- Joined
- Mar 16, 2009
- Messages
- 47,459
- Reaction score
- 53,140
- Location
- Dixie
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: How much should our faith impact our lives?
Generally speaking I don't disagree with anything you said, at least not entirely.
Personally, I prefer the way it was done when I was in school, the way my biology teacher in HS handled it. As close to a quote as I can manage... "I am going to teach you about evolution, because that is the prevailing theory in science about how life came to be. I know that many of you are Christians and are familiar with the arguments about Creationism versus Evolution: I am not going to address that in any way. Your religious beliefs are your own business. This, however, is a science class and I will be teaching science, not religion. You are free to believe or disbelieve whatever you wish, but you need to learn the theory of evolution in order to pass the tests regardless of what your personal or family beliefs may be. That is the first and last time I will address the religious aspect of this issue, nor will I allow class to be derailed arguing about creation vs evolution."
A couple of people wanted to press him for which he believed was correct, and he steadfastly refused to say. His answer was "The position of the school district is that as an authority figure in the eyes of the students, it is not appropriate for me to influence you one way or the other, but merely to teach the curriculum of the class."
Personally, I felt this was the appropriate way to handle a very contentious issue.
Well, I think this is where the disconnect tends to come up. Nobody expects an elected official to just ignore their own religious beliefs completely. But when it comes to deciding policy at any legislative level, there needs to be a filter there. Because that's a constitutional obligation. If an official's personal religious beliefs compel them to violate their oath of office, they shouldn't be holding that office. Upholding the constitution means "passing no laws respecting an establishment of religion." It means they can't push their religion onto the rest of us. An elected official shouldn't be proposing legislation that demands young-earth creationism be taught alongside evolution in a science classroom, because that's a religious belief and not a scientific one. A public school has absolutely no business pushing Hinduism or Islam or Catholocism on my child.
And that's where all of the "pushback" or "pressure" is coming from. Yes, it's hard to separate yourself from your religious beliefs. But if you can't do that, don't take on a job that requires it.
Some random guy from Idaho who believes the earth is 6000 years old? Nobody cares. When he expresses that idea, people will challenge it. They'll respond with their own beliefs. But that's just freedom of speech going in both directions.
Generally speaking I don't disagree with anything you said, at least not entirely.
Personally, I prefer the way it was done when I was in school, the way my biology teacher in HS handled it. As close to a quote as I can manage... "I am going to teach you about evolution, because that is the prevailing theory in science about how life came to be. I know that many of you are Christians and are familiar with the arguments about Creationism versus Evolution: I am not going to address that in any way. Your religious beliefs are your own business. This, however, is a science class and I will be teaching science, not religion. You are free to believe or disbelieve whatever you wish, but you need to learn the theory of evolution in order to pass the tests regardless of what your personal or family beliefs may be. That is the first and last time I will address the religious aspect of this issue, nor will I allow class to be derailed arguing about creation vs evolution."
A couple of people wanted to press him for which he believed was correct, and he steadfastly refused to say. His answer was "The position of the school district is that as an authority figure in the eyes of the students, it is not appropriate for me to influence you one way or the other, but merely to teach the curriculum of the class."
Personally, I felt this was the appropriate way to handle a very contentious issue.