- Joined
- Sep 13, 2014
- Messages
- 19,612
- Reaction score
- 7,713
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
I'm not participating in this election.
I see. So how exactly does that place you in a position to judge others who are?
I'm not participating in this election.
I recall we're to resist it. which is impossible apart from the Spirit. However, I don't recall being instructed to take up arms, unless you intend to slay ISIS with the sword of the Spirit. I also don't recall being instructed to legislate God's law and impose it upon non-believers.
I see. So how exactly does that place you in a position to judge others who are?
I just laid out for you the scriptural justification for it in Romans 13, etc.
I just laid out for you the scriptural justification for it in Romans 13, etc.
I'm sure an entire thread could be devoted to What is an Evangelical and Who is an Evangelical.
Further, I stated in the OP:
I suspect that some born again persons are evangelical, and that some evangelicals are born again. However, I don't assume they are synonymous.
The topic is not about Evangelicals, Catholics, Amalekites, or any other religious label or people group.
It is about the conduct and activities of those who are born again.
and well you would be incorrect.
I see nothing in Romans 13 in regards to taking up arms and killing people. I do see we are to be subject to and to submit to the authorities.
And wouldn't that mean, that if the gov't wanted to kill you for whatever reason, that you would surrender in Christ?
Therefore you won't complain when you pay increased taxes under Clinton, right???
The logic is unmistakable in Romans 13.
If the government is an "agent of wrath" against an evildoer, and the evildoer is, say, ISIS, you wouldn't think the gov't officials would be doing the actual fighting, would you? No. The military - made up of Christians, Jews, etc. - would. And that is Christians taking up the sword.
Self-defense - a Christian husband slaying a knife-wielding assailant attacking his wife - is another example. Love does not stand idly by and let a murderer slay one's family.
The logic
I do see we are to be subject to and to submit to the authorities.
And wouldn't that mean, that if the gov't wanted to kill you for whatever reason, that you would surrender in Christ?
Fill me in.
The logic is unmistakable in Romans 13. If the government is an "agent of wrath" against an evildoer, and the evildoer is, say, ISIS, you wouldn't think the gov't officials would be doing the actual fighting, would you? No. The military - made up of Christians, Jews, etc. - would. And that is Christians taking up the sword.
Self-defense - a Christian husband slaying a knife-wielding assailant attacking his wife - is another example. Love does not stand idly by and let a murderer slay one's family.
Plus, you never answered my question:
The Politics of the Evangelical Right, and Their Very Public Sin
I used this article as a backdrop for the topic of this thread:
Born Again Christians have No Business Being Involved in Law, Politics, or War
Believers were called to spread the good news of eternal life in Christ, not impose God's Law upon a lost world, entangle themselves in the politick and cares of this world, or kill others in conquest of treasures and trade routes for the rich. Do you really believe that Jesus would pick up a machine gun to fight for the stupid **** we're fighting for? Or lead a (R) party committee to draft legislation to make it unlawful to sin? WTF is wrong with you?
If the Gov't is "ISIS" Romans 13 tells us that ISIS has been established by God - That ISIS are God's servants doing his work - that these are God's servants for good and you are to submit to ISIS if you are one of their subjects. You are not to rebel against what God has instituted. .. you are to obey or be punished.
Why would one who is filled with and led by the Spirit depend upon logic to guide them in matters of taking a human life?
Blessed are the peacemakers; there will always be wars. We're not to be entangled with the cares of this world.
The lost will always kill each other. It comes naturally, since it's in the nature of sin.
If God is in fact in complete control, then the manner He chooses to bring you home is His choice and will. He can bring you home with cancer, a mack truck, or an intruder. It's not your life. remember?
Nazi's thought the same of jews, no?
If they came for you like they did Jesus, what can you do?
Who says the logic isn't Holy Spirit inspired?
"He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one." - Luke 22:36 The people need a literal sword for what reason?
"Blessed be the LORD, my rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle." - Psalm 144:1
So you're going to sit there on your rear end and watch criminals rape and murder your wife, and carve up your children? That's your idea of love?
You must protect yourself and your family 22 Important Bible Verses About Self Defense
16. Psalm 82:4 Rescue weak and needy people. Help them escape the power of wicked people.
17. Proverbs 24:11 Rescue captives condemned to death, and spare those staggering toward their slaughter.
18. 1 Timothy 5:8 But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.
Logic, by definition, isn't an instruction from God.
How many of the Apostles died in battle?
David was denied the privilege of building the Temple because of blood on his hands.
I certainly don't see that conclusion in the Bible. God gives wisdom, which can produce logic.
Doesn't matter. They were told to take up their swords. And again, for what reason??
So? Moses had blood on his hands too, and yet you can read about him on the Mount of Transfiguration with Jesus.
Sometimes God does raise up enemies against an immoral state or people, like what happened with Nebuchadnezzar sacking Jerusalem. Did you see that in the Bible?
Paul does not say "Sometimes". Paul is saying that every authority must be obeyed because it is from God.
Why is it so difficult for you to accept that not everything Paul said was inspired ? Paul was trying get Christianity off the Roman radar. Being on the Roman radar was not a good thing back in the day. This is completely understandable and a good move by Paul.
What Paul was really saying (IMO) was that Christians should not rebel against Roman authority. Unfortunately, what he writes refers to all authorities throughout all time.
This of course is absurd. Many evil regimes that came later used this doctrine for evil purposes.
You can believe that such a doctrine was "inspired by God" if you like. I just do not share your opinion. To me this would be to make God a bit of an idiot and I do not believe that God is an idiot.