• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Provocative French Short Film Examines Sexism via Gender Role Reversal

CLAX1911 said:
More immature insults from you doesn'tprove your case.

When you are done insulting me and can put together a coherent thought. But until then I am not interested in reading your posts, there is nothing new. Just you insisting you're right with nothing to prove it.

Your game is silly immature and old.
Click to expand...

And, again, coming from a man who still has of yet to provide a single damn source or scrap of hard evidence support any of his claims, this accusation is patently hilarious.
 
Gathomas88 said:
And, again, coming from a man who still has of yet to provide a single damn source or scrap of hard evidence support any of his claims, this accusation is patently hilarious.
Click to expand...
Why? You have failed to prove otherwise. Right now it's unfounded claim vs. Unfounded claim. And you are hateful and insulting.

Really the insults you post because your argument fails are more telling than anything I could post.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Why? You have failed to prove otherwise. Right now it's unfounded claim vs. Unfounded claim. And you are hateful and insulting.

Really the insults you post because your argument fails are more telling than anything I could post.
Click to expand...

Again, a man who clearly doesn't even understand how "debate" is supposed to work trying to tell anyone that their arguments "fail" is patently hilarious.

You want respect from me? Argue better.

That's all there is to it.
 
Gathomas88 said:
Again, a man who clearly doesn't even understand that concept "debate" trying to tell anyone that their arguments "fail" is patently hilarious.
Click to expand...
If your argument didn't fail why are you still arguing with me?
You want respect from me? Argue better.
Click to expand...
You can't even respect yourself. You destroyed any credibility you ever had by your immature name calling. The idea that you think you disrespected me is hilarious.
That's all there is to it.
Click to expand...
Pretty much.
 
CLAX1911 said:
If your argument didn't fail why are you still arguing with me?
Click to expand...

Why are you still posting if you don't have anything of substance to offer?

Why post on "Debate Politics" at all if you're not willing to actually debate anything?

Are you simply trolling here, or what?

You destroyed any credibility you ever had by your immature name calling.
Click to expand...

Again, coming from the guy who basically flat out said "I don't have to post sources because I know I'm right" any comment regarding "credibility" is patently hilarious.
 
Gathomas88 said:
Why are you still posting if you don't have anything of substance to offer?
Click to expand...
I did, you just didn't like it.
Why post on "Debate Politics" at all if you're not willing to actually debate anything?
Click to expand...
Good question it's more aptly adressed to you however.
Are you simply trolling here, or what?
Click to expand...
You are the one that believed you proved something and stuck around to call me names for making holes in it. So it would appear not.

The only reason I am posting to you now is to prove to anybody else that your assumptions are just that. The name calling. and immaturity you have presented has proved not only that but also that you are a sore loser.

Again, coming from the guy who basically flat out said "I don't have to post sources because I know I'm right" any comment regarding "credibility" is patently hilarious.
Click to expand...
You are the one saying I am wrong, now a good debator would simply post why I was and move on.

You either believe you have posted proof and simply desire talking down to people meaning you are an arrogant immature poor debator, or the hole in your argument is to big for you to continue to ignore and you are angry with me for pointing it out. Which also proves you to be a poor debator.
 
CLAX1911 said:
I did, you just didn't like it.
Good question it's more aptly adressed to you however.
You are the one that believed you proved something and stuck around to call me names for making holes in it. So it would appear not.

The only reason I am posting to you now is to prove to anybody else that your assumptions are just that. The name calling. and immaturity you have presented has proved not only that but also that you are a sore loser.

You are the one saying I am wrong, now a good debator would simply post why I was and move on.

You either believe you have posted proof and simply desire talking down to people meaning you are an arrogant immature poor debator, or the hole in your argument is to big for you to continue to ignore and you are angry with me for pointing it out. Which also proves you to be a poor debator.
Click to expand...

Again, Clax, the simple fact of the matter here is that you apparently have no Earthly idea HOW. TO. ARGUE.

