• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Jesus' house? 1st-century structure may be where he grew up

No they weren't. Cob construction was not uncommon for the region, as were brick homes and tents.

OK...have that if you want.

Nevertheless, wood was not common.

Your point was that this was curious because, as a carpenter, he should have been loyal to his profession. Whether we add Cobb, brick and textiles to the mix or not, the fact remains there is nothing uncommon about it. Wood was not an option.
 
Last edited:
What an idiotic post. What are you, and archaeology denier? :roll:
Except it appears that there is no actual archaeological evidence linking this house with Jesus. It's just an old house from around about the right period, no?
 
Except it appears that there is no actual archaeological evidence linking this house with Jesus. It's just an old house from around about the right period, no?
That's not why the post was idiotic.
 
Back
Top Bottom