With chemistry, i am trying to figure out a 'bonding rule of thumb.' each atom that bonds has a certain weight not related to anything except the weight of the material, even though the further you go down the table, there are more protons, the weight does not reflect anything about the make up of the molecule or atoms.
So, instead of trying once more to find a pattern between the elements - maybe metals have a different ratio of proton to weight than gases? - then we need to find the right way to depict the molecule somehow, maybe by taking each atom that is in it and finding out if the sum of the atoms is directly related to the weight and density of the molecule?
For example, water behaves similarly to 'liquid metals,' and water is much lighter than liquid metals in a smelter. due to the weight of the liquid metals, even though they behave in the same manner, they will also have the chemical make up as the metal they are from. this means there is a whole world out there to explore when it comes to liquids and so forth, especially as nitrogen, for example, is a gas that cannot melt.
That said, i think there might be a pattern between all elements coming together to form molecules and the weights, among other things, but cannot get around to doing this as it is frustratingly long to do properly with so many different classes of matter and weights having no real pattern between them.
~ I suspect that it has something to do with magical elements, being fire, water, air and earth. this is because all the elements come from these, if you were to observe that [1] hydrogen is liquid, [2] helium is gas, [3] Lithium is earth and [4] baryon is fire, yes? maybe this guideline or rule of thumb will help unravel a periodic table number or proton number, as they have the same numbers, to weight ratios?