- Joined
- Mar 4, 2008
- Messages
- 14,102
- Reaction score
- 3,919
- Location
- New Jersey
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Not really. As explained.
In fact, I 'll rephrase what I said before: No blind guesses at all - with or without that particular statement from the NAS.
Furthermore.....
So many Christians believed that science will never be able to prove that God does not exist, but in fact will most likely prove that He does.....even if they hadn't seen that statement from the NAS. I believed that, too.
Many religious scientists who'd founded the disciplines of science were deeply religious, and some were inspired and vindicated by their discoveries.
I was surprised to see the NAS coming right out to state that publicly since I've partly bought into Dawkins' and his minions' propaganda that science and religion are opposed to each other. That turned out to be the biggest lie from Dawkins and the New Atheists!
I'm not saying there's anything wrong about "blind guesses." I'm saying you're using that term inappropriately when it comes to this religious faith.....
......a faith which btw, relies on this Book that had given so many prophecies that had come true. No BLIND GUESSES about those prophecies -
in fact, they're a statement of what's going to happen, and they did happen. Some are intimate information that only the Creator would know about His own creation.
And as we now see, science is affirming some information that were DECLARED in the Bible:
Starting from the very first three introductory words - that the universe has a beginning.
Therefore, this particular faith isn't dependent on any blind guesses at all.
What's been DECLARED have been, or are being confirmed.
Yeah, yeah.
Faith!
Your "faith" is simply you insisting that your BLIND GUESS about the REALITY of existence...is correct.
We agree.
You just don't realize it.