- Joined
- Jun 6, 2014
- Messages
- 43,804
- Reaction score
- 8,671
- Location
- Flanders.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I think a lot of what you're saying has merit. Phenomena should first be separated from mundane causes and explanations. What I think is a tad bit flawed in extending this analysis too much is the notion that, because a lot of it can be ruled out, that all of it can be ruled out. This, at best, is a hypothesis, albeit a reasonable one. Do you disagree?
These are just guesses... but maybe that's because of timing, or location, or that true frequency (as opposed to mundane causes) is relatively rare. Some even suppose that there may be a human faculty for seeing them that not all humans possess. For instance, it has been suggested that children are particularly susceptible, maybe not because of their wild imaginations but perhaps because they are more sensitive or something.
Anyway... my point is... even if you take 1% of the anecdotal reports that seem the most real and plausible and parse them for corroborating details, this is enough to form an entire school of work. That's basically what paranormal science has done.
The body of your argument is that you yourself have not experienced them. Well, I haven't experienced Russia but I know it's there because other people have told me about it.
I don't consider myself as a believer or a non-believer, merely an experiencer. I can't claim any mechanism for how it works, I just know what I saw and it doesn't have a mundane explanation. What I'm curious about is, if there is theoretically some kind of layer of space beyond the physical that is more subtle, how on Earth could we use physical means (like machines) to detect it? Are ghosts subatomic or a different kind of matter completely?
If people can see ghosts with the naked eye then that implies there is a physical detection threshold. And if some ghosts can move objects then there is an interaction.
If people can see ghosts with the naked eye then that implies there is a physical detection threshold. And if some ghosts can move objects then there is an interaction.
Here's my thing.
Ghosts are the spirits of living things that didn't or couldn't move on. Right? Or they are echoes of the past.
Either way, ever notice how we only have ghosts from a relatively recent time period? Like, what, does spiritual energy have a shelf life? Where are all the ghosts of dinosaurs? And cave men? Earth should be crawling with ghost!
And if these things exist, then there is a way to measure them. Ghosts aren't new to humanity and it's not like we haven't had folk investigating them in the past and present. But every attempt to scientifically document them has produced nothing. So we have a long history of attempts to document and measure these events to no success. Does it mean they absolutely do not exist? No, but it certainly is starting to seem highly unlikely.
When y'all figure out how to make a Ghost-O-Meter, come back and we can discuss it. But all things being equal, there are other explanations for the paranormal events other than ghosts and magic.
Really? There are explanations for objects moving on their own in homes? Not just a tiny bit, but a lot. Or people seeing apparitions of people they don't even know?
I'd love to hear your explanation for why, at 5 years old, the blankets on my bed were being pulled off of me in the middle of the night? Or why doors would fling open or slam without any source of wind or someone doing it? Or my whole family hearing people walking up and down the stairs at night, or in the hallways, even though everyone was in bed?
I must be making it up, right?
I'm a friend to science but it can't explain everything. There is a lot in the universe we don't know. And I disagree with your assertion that if it's happening, science should be able to detect it. If we don't have a ghost-o-meter then how should we go about doing that, scientifically?
In many reports the ghosts are clothed. How can clothes have spirits that live on?
What do you mean? Why would ghosts project themselves as naked?
Maybe I'm not understanding your question.
I don't know if you are making it up or not. All I know is that you have no measurement that it's ghosts, and until you do, it's far more likely that there is a rational, physical reason above ghosts and magic.
Just because science cannot currently "explain" a phenomenon, it doesn't mean magic did it. Come back with proof.
Who said anything about magic?
I wasn't talking about magical powers so I don't get this statement.
There's no rational explanation for what happened in my home other than it must be something paranormal. You weren't there. :shrug:
Like I said, I don't have to prove myself to you or the culture of science because it ultimately doesn't matter if you believe me or not. I know what I experienced and it happened to a home of skeptics and not people who had pre-existing beliefs in this stuff. We moved homes because of it.
What do you mean? Why would ghosts project themselves as naked?
Maybe I'm not understanding your question.
Really? There are explanations for objects moving on their own in homes? Not just a tiny bit, but a lot. Or people seeing apparitions of people they don't even know?
I'd love to hear your explanation for why, at 5 years old, the blankets on my bed were being pulled off of me in the middle of the night? Or why doors would fling open or slam without any source of wind or someone doing it? Or my whole family hearing people walking up and down the stairs at night, or in the hallways, even though everyone was in bed?
I must be making it up, right?
I'm a friend to science but it can't explain everything. There is a lot in the universe we don't know. And I disagree with your assertion that if it's happening, science should be able to detect it. If we don't have a ghost-o-meter then how should we go about doing that, scientifically?
From what little I've read on paranormal science, the only devices that can sometimes detect ghosts are EMF readers, but they don't exactly fall on the standard spectrum... which means they're on a spectrum beyond what the meters can detect or they are some kind other energy we don't yet understand.
OK, whatever. Magics and faeries and pixie dust sorts of things just don't seem very likely and for as long as humans have been looking for ghosts, we've never once been able to capture actual data on their existence. Things we ascribe to mysticism likely have roots in a physical phenomenon, not the dead coming back for whatever reason. But people can convince themselves of a wide array of things, and once we've made the decision that it must be X, then it's really hard to shake that notion.
So have at it then, sorry that ghosts chased you out of your house.
I grew up in a haunted house, it's no joke. And my family was hardcore Catholic... you know, the kind that likes to deny that paranormal stuff exists. Well, we didn't have that luxury. We ended up moving. Nothing violent happened, just stuff that was creepy as hell on a regular basis. It was hell when I was a kid because the ghost liked to mess with me the most. So I slept in my older sister's room half the time.
Please provide specific examples of the hauntings. This is interesting. Ever heard of a place called Hinton Ampner?