• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The "Gay Agenda"[W:504]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Being gay itself is no more or less risky than being straight, having unprotected sex is more risky for gay men due to many factors, and that is why it is important to have comprehensive sex education that talks about the facts, not disparages sex altogether, making it a taboo and completely pointless for discussing reality. The reality is that people have sex, they have many partners, even heterosexuals (in fact, it is considered much more taboo for women to have multiple partners, just look at the reaction I got for disclosing mine). That isn't what causes STDs/HIV to spread. Unsafe sexual practices, including not using protection, not knowing your partner, and not knowing your own health is what puts anyone in danger of contracting STDs/HIV.

This line of discussion originated with the Bible being against homosexuality. It is also against promiscuity. In fact, the Bible says men should not stray from their wives and concubines. My guess is it has much to do with spread of disease. Marry a virgin, have a stable of concubines that no one else has access to...disease is no longer an issue.
 
This line of discussion originated with the Bible being against homosexuality. It is also against promiscuity. In fact, the Bible says men should not stray from their wives and concubines. My guess is it has much to do with spread of disease. Marry a virgin, have a stable of concubines that no one else has access to...disease is no longer an issue.

Your theories are laughable.
 
Their guys...odds are monogamy is not high on our list, even though many of us end up doing it as a condition to stay married. But, I doubt we would if not forced to.

Sad. I think it says more about you than gays.
 
This line of discussion originated with the Bible being against homosexuality. It is also against promiscuity. In fact, the Bible says men should not stray from their wives and concubines. My guess is it has much to do with spread of disease. Marry a virgin, have a stable of concubines that no one else has access to...disease is no longer an issue.

I don't care what the Bible says. Much of it took place over 2000 years ago, long before they knew about how such things passed from one person to another, testing for the disease, or about how to protect themselves from such things besides banning people from being together or insisting people live under highly restrictive rules.
 
I don't care what the Bible says. Much of it took place over 2000 years ago, long before they knew about how such things passed from one person to another, testing for the disease, or about how to protect themselves from such things besides banning people from being together or insisting people live under highly restrictive rules.

There was a logical reason for making homosexuality taboo...I'm sure God didn't tell them to do so.
 
There was a logical reason for making homosexuality taboo...I'm sure God didn't tell them to do so.

Even if there was a rational reason for them to do it then, that doesn't mean we can't or shouldn't move on from that position now that we have much more information about the world around us and many changes to our way of life, in many, many areas. It is kind of like the entire no mixed fabrics thing. There is no reason to be for this today, even if it is possible that in the past they had a reason to support such a rule.
 
So is the gay agenda.

There is no gay agenda other than the fight for equality. If that is what you mean by agenda then the "gay agenda" is no different than every other "agenda" seen through the course history.
 
Last edited:
There is no gay agenda other than the fight for equality. If that is what you mean by agenda then the "gay agenda" is no different than every other "agenda" seen through the course history.

Lol, your silly argument that AIDS has nothing to do with gays disproves your claim that there is no gay agenda. When facts are systemically denied like we see in the "gay sex poses no more risk of AIDS than hetero sex" meme, your claim that there is no gay agenda becomes a joke.
 
Even if there was a rational reason for them to do it then, that doesn't mean we can't or shouldn't move on from that position now that we have much more information about the world around us and many changes to our way of life, in many, many areas. It is kind of like the entire no mixed fabrics thing. There is no reason to be for this today, even if it is possible that in the past they had a reason to support such a rule.
Had AIDS not popped up to kill millions, mostly gay men, you may have had a point. But, alas it did. So, now your argument rings hollow...and it might even be the reason AIDS is on the rise again.
 
Lol, your silly argument that AIDS has nothing to do with gays disproves your claim that there is no gay agenda.

The contraction of AID has nothing to do with homosexuality. When I asked you to provide the biologic link between aids and homosexuality you couldn't do so. You just keep pasting the same link that doesn't say what you want it to say. You are hell bent on your smeer campaign against the lgbt. That is YOUR agenda, obviously.

when facts are systemically denied like we see in the "gay sex poses no more risk of AIDS than hetero sex" meme

Anal sex poses a higher risk of HIV contraction. It has nothing to with whether the individual who is engaging in anal sex is homosexual or not. Your own sources explain this to you.

your claim that there is no gay agenda becomes a joke.

