• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Aether

P

Palandro

Banned
Joined
Jul 1, 2020
Messages
342
Reaction score
8
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Thanks to the ridiculous and extremely stupid and therefore wrong theories of the plagiarist called ein-stein ( meaning just one half of a brain ;) ), the aether was abandoned.
However, now it is coming back in al kind of backdoors.

Now , if you have read my other thread that nothing, technologywise came out of 'Modern Academic Science".
might makes more sense. Because all the real technological inventions made use of the Aether.
So, new inventions made by "Modern Academic Science"'after 1929-1930 were not possible.


Why is the "Modern Academic Science" so keen on surpressing the idea of an Aether?
 
I’m still trying to find “Laurel Canyon.”

What is an “aether?”


I can’t believe I asked..........
 
Palandro said:
Thanks to the ridiculous and extremely stupid and therefore wrong theories of the plagiarist called ein-stein ( meaning just one half of a brain ;) ), the aether was abandoned.
However, now it is coming back in al kind of backdoors.

Now , if you have read my other thread that nothing, technologywise came out of 'Modern Academic Science".
might makes more sense. Because all the real technological inventions made use of the Aether.
So, new inventions made by "Modern Academic Science"'after 1929-1930 were not possible.


Why is the "Modern Academic Science" so keen on surpressing the idea of an Aether?
Click to expand...



Science can't explain how bumblebees manage to fly.

Answer: aether
 
Palandro said:
Thanks to the ridiculous and extremely stupid and therefore wrong theories of the plagiarist called ein-stein ( meaning just one half of a brain ;) ), the aether was abandoned.
However, now it is coming back in al kind of backdoors.

Now , if you have read my other thread that nothing, technologywise came out of 'Modern Academic Science".
might makes more sense. Because all the real technological inventions made use of the Aether.
So, new inventions made by "Modern Academic Science"'after 1929-1930 were not possible.


Why is the "Modern Academic Science" so keen on surpressing the idea of an Aether?
Click to expand...

Name some of these inventions and explain why they use the aether. Also look up Michelson and Morely.
 
zyzygy said:
Name some of these inventions and explain why they use the aether. Also look up Michelson and Morely.
Click to expand...

Of course I am aware of the works of Michelson and Morely, I am sure you have researched very little more , then what is in the standard Bible ehhh sorry Textbooks of the religion called "Modern Academic Science".
 
Last edited:
zyzygy said:
Name some of these inventions and explain why they use the aether. Also look up Michelson and Morely.
Click to expand...

Look up Nikola Tesla, an intellectual genius compared with the village idiot called ein-stein

How many patents does Tesla have? And the very dumb ein-stein?
 
Palandro said:
Look up Nikola Tesla, an intellectual genius compared with the village idiot called ein-stein

How many patents does Tesla have? And the very dumb ein-stein?
Click to expand...

You are funny. Explain the result of the Michelson Morely experiment.
 
zyzygy said:
. Explain the result of the Michelson Morely experiment.
Click to expand...

Well, While would I? and I say that because there is not only just one result of the Michelson Morely experiment.
It isn't as they teach in the indoctrination camps oeps sorry , education camps.

Please don't tell me you are a "scientist"? They can't think by default.

And btw checked the patens by Tesla yet? I know, I know...
 
Palandro said:
Thanks to the ridiculous and extremely stupid and therefore wrong theories of the plagiarist called ein-stein ( meaning just one half of a brain ;) ), the aether was abandoned.
However, now it is coming back in al kind of backdoors.

Now , if you have read my other thread that nothing, technologywise came out of 'Modern Academic Science".
might makes more sense. Because all the real technological inventions made use of the Aether.
So, new inventions made by "Modern Academic Science"'after 1929-1930 were not possible.


Why is the "Modern Academic Science" so keen on surpressing the idea of an Aether?
Click to expand...


Why is the "Modern Academic Science" (whatever that is supposed to be) so keen on suppressing "bleeding" as a cure for the vapors? And vibrators as a cure for female hysteria (although I have been known to drive a woman to hysteria with one)
 
Palandro said:
Well, While would I? and I say that because there is not only just one result of the Michelson Morely experiment.
It isn't as they teach in the indoctrination camps oeps sorry , education camps.

Please don't tell me you are a "scientist"? They can't think by default.

And btw checked the patens by Tesla yet? I know, I know...
Click to expand...

I am familiar with the work of Tesla. I can recommend this book.

9780691165615.jpg
 
Palandro said:
Thanks to the ridiculous and extremely stupid and therefore wrong theories of the plagiarist called ein-stein ( meaning just one half of a brain ;) ), the aether was abandoned.
However, now it is coming back in al kind of backdoors.

Now , if you have read my other thread that nothing, technologywise came out of 'Modern Academic Science".
might makes more sense. Because all the real technological inventions made use of the Aether.
So, new inventions made by "Modern Academic Science"'after 1929-1930 were not possible.


Why is the "Modern Academic Science" so keen on surpressing the idea of an Aether?
Click to expand...

Your German is as weak as your science. "Ein Stein" means "one stone."
 
Jack Hays said:
You don't get the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...

well, fortunately that is not up to you.

(Because you have no clue where I am coming from, makes your postings extra funny, thank you!)


lol
 
We are still waiting to hear about why Einstein was wrong.
 
Palandro said:
Why is the "Modern Academic Science" so keen on surpressing the idea of an Aether?
Click to expand...
The only possible reasonable explanation for why
the secret masters of "Modern Academic Science" all work together with their minions to suppress the TRUTH of the æther,
is because the æther is actually the embodiment of THE HOLY GHOST!

"Modern Academic Science" is set against us finding "at-one-ment" w/ THE HOLY GHOST!


No other possible explanation — no matter how contrived — is both reasonable and makes sense.



/s
 
Simon W. Moon said:
The only possible reasonable explanation for why
the secret masters of "Modern Academic Science" all work together with their minions to suppress the TRUTH of the æther,
is because the æther is actually the embodiment of THE HOLY GHOST!

"Modern Academic Science" is set against us finding "at-one-ment" w/ THE HOLY GHOST!


No other possible explanation — no matter how contrived — is both reasonable and makes sense.



/s
Click to expand...

Hush!!!! You have said too much. Code Red.
 
Palandro said:
Thanks to the ridiculous and extremely stupid and therefore wrong theories of the plagiarist called ein-stein ( meaning just one half of a brain ;) ), the aether was abandoned.
However, now it is coming back in al kind of backdoors.

Now , if you have read my other thread that nothing, technologywise came out of 'Modern Academic Science".
might makes more sense. Because all the real technological inventions made use of the Aether.
So, new inventions made by "Modern Academic Science"'after 1929-1930 were not possible.


Why is the "Modern Academic Science" so keen on surpressing the idea of an Aether?
Click to expand...

Why do you hate science?
 
Palandro has abandoned yet another thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom