Probably. Judging from what I've seen on the National Geographic channel, however; I do think tNuffhat a certain degree of "wear and tear" would probably be inevitable.
Awww, I thought you weren't talking to me anymore? :lol:
Studies which blatantly show that men are more prone to aggressive behavior, less prone to emotional behavior, and generally rely upon the analytical sides of their brains more than women, do not prove that men are generally more aggressive than women, less emotional, and more prone to look upon the world in strictly analytical ways which fall in line with the archetype of "masculine" behavior?
You sure about that? Lol
And what proof, or Hell, even evidence, have you presented, Clax? :roll:
A) You didn't answer my question. Provide evidence to support your claim that Matriarchy exists immediately or concede the point.
B) I
dare you to provide a single instance of me ever saying that culture "doesn't exist."
I didn't say a damn thing about anyone being "superior."
I said that gender roles tended to be more or less constant across cultural lines, even in societies in where women hold social power greater or equal power to that of men.
Undoubtedly. However, men are
always going to be men, and women and
always going to be women regardless of any concept of "culture." They always have been and always will be.
Again, these things are well nigh universal, even in "cultures" which are not as strictly "patriarchal" as our own.
In other words,
"I'm right because I say so, and NANANANANANANANANA I can't heaaaaaaarrrr youuuu!!! "
And if you'd actually read the sources I'd posted, you'd realize that men have women beat in this regard as well.
Do men and women feel pain differently?
Scientific facts aren't going to go away simply because you happen to dislike them, Clax.
We're talking about reality here, Clax, not that screaming bag of hyperactive wet cats you seem to call an imagination. :roll:
I'm quaking in my boots, I'm sure.
It's kind of hard to be intimidated by someone you could flip over your shoulder and casually stroll away with. As a matter of fact, I've done so with particularly feisty women on more than a few occasions.
No, they have roughly
equal lower body strength to a man,
on a pound per pound basis. It doesn't change the fact that they tend to have a lot fewer pounds to throw around than most men in the first place.
Lower body strength is also not as important to the matter we were discussing here (i.e. domestic violence and rape) as upper body strength.
I'm sure they can overpower you easily enough.
Clearly, she shouldn't have done that.
