• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New Model of Poverty by Satellite Imaging

Celebrity

DP Veteran
Joined
May 13, 2016
Messages
5,257
Reaction score
761
Location
VT, USA
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
How ethical is this new technology? Researchers used a predictive model across two sets of data to come up with accurate statistics for average spending and average household wealth.

Similar to this technology is a machine learning algorithm for connecting people in India who lack electricity.

The final computer model was “strongly predictive” of two important measures of poverty – average spending by households and average household wealth. In Rwanda, for instance, the model predicted average household wealth more accurately than data from cellphone records, according to the study. (Another problem with cellphone records: They’re proprietary, and companies aren’t always willing to share them.

Here is the Stanford study for nerds: http://cs229.stanford.edu/proj2015/162_report.pdf
 
What do you think might be unethical?

The surveillance state is an ethical dilemma. On one hand, is it an invasion of privacy or does it provide robust statistics for use in the public domain? On the other hand, should the state even be in the picture when information about our private lives is being capitalized upon in the private sector?

Caveat emptor: if you mess up the grid, not only will you fail to adequately provide a service such as a utility, but you will be remembered alongside other environmental polluters like Gazprom, Shell, or even the government of Ukraine (owners of the Chernobyl plant). I'm sure networks designed to match these models will have fault tolerance as a priority, but the implementation in society comes with a risk. If you know how much money some community has, can that data be bought and sold? How will that affect trade?
 
The surveillance state is an ethical dilemma. On one hand, is it an invasion of privacy or does it provide robust statistics for use in the public domain? On the other hand, should the state even be in the picture when information about our private lives is being capitalized upon in the private sector?

Caveat emptor: if you mess up the grid, not only will you fail to adequately provide a service such as a utility, but you will be remembered alongside other environmental polluters like Gazprom, Shell, or even the government of Ukraine (owners of the Chernobyl plant). I'm sure networks designed to match these models will have fault tolerance as a priority, but the implementation in society comes with a risk. If you know how much money some community has, can that data be bought and sold? How will that affect trade?

I am not really sure of the answers to you questions. But I do not see this as a topic concerning "ethics", but as one of efficiency of a society. Can the society adopt a higher technology to raise its capabilities for planing, allocating tax money to the best use and solve social problems like crime without putting itself in danger of collapsing into dictatorship or uncontrolled majority rule? If it cannot, it is by definition falling behind its efficiency-optimum frontier. So how do you adopt the new technology without losing your freedom?
 
I am not really sure of the answers to you questions. But I do not see this as a topic concerning "ethics", but as one of efficiency of a society. Can the society adopt a higher technology to raise its capabilities for planing, allocating tax money to the best use and solve social problems like crime without putting itself in danger of collapsing into dictatorship or uncontrolled majority rule? If it cannot, it is by definition falling behind its efficiency-optimum frontier. So how do you adopt the new technology without losing your freedom?

Yes, the use of this data will most likely be bundled with census data as useful demographic information. There will likely not be laws put in place to regulate the use of this new technology, until there is sufficient public outcry. The same thing happened with drones, the technology was developed first and the rules specific to drone technology came later. Of course, there may have been some background for UAS, but the scale of regulation is still being developed in municipal government.
 
Back
Top Bottom