Well, I expect that the government would look at all the options they have available to those who break the law. If it were required by law to have vaccines, and remember, I've also said elsewhere in this thread that if they were to do this, they would need to come up with a way to screen for people who would experience some kind of sensitivity - an allergic reaction, for example - and exempt them based on medical reasons, and someone chose to break that law, I expect it would be the same as anyone else who would break the law.
See above, where I advocate for medical testing to ensure that folks taking it would be able to do so safely. You don't need 100% vaccination to assure "herd immunity", so anyone truly at risk could be exempted. But it should be for a real reason....people just saying "Uh, I read in some click bait article that vaccines give you aww-tizm, so **** my kid's safety and **** your kid's safety, they ain't gettin' them, I know better than 99% of the medical community" doesn't cut it for me.
