prejudice is one consistent thing about you.
 
Back
Top Bottom