- Joined
- Aug 15, 2017
- Messages
- 17,278
- Reaction score
- 17,062
- Location
- In a box.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Several issues come to mind;
1. Maintenance.....the service life of those multiple modules have an expiration date for a reason....eventually they become too worn and dangerous to operate; space is a very harsh environment, and you cant just pull the ISS into a Jiffy lube for a few repairs.
2. Profitability....what corporation is going to want to pour about 3 Billion per year into its operation, resupply, ground support and upkeep without seeing a return on investment?
3. Even with significant depreciation, the cost to build the ISS exceeded 100 Billion....slashing the price by 50% will still leave you with a 50 Billion price tag....how may tech companies will pony up that much money for a system that is nearly 20 years old?
1. Maintenance.....the service life of those multiple modules have an expiration date for a reason....eventually they become too worn and dangerous to operate; space is a very harsh environment, and you cant just pull the ISS into a Jiffy lube for a few repairs.
2. Profitability....what corporation is going to want to pour about 3 Billion per year into its operation, resupply, ground support and upkeep without seeing a return on investment?
3. Even with significant depreciation, the cost to build the ISS exceeded 100 Billion....slashing the price by 50% will still leave you with a 50 Billion price tag....how may tech companies will pony up that much money for a system that is nearly 20 years old?