• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DANGEROUS: Male-To-Female Transgender Breastfeeds Baby Using FDA-Banned Drug To Cause Lactation

WCH

WCH

Believer
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
31,009
Reaction score
9,029
Location
The Lone Star State.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
The Left is praising the use of domperidone on a male-to-female transgender individual who was given the U.S.-banned drug to induce lactation and exclusively breastfeed his child.

"It's a dream come true," boasts Bustle's Romper.

"Thanks to the work on induced lactation in Transgender women by Dr. Tamar Reisman and nurse practitioner and program manager Zil Goldstein at the Mt. Sinai Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery, a Transgender mother was not only able to breastfeed her child, but to be the baby’s exclusive food source for its first six weeks of life," reports Romper.
Snip...

https://www.dailywire.com/news/2703...&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=dwbrand

With the addition of all hormones pumped into this 'woman' and subsequently into the baby, no telling what they have done to this child.
 
Not dangerous at all, looks pretty safe, and this is not the only way trans-women have been able to breastfeed. Just one way. Trans women have breastfeed their kids for a while. They do have breasts, so it should be no surprise.
 
Anytime someone disparages an entire political philosophy for doing something collectively, such as "The left is praising..." The rest of the statement can be summarily dismissed as blind, partisan rhetoric which seeks to simplify and reduce deeply nuanced political views in to easily ignored stereotypes.

This is a typical method of distributing thought control.

What the OP seeks is to shame and chastise people into cultural conformity to their personally held viewpoint.

This is typical of the cultural marxism you see from bigots and hate peddlers. Like good commissars they are, this type of drivel is distributed by people who fear change and challenges to tradition, as it tends to erode their perspective of privilege and superiority in society.

If you don't want to be a trans person, don't be.
But if you don't want another person to be trans, and you seek to make that wish reality, you are a cultural marxist who seeks to force conformity. If you seek changes to law to prevent people from living their lives by their choices, which do not impact you in the least, you are simply an authoritarian who does not value liberty, and your opinion can be dismissed as such.

It is one thing to suggest that trans people should not utilize medication which might be dubious. It's another to cast a general condemnation on a broad and complex philosophical tradition, simply because you think something in the world is icky.

If we actually want to make this world a better place, we need to practice a level of intellectual maturity beyond what is demonstrated in the OP's post.
 
Last edited:
BreadConqueror said:
Anytime someone disparages an entire political philosophy for doing something collectively, such as "The left is praising..." The rest of the statement can be summarily dismissed as blind, partisan rhetoric which seeks to simplify and reduce deeply nuanced political views in to easily ignored stereotypes.

This is a typical method of distributing thought control.

What the OP seeks is to shame and chastise people into cultural conformity to their personally held viewpoint.

This is typical of the cultural marxism you see from bigots and hate peddlers. Like good commissars they are, this type of drivel is distributed by people who fear change and challenges to tradition, as it tends to erode their perspective of privilege and superiority in society.

If you don't want to be a trans person, don't be.
But if you don't want another person to be trans, and you seek to make that wish reality, you are a cultural marxist who seeks to force conformity. If you seek changes to law to prevent people from living their lives by their choices, which do not impact you in the least, you are simply an authoritarian who does not value liberty, and your opinion can be dismissed as such.

It is one thing to suggest that trans people should not utilize medication which might be dubious. It's another to cast a general condemnation on a broad and complex philosophical tradition, simply because you think something in the world is icky.

If we actually want to make this world a better place, we need to practice a level of intellectual maturity beyond what is demonstrated in the OP's post.
Click to expand...

Let's disregard the child's well being like most leftists do. You do what you want to yourself but, leave experimenting on other people's children out.
 
Your Star said:
Not dangerous at all, looks pretty safe, and this is not the only way trans-women have been able to breastfeed. Just one way. Trans women have breastfeed their kids for a while. They do have breasts, so it should be no surprise.
Click to expand...

First of all, this child was adopted. Secondly, she was using a banned drug to experiment on this child.

What if the kid had died or become sick in the future? Still think it's OK?
 
I tend to look askance at conservative claims to concern about the welfare of a child. Outside of the womb, anyway.
 
WCH said:
Let's disregard the child's well being like most leftists do. You do what you want to yourself but, leave experimenting on other people's children out.
Click to expand...

We're not talking about other people's children, goober. We're talking about this individual's children.

You're literally advocating for exerting control over another woman's children.
 