"I'm right because I say I am, and have to prove nothing. If you disagree, feel free to **** right the Hell off" is not in any way a "rational," "mature," or "intelligent" approach to civil discourse. It is childish, pig headed, and petulant in the extreme, and would have you thrown out of any respectable institution in a heart beat.

Even Sangha and AgentJ, for all their numerous faults, manage to throw out a half-way credible source every now and then. You, apparently, can't even manage that much.

You're trolling alright. I'm just not entirely sure whether you're capable of recognizing this reality or not.

Your debate style and way of thinking are so completely backwards and out of left field that I'm really not even sure if you can be held accountable for your actions in this regard. :lol:
 
Last edited:
Gathomas88 said:
Again, Clax, the simple fact of the matter here is that you apparently have no Earthly idea HOW. TO. ARGUE.
Click to expand...
That says more about you than me because you have been arguing with me for three days.
"I'm right because I say I am, and have to prove nothing. If you disagree, feel free to f*ck right the Hell off" is not in any way a "rational," "mature," or "intelligent" approach to civil discourse.
Click to expand...
I agree, you should alter your approach.
It is childish, pig headed, and petulant in the extreme,
Click to expand...
A good reason to adjust your approach.
and would have you thrown out of any respectable institution in a heart beat.
Click to expand...
Funny, it never has. I have been called into court several times and my testimony has never caused someone to walk.
Even Sangha and AgentJ, for all their numerous faults, manage to throw out a half-way credible source every now and then. You, apparently, can't even manage that much.
Click to expand...
That approach doesn't work with you. See I debate the person. It seems to be working just fine. I have you right where I want you. Debate isn't about sources, it's about persuasion. You are unpersuadable. I don't wish to be Sisyphus, you however seem content in that place.

My debate style has flustered you and caused you to insult me and resort to name calling. and hyperbole. I have had debates with people just like you and nobody is ever persuaded by your tactic. The only people that would agree with you would have already thus you have persuaded nobody.
You're trolling alright. I'm just not entirely sure whether you're even capable of recognizing this reality or not.
Click to expand...
You have matched me post for post so apparently you are also trolling if I am.

Your debate style and way of thinking is so completely backwards and out of left field that I'm not sure if you can even really be held accountable for your actions in this regard. :lol:
Click to expand...
Ha ha ha ha ha, works every time.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Funny, it never has. I have been called into court several times and my testimony has never caused someone to walk.
Click to expand...

Which isn't a "debate." :roll:

Again, do you know what the word even means?

That approach doesn't work with you. See I debate the person. It seems to be working just fine. I have you right where I want you. Debate isn't about sources, it's about persuasion. You are unpersuadable. I don't wish to be Sisyphus, you however seem content in that place.
Click to expand...

I rest my case. You not only don't know how to argue, but you fail to understand the very concept.

In a nut shell, you basically just said that you don't think it matters whether you are factually correct or not, because all that matters to you is convincing the other person that you are right. You then went on to say that, because this approach was not working on me (because it doesn't make any damn sense, FYI), you were now simply trying to annoy me for the Hell of it.

Serious question: Are you high? wtf.gif

Ya know what? Just go ahead and put me on ignore. We have nothing further to discuss. EVER.

This kind of insane anti-logic beggars belief.

My debate style has flustered you and caused you to insult me and resort to name calling. and hyperbole.

...

Ha ha ha ha ha, works every time.
Click to expand...

Translation: You're trolling.
 
Last edited:
Gathomas88 said:
Which isn't a "debate." :roll:

Again, do you know what the word even means?
Click to expand...
When I did debate in college I used the same tactic. Works every time.