There isn't one - you keep fabricating these narrrative but your arguments are so easy to dismantle and dismiss.
 
Last edited:
The contraction of AID has nothing to do with homosexuality. When I asked you to provide the biologic link between aids and homosexuality you couldn't so. You just keep pasting the same link that doesn't say what you want it to say. You are hell bent on your smeer campaign againt the lgbt. That is YOUR agenda, obviously.



Anal sex poses a higher risk of HIV contraction. It has nothing to with whether the individual who is engaging in anal sex is homosexual or not. Your own sources explain this to you.



There isn't one - you keep fabricating these narrrative but your arguments are so easy to dismantle and dismiss.

Right, the fact that 72% of the people getting infected with AIDs in the US are gay means nothing to those promoting the gay agenda. We know.
 
Right, the fact that 72% of the people getting infected with AIDs in the US are gay means nothing to those promoting the gay agenda.

It has nothing to do with them being homosexual. It is because of unprotected sex.
 
Lol, your silly argument that AIDS has nothing to do with gays disproves your claim that there is no gay agenda. When facts are systemically denied like we see in the "gay sex poses no more risk of AIDS than hetero sex" meme, your claim that there is no gay agenda becomes a joke.

The facts are that as of 2012 there were around 35 million people with HIV and in the preceding 11 years approximately 2 million people a year died from AIDS related illness. The majority of transmissions of the virus were through heterosexual contact, this was the evidence in 2007 https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=H4Sv9XY296oC&pg=PA745&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false. I have not seen anything that contradicts this.
 
Lol, your silly argument that AIDS has nothing to do with gays disproves your claim that there is no gay agenda. When facts are systemically denied like we see in the "gay sex poses no more risk of AIDS than hetero sex" meme, your claim that there is no gay agenda becomes a joke.

There's an agenda, but it's not the for the Gays.

Oh and btw, if AIDS is a gay thing, then why are you so concerned about catching it?
 
HIV really doesn't have to exist. It's the kind of virus that we could wipe out. I mean we got rid of small pox and foot and mouth disease. Their back now from 3rd world immigration but they were way easier to get than HIV. Sadly there's a lot of gay men who couldn't care less if they catch it.
 
There's an agenda, but it's not the for the Gays.

Oh and btw, if AIDS is a gay thing, then why are you so concerned about catching it?

The thread is about the gay agenda. One thing the G/A does is obfuscate. Downplaying risk of AIDs as compared to straights is at the top of that list. It began back in the 80's when they whined and managed to do away with the name GRID
 
The thread is about the gay agenda. One thing the G/A does is obfuscate. Downplaying risk of AIDs as compared to straights is at the top of that list. It began back in the 80's when they whined and managed to do away with the name GRID

There is no gay agenda. The Gays are currently being used as cannon fodder or a "scapegoat" by the progressive left agenda. The far Right (more commonly known as the centre Right), are also using this minority as a scapegoat at the moment. The establishment thanks them.

But why are you so worried about gay men not being educated on AIDS enough?
 
No I'm not.

why, cause of using protection? Well there you go, the same tools that can be used to ward off stds

or perhaps i should've phrased it "heterosexuals are"

the hetero agenda: convincing us that the hetero lifestyle is normal as a way to avoid paying child support and convert unsuspecting children to their side - this is how asinine the "gay agenda" theorists sound
 
There is no gay agenda. The Gays are currently being used as cannon fodder or a "scapegoat" by the progressive left agenda. The far Right (more commonly known as the centre Right), are also using this minority as a scapegoat at the moment. The establishment thanks them.

But why are you so worried about gay men not being educated on AIDS enough?

Gay agenda and Prog Left agenda work in concert, just like the Religious Right and the Far Right.

Uh, gee, maybe because the spread of disease is a bad thing. :roll:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom