Pretty much no one disagrees.
If the article's language and message were aimed at girls and women, telling them how to effectively respond to unwanted advances from potentially dangerous men (like, for example, telling your freaking father when a G.D. leering pedophile barges into your room unnanounced, regardless of what it does to 'the party' downstairs), I wouldn't have a problem with it. However, that's rather clearly not its intent.
It generalizes and basically tries to imply that all men share blame for the actions of a small minority of creeps. It does so in an extremely heavy-handed and moralistic manner. What's more beyond even that, it's basically made in such a way as to deliberately encourage being "put on blast" over social media, so as to mass inundate people with its message, and allow certain kinds of people to flaunt their self-proclaimed "virtue" in doing so.
I'm sorry, but that's just obnoxious on multiple different levels.
Again, the vast majority of men already know this. Those that don't generally have something wrong with them, so they're not going to be dissuaded by an internet blog post anyway.
First off, we have no idea what Trump did or did not do. All we know is that he made some hyperbolic statements in a private conversation once.
Secondly, even if he did do such a thing, Trump (or Bill Clinton, for that matter) is hardly representative of the behavior of most men.