I rest my case. You not only don't know how to argue, but you fail to understand the very concept.
Click to expand...
correction I don't agree the way you want me to making your argument ineffective and it frustrates you to the point of hyperbole.
In a nut shell, you basically just said that you don't think it matters whether you are factually correct or not, because all that matters to you is convincing the other person that you are right.
Click to expand...
Incorrect, the other person will likely never think that the debator is right. Think of political debates does the opponent ever shake hands with his rival and say "you beat me, everybody vote for the other guy."? I don't give a flying **** about convincing you because regardless of any sources I post you will not be convinced. Boy you have a lot to learn about debate.
You then went on to say that, because this approach was not working on me (because it doesn't make any damn sense, FYI), you were now simply trying to annoy me for the Hell of it.
Click to expand...
No I am really trying to educate you. You are getting annoyed on your own accord.
Serious question: Are you high? View attachment 67162146
Click to expand...
Never touch the stuff, that is the hyperbole thatI was talking about. If you are right just simply know that. Don't get mad at me because you don't believe your own Bull****.
Ya know what? Just go ahead and put me on ignore. We have nothing further to discuss. EVER.
Click to expand...
I don't Everett put anybody on ignore. If you have nothing further to discuss than stop posting to me.
This kind of insane anti-logic beggars belief.
Click to expand...
Seems to work against you every time.


Translation: You're trolling.
Click to expand...
"When the debate is lost slander becomes the weapon of the loser."- Socrates

So who is guilty of slander?
 
CLAX1911 said:
When I did debate in college I used the same tactic. Works every time.
Click to expand...

I don't believe for a single second that you ever debated in a serious context.

correction I don't agree the way you want me to making your argument ineffective and it frustrates you to the point of hyperbole.
Click to expand...

Yes, your inclination towards flagrantly bull****ting, evading serious arguments, and refusing to post sources or hard evidence to support your claims does tend to make any attempt at serious discussion "ineffective."

That's not something to be proud of.

Incorrect, the other person will likely never think that the debator is right. Think of political debates does the opponent ever shake hands with his rival and say "you beat me, everybody vote for the other guy."? I don't give a flying **** about convincing you because regardless of any sources I post you will not be convinced. Boy you have a lot to learn about debate.
Click to expand...

Again, you've basically just flat out admitted that you're not debating on the basis of what is actually true. You're debating to try and score imaginary points in your own head.

i.e. You are trolling.

I am calling you on it.

If you are right just simply know that.
Click to expand...

And here you simply further demonstrate why you have absolutely no business whatsoever being within ten feet of a debate website.

Why don't you take your own advice and simply "know you are right" someplace else? :roll:

Some of us are actually here to seriously discuss topics and bounce ideas back and forth, not to play at stroking our own egos.

Don't get mad at me because you don't believe your own Bull****.
Click to expand...

To the contrary, I argue NOTHING that I do not believe to be true, or that I cannot provide factual, logical proofs and evidence to defend.

You seem to be arguing purely for the sake of being argumentative.

So who is guilty of slander?
Click to expand...

And what did Socrates have to say about sophists like yourself, Clax?
 
Last edited:
Gathomas88 said:
I don't believe for a single second that you ever debated in a serious context.
Click to expand...
I don't care.

Yes, flagrantly bull****ting and evading serious arguments does tend to make any attempt at serious discussion "ineffective."
Click to expand...
Yet you insist on continuing.
That's not something to be proud of.
Click to expand...
I am proud of my husband. I don't use pride for self gratification or ego stroking.


Again, you've basically just flat out admitted that you're not debating on the basis of what is actually true. You're debating to try and score imaginary points in your own head.
Click to expand...
Okay, you are lying to yourself if you believe you are debating for any other reason.
i.e. You are trolling.

I am calling you on it.
Click to expand...
So are you.


And here you simply further demonstrate why you have absolutely no business whatsoever even being within ten feet of a debate website.
Click to expand...
Tough luck, you aren't the debate website police.
Why don't you take your own advice and simply "know you are right" someplace else? :roll:
Click to expand...
Why don't you?
Some of us are actually here to seriously discuss topics and bounce ideas back and forth, not to play at stroking our own egos.
Click to expand...
That doesn't work if you reject and name call. That is not apparently why you are here.


To the contrary, I argue NOTHING that I do not believe to be true, or that I cannot provide factual, logical proofs and evidence to defend.
Click to expand...
False.
You seem to be arguing purely for the sake of being argumentative.
Click to expand...
nope, not my motive.