WCH said:
The Left is praising the use of domperidone on a male-to-female transgender individual who was given the U.S.-banned drug to induce lactation and exclusively breastfeed his child.

"It's a dream come true," boasts Bustle's Romper.

"Thanks to the work on induced lactation in Transgender women by Dr. Tamar Reisman and nurse practitioner and program manager Zil Goldstein at the Mt. Sinai Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery, a Transgender mother was not only able to breastfeed her child, but to be the baby’s exclusive food source for its first six weeks of life," reports Romper.
Snip...

https://www.dailywire.com/news/2703...&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=dwbrand

With the addition of all hormones pumped into this 'woman' and subsequently into the baby, no telling what they have done to this child.
Click to expand...

LMAO . . the daily wire

Ill wait for LEGIT medical science community members inut on this because I have a topically fake and uneducated meltdown like your op does.

heres something another article where they simply mentioned the milk has to be tested and this is not recommended yet but its a huge break through. I do admit im not familiar with this site either it was just the first that came up when i added science to the search.

https://www.newscientist.com/articl...n-is-first-to-be-able-to-breastfeed-her-baby/

"IF" there is any evidence and factual proof this shouldn't be done by the majority of the medical community, of course ill condemn it, if they support it then im completely fine with it. :)
 
BreadConqueror said:
We're not talking about other people's children, goober. We're talking about this individual's children.

You're literally advocating for exerting control over another woman's children.
Click to expand...

The child was adopted. But you don't really care.
 
WCH said:
The Left is praising the use of domperidone on a male-to-female transgender individual who was given the U.S.-banned drug to induce lactation and exclusively breastfeed his child.

"It's a dream come true," boasts Bustle's Romper.

"Thanks to the work on induced lactation in Transgender women by Dr. Tamar Reisman and nurse practitioner and program manager Zil Goldstein at the Mt. Sinai Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery, a Transgender mother was not only able to breastfeed her child, but to be the baby’s exclusive food source for its first six weeks of life," reports Romper.
Snip...

https://www.dailywire.com/news/2703...&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=dwbrand

With the addition of all hormones pumped into this 'woman' and subsequently into the baby, no telling what they have done to this child.
Click to expand...

Yeah, screw the kid who might have problems because of being exposed to a banned drug. Who cares, as long as she gets to feel good. It's terrible.
 
Your Star said:
Not dangerous at all, looks pretty safe, and this is not the only way trans-women have been able to breastfeed. Just one way. Trans women have breastfeed their kids for a while. They do have breasts, so it should be no surprise.
Click to expand...

If it's pretty safe, why is it banned?
 
WCH said:
The child was adopted. But you don't really care.
Click to expand...

And hence became that person's child. Not yours. Not the parent that gave them up.

Do you understand how adoption works?
 
BreadConqueror said:
And hence became that person's child. Not yours. Not the parent that gave them up.

Do you understand how adoption works?
Click to expand...

IMO, using banned/experimental drugs while nursing that child is abuse. Just as it would be while using heroin or meth.
 
WCH said:
Not for that use.

Again I don't care what you do to yourself..just leave babies out of it.
Click to expand...

And I don't care what you do to yourself. Leave MY and OTHER PEOPLE'S babies out of it.

You're being an incredible hypocrite.

I could present a study that shows introducing children to religion at an early age is bad for them.

I could then use your own argument to suggest religious parents should be legally required not to send their kids to church.

Your argument is the dismissal of personal liberty.

Authoritarian fascism has no place in America.
 
WCH said:
The Left is praising the use of domperidone on a male-to-female transgender individual who was given the U.S.-banned drug to induce lactation and exclusively breastfeed his child.

"It's a dream come true," boasts Bustle's Romper.

"Thanks to the work on induced lactation in Transgender women by Dr. Tamar Reisman and nurse practitioner and program manager Zil Goldstein at the Mt. Sinai Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery, a Transgender mother was not only able to breastfeed her child, but to be the baby’s exclusive food source for its first six weeks of life," reports Romper.
Snip...

https://www.dailywire.com/news/2703...&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=dwbrand

With the addition of all hormones pumped into this 'woman' and subsequently into the baby, no telling what they have done to this child.
Click to expand...

Who is Mr. Left and why would his parents name him "The"?





People aren't fungible....
 
WCH said:
Not for that use.

Again I don't care what you do to yourself..just leave babies out of it.
Click to expand...

Can you show me medical evidence of any sort of harm?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom