• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

M theory.

You said mass generates electromagnetism. The quote says interaction of electric fields does that.

If gravity is electromagnetism, the high charge magnet should have more gravity than the low charge rock. However, he reverse is true: the low charge rock has more gravity than the high charge magnet,

I originally said protons generate magnetism, and electrons provide the electric side of things. these are particles.

Do you believe there is a "graviton?"
 
I originally said protons generate magnetism, and electrons provide the electric side of things. these are particles.

Do you believe there is a "graviton?"

Which doesnt address the rock vs magnet problem. Why does the rock have more gravity but no magnetic field
 
Which doesnt address the rock vs magnet problem. Why does the rock have more gravity but no magnetic field

Because the magnet has a charge it exerts more magnetism. the rock has more mass and a magnetic field.

Have you ever watched leaves on a lake - they gravitate towards each other.
 
Because the magnet has a charge it exerts more magnetism. the rock has more mass and a magnetic field.

Have you ever watched leaves on a lake - they gravitate towards each other.

Google "surface tension".
 
Back
Top Bottom