And what did Socrates have to say about Sophists like yourself, Clax?
Click to expand...
Another insult.
 
CLAX1911 said:
I don't care.

Yet you insist on continuing.
I am proud of my husband. I don't use pride for self gratification or ego stroking.


Okay, you are lying to yourself if you believe you are debating for any other reason.
So are you.


Tough luck, you aren't the debate website police.
Why don't you?
That doesn't work if you reject and name call. That is not apparently why you are here.


False.
nope, not my motive.



Another insult.
Click to expand...

Whatever you say, Clax. The simple fact of the matter is that you're evasive, dishonest, and don't understand how to argue a point without turning the discussion into a gridlocked filibuster where facts and evidence cease to matter and neither side is capable of doing anything but blustering back and forth with empty rhetoric.

Your arguments are intellectual voids, and you have even flat out admitted that you argue more for the purposes of "persuasion" and playing "gotcha" with opponents than achieving enlightenment or understanding.

Give me a single good reason why I, or anyone else on this board, should waste another second of their time trying to reason with you.
 
Last edited:
Gathomas88 said:
Whatever you say, Clax. The simple fact of the matter is that you're an evasive troll who doesn't understand how to argue a point without turning the discussion into a gridlocked filibuster where facts and evidence cease to matter and neither side is capable of doing anything but blustering back and forth with empty rhetoric.
Click to expand...
Still calling names. Look I am sorry you can't handle debate. And the only rhetoric that is present is your hyperbole and immature name calling.
You're intellectually dishonest, and you have even flat out admitted that you argue more for the purposes of "persuasion" and playing "gotcha" with opponents than enlightenment or understanding.
Click to expand...
I promise emperor your clothes are beautiful and Ican see them.
Give me a single good reason why anyone on this board should waste another second of their time on you.
Click to expand...
You give me a reason. since you seem to be utterly infatuated with me. I am sorry I am taken.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Still calling names. Look I am sorry you can't handle debate. And the only rhetoric that is present is your hyperbole and immature name calling.
Click to expand...

Yet more expert debate tactics from the esteemed college "debater." :roll:

Troll all you want, Clax. It makes no difference to me.

It certainly doesn't change the fact that you are apparently completely incapable of defending your arguments without resorting to personal attacks and dishonest evasion of actual rebuttals. As I told you before, you lost this debate all the way back on page two.

You simply haven't realized it yet.

You give me a reason. since you seem to be utterly infatuated with me. I am sorry I am taken.
Click to expand...

You're yesterday's news, Clax. I've had you six ways from Sunday in this thread already.

Your performance was lack luster enough the first time around, thank you kindly. ;)
 
Gathomas88 said:
Yet more expert debate tactics from the esteemed college "debater."
Click to expand...
Finally some recognition. But just because I am better than you didn't make me an expert.
Troll all you want, Clax. It makes no difference to me.
Click to expand...
Call me a troll all you wish it doesn't make your argument any stronger.
It certainly doesn't change the fact that you are apparently completely incapable of defending your arguments without resorting to personal attacks and dishonest evasion of actual rebuttals. As I told you before, you lost this debate all the way back on page two.
Click to expand...
What personal attacks?




You're yesterday's news, Clax. I've had you six ways from Sunday in this thread already.
Click to expand...
You dwell on yesterdays news an aweful lot.
Your performance was lack luster enough the first time around, thank you kindly. ;)
Click to expand...
Your insults are becoming more meaningless.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Finally some recognition. But just because I am better than you didn't make me an expert.
Click to expand...

That's cute. You apparently struggle with sarcasm as well.

Call me a troll all you wish it doesn't make your argument any stronger.
Click to expand...

At least I have an argument. :roll:

What personal attacks?
Click to expand...

Let's take a look. Shall we?

CLAX1911 said:
Boy, please keep talking the more of your nonsense I read the more I realize you have no clue.
Click to expand...

CLAX1911 said:
You think you can fight off three women? I bet one could kick your ass.
Click to expand...

