• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NASA's amibitious plan to save the Earth from a Super volcano

Lord of Planar said:
Luke...

The confirmation bias is string in this one...
Click to expand...

If it isn't confirmation bias, you would be able to find the information, online, from a source that isn't a blog or a psueoscience site. You can't even do that, so it appears to me that it is . well you that has the credibility issue.

I just asked you to support your claim. You are not able to.
 
RAMOSS said:
If it isn't confirmation bias, you would be able to find the information, online, from a source that isn't a blog or a psueoscience site. You can't even do that, so it appears to me that it is . well you that has the credibility issue.

I just asked you to support your claim. You are not able to.
Click to expand...

I did take a quick look at the IPCC web site, but all they have for dates are the corrected dates. The FAR for example doesn't show it's original published date, and has a 1992 supplement. Some of the AR4 material was revised again in 2013. I didn't see any links to the original published dates, but it is fact that they published the either WG2 or WG3 before WG1 was finalized on either the SAR, or AR4. I forget which one. This is a long time ago. And yes, I read them those years back when they were published. Did you?

I'm not going to dig any deeper. I don't care if you take my word or not. I am comfortable with my integrity vs. those of you who regurgitate what the pundits say. I have a strong science background, worked several years in engineering, thou unrelated. I understand the peer review papers I read from the several journals I subscribe to.

This isn't worth arguing over anyway. Just look at most of your fellow warmers. Look at what evidence they don't provide.
 
Lord of Planar said:
I did take a quick look at the IPCC web site, but all they have for dates are the corrected dates. The FAR for example doesn't show it's original published date, and has a 1992 supplement. Some of the AR4 material was revised again in 2013. I didn't see any links to the original published dates, but it is fact that they published the either WG2 or WG3 before WG1 was finalized on either the SAR, or AR4. I forget which one. This is a long time ago. And yes, I read them those years back when they were published. Did you?

I'm not going to dig any deeper. I don't care if you take my word or not. I am comfortable with my integrity vs. those of you who regurgitate what the pundits say. I have a strong science background, worked several years in engineering, thou unrelated. I understand the peer review papers I read from the several journals I subscribe to.

This isn't worth arguing over anyway. Just look at most of your fellow warmers. Look at what evidence they don't provide.
Click to expand...

That isn't what I asked for. I asked for you to support your claim that the earth is more geologically stable from when the last super volcano erupted. What does climate change have to do with geological stability and your claim (that you won't support)
 
RAMOSS said:
That isn't what I asked for. I asked for you to support your claim that the earth is more geologically stable from when the last super volcano erupted. What does climate change have to do with geological stability and your claim (that you won't support)
Click to expand...

I'm sorry.

I lose track of who I argue what with sometimes.

Are you suggesting that volcanic activity does not decrease as the earth gets older?
 
Lord of Planar said:
I'm sorry.

I lose track of who I argue what with sometimes.

Are you suggesting that volcanic activity does not decrease as the earth gets older?
Click to expand...

I am asking you to support the claim that the stability of the earth geologically has happened since the last time there was a super volcano, so that it can't happen again, which was your claim.
 
RAMOSS said:
I am asking you to support the claim that the stability of the earth geologically has happened since the last time there was a super volcano, so that it can't happen again, which was your claim.
Click to expand...

Yes, I get it.

I wish Alta Vista was still around. Google just keeps giving everything but what I look for.

Believe as you wish. It would take too much effort to find what I know existed in the past.
 
Lord of Planar said:
Yes, I get it.

I wish Alta Vista was still around. Google just keeps giving everything but what I look for.

Believe as you wish. It would take too much effort to find what I know existed in the past.
Click to expand...

I suspect that you are remembering something that was speculation, or non-scientific.
 
RAMOSS said:
I suspect that you are remembering something that was speculation, or non-scientific.
Click to expand...

I don't care what you believe.

If you want, take it as a win. The intranet if too commercialized with loaded searches to find proper information any more.

I can't even find the naked picture of me any more.
 
Lord of Planar said:
I don't care what you believe.

If you want, take it as a win. The intranet if too commercialized with loaded searches to find proper information any more.

I can't even find the naked picture of me any more.
Click to expand...

Well, it doesn't matter what I believe or don't believe. What matters is you make claims, and you can't back it up with legit sources. That is all that matters.

I personally believe people exhibit patterns. This is a data point in a pattern.
 
RAMOSS said:
Well, it doesn't matter what I believe or don't believe. What matters is you make claims, and you can't back it up with legit sources. That is all that matters.

I personally believe people exhibit patterns. This is a data point in a pattern.
Click to expand...

Believe as you wish, but keep in mind, some of us are outliers from statistical.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom