• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Climate change re-visited

wolfman24

Demented Lycanthropist
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 17, 2012
Messages
5,058
Reaction score
1,402
Location
East Waboo USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Hi

In the 1980's Reagan said that the environmental cleanup industry will fail and if it didn't it will never make any money. Today the environmental cleanup industry (minus lawyers and government) is a multi-billion dollar industry in the US alone. (personal knowledge). What happened? Corporate America realized that there was money in them thar hills.

Like most new things (planes, TV, environmental cleanup, etc) the narrow minded and myoptic people refuse to accept that there is anything in the new ideas or businesses and time after time they are proven wrong.

For a long time the Pro climate change people have been quoting studies, saying how many scientists believe in climate change or giving presentations using facts and figures to prove their point (Al Gore for example).

All they have managed to do is put a lot of people to sleep, especially those who can make a difference.

A few years ago a new kind of documentary came out using a whole new approach. It was called Carbon Nation. It is still relatively unknown, WHY? lots of reasons mostly the environmental lobby failed to see the wisdom of the message.

There is gold in them thar hills.

Showing by clear example and financial means that the alternative energy industry has a profit making ability will keep the attention of those people who like when the airplane or TV were know have the brains, foresight and guts to invest interest.

Showing how in the last 10 years the growth of alternative energy has added to the bottom line and will continue to do so is a better way than shoving facts and figures in the faces of people who don't know what they mean or care.

The biggest moronic argument against alternative energy has been its not effective or doesn't work. BULL. Obviously these people don't live in California, Iowa, Illinois, Wisconsin, Texas and the other 23 States that have money making enterprises supplying cheap, clean energy to the people in their states. Its also the same argument they used for TV.

So those who are in the fight you need to switch gears and talk to the movers and shakers in a language they understand. Otherwise you are just beating your head against a wall. Even Donald Trump with his limited intelligence could figure out a profit if you could get inside his bubble.


Wolf
 
Hi

In the 1980's Reagan said that the environmental cleanup industry will fail and if it didn't it will never make any money. Today the environmental cleanup industry (minus lawyers and government) is a multi-billion dollar industry in the US alone. (personal knowledge). What happened? Corporate America realized that there was money in them thar hills.

Like most new things (planes, TV, environmental cleanup, etc) the narrow minded and myoptic people refuse to accept that there is anything in the new ideas or businesses and time after time they are proven wrong.

For a long time the Pro climate change people have been quoting studies, saying how many scientists believe in climate change or giving presentations using facts and figures to prove their point (Al Gore for example).

All they have managed to do is put a lot of people to sleep, especially those who can make a difference.

A few years ago a new kind of documentary came out using a whole new approach. It was called Carbon Nation. It is still relatively unknown, WHY? lots of reasons mostly the environmental lobby failed to see the wisdom of the message.

There is gold in them thar hills.

Showing by clear example and financial means that the alternative energy industry has a profit making ability will keep the attention of those people who like when the airplane or TV were know have the brains, foresight and guts to invest interest.

Showing how in the last 10 years the growth of alternative energy has added to the bottom line and will continue to do so is a better way than shoving facts and figures in the faces of people who don't know what they mean or care.

The biggest moronic argument against alternative energy has been its not effective or doesn't work. BULL. Obviously these people don't live in California, Iowa, Illinois, Wisconsin, Texas and the other 23 States that have money making enterprises supplying cheap, clean energy to the people in their states. Its also the same argument they used for TV.

So those who are in the fight you need to switch gears and talk to the movers and shakers in a language they understand. Otherwise you are just beating your head against a wall. Even Donald Trump with his limited intelligence could figure out a profit if you could get inside his bubble.


Wolf

What is new about external effects? What are yiu trying to imply?
 
How much of this is tax payer dollors paying for these cleanups?

The corporations are profiting, but the tax payers?
 
How much of this is tax payer dollors paying for these cleanups?

The corporations are profiting, but the tax payers?

Basically all of it. Unless you're looking at buying a piece of land, or something adjacent to it, what business interest is there for you to clean it up?

So, the taxpayers pay corporations to clean up messes. Sometimes a mess that the same company created in the first place. (COUGH BOEING COUGH)

Of course, us heathen liberals wanted to prevent that mess in the first place but KILLN R JERRRBS
 
Problem is, liberals like you don't know what a fair balance is.
 
Back
Top Bottom