CLAX1911 said:
You are the fellow in the box. These facts are completely irrelevant.
Click to expand...

CLAX1911 said:
You really like being in your box don't you?
Click to expand...

CLAX1911 said:
:lamo. You haven't a clue.
Click to expand...

CLAX1911 said:
Go pick a fight with a lady, btw enjoy having your ass handed to you.
Click to expand...

CLAX1911 said:
Real life is going to hit you like a concrete truck one day.
Click to expand...

CLAX1911 said:
Oooo a tough guy. They always eat crow.
Click to expand...

CLAX1911 said:
Standard ape like mentality, how hard one can beat his own chest it's not a measure of strength.
Click to expand...

CLAX1911 said:
Gathomas was far too caught up in his gender identity crisis to understand the reason for that.
Click to expand...

CLAX1911 said:
You are so confused with your gender identity crisis you started ranting and raving about it not being realistic.
Click to expand...

Keep in mind these were all before I started the thread downstairs as well.

Face it, Clax. You were being hyper-aggressive and pissy because I was beating you. Now, you're trying to turn things around and pretend like you're some sort of victim because you got your feelings hurt that I called you out on your B.S. downstairs.

Your dishonest tactics are so outwardly transparent as to be laughable. You started this pissing contest, not me.

It's hardly my problem if you can't handle the taste of your own medicine.

You dwell on yesterdays news an aweful lot.
Click to expand...

For some strange reason, it won't stay in the past where it belongs.

Your insults are becoming more meaningless.
Click to expand...

Like your non-existent arguments? :roll:
 
Gathomas88 said:
That's cute. You apparently struggle with sarcasm as well.
Click to expand...
I'd say it's pretty spot on sarcasm.


At least I have an argument.
Click to expand...
Bull**** isn't an argument.


Let's take a look. Shall we?
Click to expand...
No worse than you.






















Keep in mind these were all before I started the thread downstairs as well.
Click to expand...
Only in response to your personal attacks.
Face it, Clax. You were being hyper-aggressive and pissy
because I was beating you. Now, you're trying to turn things around and pretend like you're some sort of victim because you got your feelings hurt that I called you out on your B.S. downstairs.
Click to expand...
:lamo
Your dishonest tactics are so outwardly transparent as to be laughable. You started this pissing contest, not me.
Click to expand...
No contest.
It's hardly my problem if you can't handle the taste of your own medicine.
Click to expand...
:shrug:


For some strange reason, it won't stay in the past where it belongs.
Click to expand...
Because you dwell on it.


Like your non-existent arguments? :roll:
Click to expand...
You sure are desperate to argue with something that doesn't exist.
 
CLAX1911 said:
I'd say it's pretty spot on sarcasm.
Click to expand...

It was, which is why it is so laughable that you would miss it. :lol:

Bull**** isn't an argument.
Click to expand...

Why is why I present factual sources to support my arguments, unlike you, who relies upon bull**** exclusively.

Only in response to your personal attacks.
Click to expand...

Oh yea, factual sources proving you wrong are so offensive! Not. :roll:

:lamo
Click to expand...

I'm glad to see that you can laugh at yourself, Clax. It's one of your rare better qualities. ;)

Because you dwell on it.
Click to expand...

Which is why you continue posting, in spite of the fact that you basically lost this argument back on page two when you failed to present any evidence to refute my own sources disproving your arguments, right?

You sure are desperate to argue with something that doesn't exist.
Click to expand...

It's kind of funny watching you squirm.
 
Gathomas88 said:
It was, which is why it is so laughable that you would miss it.



Why is why I present factual sources to support my arguments, unlike you, who relies upon bull**** exclusively.



Oh yea, factual sources proving you wrong are so offensive! Not. :roll:



I'm glad to see that you can laugh at yourself, Clax. It's one of your rare better qualities. ;)



Which is why you continue posting, in spite of the fact that you basically lost this argument back on page two when you failed to present any evidence to refute my own sources disproving your arguments, right?



It's kind of funny watching you squirm.
Click to expand...
:yawn:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom