• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Truth About Sluts

Celebrity said:
you can call it rape or no fault divorce.
Click to expand...

According to SJWs, false accusations are very rare:

However, in the United States, the FBI Uniform Crime Report in 1996 and the United States Department of Justice in 1997 reported that 8% of the rape accusations had been through investigation determined to be false
Click to expand...

and 16% are determined to be true. No person knows what percentage of the 76% of unproved accusations are false.

PS. The majority of men and women are neither rapists nor false accusers nor abusers. Most people are decent.
 
SCitizen said:
Most people are decent.
Click to expand...

Most people would do well to learn the rules and steadfastly adhere to them, regardless of their moral basis or ethical implementation. That is called "privilege," and unfortunately we do not extend sexual privilege to women, because women decide to create children.
 
TheGoverness said:
I personally don't have much of a problem with slutty women/men.
Click to expand...

It's overall bad for an individual and society as a whole. Almost every single slut I've know Male and Female are using sex to fullfill their own insecurities and past issues. Having sex with tons of people is dangerous behavior that can result in a permanent STD and even a child with someone you never would have intended to have one with. No matter what people try to do, sex is a very intimate encounter... training yourself to make it not so, and often playing with peoples emotions is destructive behavior.

I'm not saying to ban people from having sex... I am saying it is objectively not a good idea... and if I have a son or daughter I would do my best to teach them the wisdom to not find that lifestyle appealing. You should always carefully choose and know the people you have sex with.

My personal experience, I tried the whole slutting around thing... and it's very empty and dangerous.

Why people are more concerned about woman? It's because woman have children. If they get knocked up or given an STD by a random douchbag, it SEVERELY impacts a woman's life. It severely impacts a man's life as well, but our society doesn't care about men, it doesn't care to lead when away from poor life choices.... in fact society encourages poor life choices in men.
 
celticwar17 said:
If they get knocked up or given an STD by a random douchbag, it SEVERELY impacts a woman's life.
Click to expand...

No, it biologically impacts a woman's life. Let's not get too carried away. Epidemiology and reproduction are both biological and social phenomena, yet the only true difference between men and women that I can see is biological.
 
Celebrity said:
No, it biologically impacts a woman's life. Let's not get too carried away. Epidemiology and reproduction are both biological and social phenomena, yet the only true difference between men and women that I can see is biological.
Click to expand...

what? I don't understand the point of your distinction.
It not only biologically impacts a woman's life but also mentally... speak with any psychologist or doctor on what is unhealthy sexual behavior. It biologically impacts a man's life if he gets an STD and if the woman become pregnant... she could then also legally screw him over.
 
celticwar17 said:
what? I don't understand the point of your distinction.
It not only biologically impacts a woman's life but also mentally... speak with any psychologist or doctor on what is unhealthy sexual behavior. It biologically impacts a man's life if he gets an STD and if the woman become pregnant... she could then also legally screw him over.
Click to expand...

Allow me to explain. I do not believe that saying "I have a vagina, therefore I make the rules" is socially or legally any different than saying, "I have a penis, therefore I make the rules." Yes, women can legally screw over men. Yet the only true difference between men and women is biological, so why do we prioritize women over men? I believe that in the same way we don't extend sexual privilege to women, we extend special legal privileges to women that are oppressive of men. Within the context of sexual promiscuity, future parenthood is not a legal risk of women, however it is an ethical risk for both men and women.

In society, we commonly use financial matters to justify financial matters. Take the income tax, for example. It is a financial tax based on a financial matter (income). The vagina tax, on the other hand, is bleeding out biological justifications into financial matters. This type of quid-pro-quo arrangement is illogical and relies heavily on appeals to emotion and authority. We want to know what is the right thing to do, and we want to keep doing it right.

So, if women want to be treated as equals, they should stop supporting a legal system which is oppressive of men on a sexual basis.
 
Celebrity said:
Allow me to explain. I do not believe that saying "I have a vagina, therefore I make the rules" is socially or legally any different than saying, "I have a penis, therefore I make the rules." Yes, women can legally screw over men. Yet the only true difference between men and women is biological, so why do we prioritize women over men? I believe that in the same way we don't extend sexual privilege to women, we extend special legal privileges to women that are oppressive of men. Within the context of sexual promiscuity, future parenthood is not a legal risk of women, however it is an ethical risk for both men and women.

In society, we commonly use financial matters to justify financial matters. Take the income tax, for example. It is a financial tax based on a financial matter (income). The vagina tax, on the other hand, is bleeding out biological justifications into financial matters. This type of quid-pro-quo arrangement is illogical and relies heavily on appeals to emotion and authority. We want to know what is the right thing to do, and we want to keep doing it right.

So, if women want to be treated as equals, they should stop supporting a legal system which is oppressive of men on a sexual basis.
Click to expand...
I think I might have misunderstood you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom