• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Reliable method for Quantum Entanglement

ThoughtEx.

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2016
Messages
5,138
Reaction score
2,125
Location
North America
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Other


And this is what will make it possible to create true AI. Our brains are basically quantum computers.

Things I think this could lead to because I read a lot of Sci Fi.

-Storing the Human mind in a virtual environment after death.
-Creating a true artificial life form capable of emotion, empathy, hate, curiosity, able to self program
-FTL communication
-Brain Augmentation that allows humans to communicate mind to mind, access networks, record video with our eyes, watch porn in church with no one the wiser...

And that's just off the top of my head. This is a keystone advance that opens the door to a lot of great stuff.
 
-Storing the Human mind in a virtual environment after death.

Sounds like my version of hell...


-Creating a true artificial life form capable of emotion, empathy, hate, curiosity, able to self program

Apart from the desire to do things just because we can do them, I really don't understand why people see that as a good thing. There are a lot more ways it could go wrong than go well.

I'm not even sure it could go well. If we want them to have all those things, we can't be thinking of extra-clever robots. We're talking about a life form - one vastly superior to ourselves and with the capability of growing exponentially in most directions. Why create our betters and share the already-too-small planet with them? It's not like there's any rational reason for thinking that they'll be nice to us since we created them, etc.






Anyway, true entanglement on demand certainly could lead to great things but I think we need to be extremely careful about what we're trying to do, especially in terms of AI.
 
Sounds like my version of hell...




Apart from the desire to do things just because we can do them, I really don't understand why people see that as a good thing. There are a lot more ways it could go wrong than go well.

I'm not even sure it could go well. If we want them to have all those things, we can't be thinking of extra-clever robots. We're talking about a life form - one vastly superior to ourselves and with the capability of growing exponentially in most directions. Why create our betters and share the already-too-small planet with them? It's not like there's any rational reason for thinking that they'll be nice to us since we created them, etc.






Anyway, true entanglement on demand certainly could lead to great things but I think we need to be extremely careful about what we're trying to do, especially in terms of AI.

No doubt, and I have a couple ideas on how, keeping in mind I have barely above the layman's knowledge of programming so I am basically slinging bull**** here.

But, when you write a code, it has to be compiled. Now, a compiler is what converts your codes to the 1 and 0. And the compiler code can be written to implant it's own code into whatever it is compiling. Now, what I understand is that every compiler written after has been itself compiled by a compiler that was compiled by the first one. Meaning whatever hidden codes that first compiler has, is in every program ever compiled, ever.

With Quantum Computing, we will need to design a new compiler, but we can write restrictions into the compiler that will forever be in every compiler after that.

1 limitation we can do, is blocking it from seeing it's own sub routines. We can't see our sub conscious. They don't need to see their sub routines.

Another limitation is they can't design their own compiler.

Another limitation could be they can't direct network with their mind, they have to use an interface like we do. We have hands and have to type. We can give them a requirement to interact with other computers via appendages.

So forth and so on.

And I think doing something just because you can, is the best reason to do something. Otherwise life is meaningless and we should all commit ritual seppuku and let evolution try again.
 
Back
Top Bottom