What are the minimally required attributes that a thing must have in order to be considered a god?
I'm not taking about your god if you believe in one, I'm talking about the abstract concept of a god. What criteria must a thing meet before you would be willing to allow it to have the designation of a god.
My list:
1.) It must have an intelligence above and beyond what humans would be capable of attaining.
2.) It must have an abilities above and beyond what humans would be capable of attaining.
3.) It must have a stake in the day to day happenings of our universe.
4.) It must regularly influence our world, and it must do so based upon some moral code.
Only if you're assuming god can't be anything other than a supernatural anthropomorphic being. But that seems rather limiting, and clearly displays how limited the human mind really is. Raise someone in an Abrahamic society, and they don't think god can be anything other than an Yahweh-esque, daddy figure sort of god.
Why would the controlling force of the universe have something as limited as an intellect when it could simply be everything simultaneously? Why would it have something as flawed and volitile as personal experiences, as required for "having a stake"? For that matter, why would it have a stake in anything? It could do whatever it wants and answers to no one. Why would it be interested in something as mundane as the happenings of our little planet? Why would god concern themselves with something as slippery, inconsistent, and ultimately self-serving as the human concept of morals?
I mean, it could. But why is that a requirement for a god? That seems rather... well, primitive, to me, for the creator of the known universe.
I mean, by the definition you've given, some teenaged alien script kiddy from a race of more advanced beings in another galaxy could quite easily be our god. And I suppose that might explain why our race tends to be such a mess.
But even humans have branched out from that sort of definition quite a bit, considering things like natural occurrences or even collective consciousness to be god. All sorts of things with no sentient intellect, no interest in us, and certainly no morals, have been called gods.
While considering all the things to which humans have ascribed the word "god," and all the possibilities that might really exist that would fit that scope, I am lead to the conclusion that the only way to define god -- which let's keep in mind, is a completely human concept -- is "sacred force."
"Sacred" is a totally subjective criteria, and applies only to humans, not to god itself. So what meaning does that have? None, really.
So we're left with "force." Well, lots of things are forces, both real and mythical. And humans have described lots of them as "god," both real and mythical.
It's a rather meaningless question, all-in-all.