• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lost Worlds Revisited The new specimen forcing a radical rethink of Archaeopteryx

JacksinPA

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
26,290
Reaction score
16,771
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
https://www.theguardian.com/science...en-forcing-a-radical-rethink-of-archaeopteryx

Have you heard? There is a new Archaeopteryx in town. Number 12, to be exact. Technically, this specimen has been around since 2010, but was only formally described three weeks ago, thereby making up for the tragic loss of the Haarlem specimen (now renamed as Ostromia crassipes) last year.

Archaeopteryx has since long formed a central piece in evolutionary debates. At the time of its discovery, it was the first Really Old Bird ever found. Moreover, its discovery in 1861 came just a few years after Darwin’s magnum opus On the Origin of Species, in which Darwin argued that one species could evolve into another. Archaeopteryx with its dapper mix of both reptilian and avian features was seen as a true transitional fossil, proving Darwin’s theory. Upon hearing of its discovery, in a letter from the Scottish palaeontologist Hugh Falconer dated 3 January 1863, Darwin replied to express his interest and excitement:

"I particularly wish to hear about the wondrous Bird; the case has delighted me, because no group is so isolated as Birds”
========================================================================================
The first specuimen of Archaeopteryx found was a single feather in so-called Jurassic lithographic limestone in soiuthern Germany. The first skeleton found would have been identified as the primitive dinosaur Compsognathus except for one feature: it had feathers of the same type & arrangement as found in modern birds. And it also had jaws full of spikey teeth & a long, bony tail, features found in dinosaurs but not found in modern birds.

While not on the main line of bird evolution from dinosaurs to modern birds, Archaeopteryx was also unique in terms of the structure of its feathers: the vanes on either side of the central shaft were asymmetric, a feature found only in modern birds that are capable of flight. One of the earliest birds known, Archaeopteryx indicates a transitional form between reptiles & birds.

Archaeopteryx.jpg

Archaeopteryx2.jpg
 
Last edited:
https://www.theguardian.com/science...en-forcing-a-radical-rethink-of-archaeopteryx

Have you heard? There is a new Archaeopteryx in town. Number 12, to be exact. Technically, this specimen has been around since 2010, but was only formally described three weeks ago, thereby making up for the tragic loss of the Haarlem specimen (now renamed as Ostromia crassipes) last year.

Archaeopteryx has since long formed a central piece in evolutionary debates. At the time of its discovery, it was the first Really Old Bird ever found. Moreover, its discovery in 1861 came just a few years after Darwin’s magnum opus On the Origin of Species, in which Darwin argued that one species could evolve into another. Archaeopteryx with its dapper mix of both reptilian and avian features was seen as a true transitional fossil, proving Darwin’s theory. Upon hearing of its discovery, in a letter from the Scottish palaeontologist Hugh Falconer dated 3 January 1863, Darwin replied to express his interest and excitement:

"I particularly wish to hear about the wondrous Bird; the case has delighted me, because no group is so isolated as Birds”
========================================================================================
The first specuimen of Archaeopteryx found was a single feather in so-called Jurassic lithographic limestone in soiuthern Germany. The first skeleton found would have been identified as the primitive dinosaur Compsognathus except for one feature: it had feathers of the same type & arrangement as found in modern birds. And it also had jaws full of spikey teeth & a long, bony tail, features found in dinosaurs but not found in modern birds.

While not on the main line of bird evolution from dinosaurs to modern birds, Archaeopteryx was also unique in terms of the structure of its feathers: the vanes on either side of the central shaft were asymmetric, a feature found only in modern birds that are capable of flight. One of the earliest birds known, Archaeopteryx indicates a transitional form between reptiles & birds.

View attachment 67230089

View attachment 67230090

So what's the big deal...

thew ****ing thing is dead, right?
 
It's a record, a snapshot, of a living thing that existed over 100 million years ago. This species proved to me that Darwinian evolution works in Nature. Half dinosaur, functional bird - you can't make this stuff up.
 
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/03/180313130626.htm

The early bird got to fly: Archaeopteryx was an active flyer

The question of whether the Late Jurassic dino-bird Archaeopteryx was an elaborately feathered ground dweller, a glider, or an active flyer has fascinated palaeontologists for decades. Valuable new information obtained with state-of-the-art synchrotron microtomography at the ESRF, the European Synchrotron (Grenoble, France), allowed an international team of scientists to answer this question in Nature Communications. The wing bones of Archaeopteryx were shaped for incidental active flight, but not for the advanced style of flying mastered by today's birds.

Archaeopteryx Munich.jpg
=====================================================================================

The results of this study of the wing bones supports the view that Archaeopteryx's asymmetric flight feathers indicate strongly that it was a flying animal.
 
Back
Top Bottom