1. Tosca1 gives all these arguments about Rich People in the bible that were good ... as if I made an argument against that possibility.
No he hasn't
2. Ancient Israel was mainly a landed society, there were poor People, but the goal was to NOT have poor People as stated in Deuteronomy, which is why you had social justice policies in the commandments and why the prophets constantly houned on social justice.
no it wasn't. there is nothing like that at all on deuteronomy. again your misinterpritation has already been proven. no where did anyone seize someone elses assets and give it to the poor. Land was given back to the original owners, debts were forgiven, but beyond that no other asset was taken from someone and given to the poor.
3. Jon didn't live in a society run by God fearing People .... that's my point, he was not part of the nation of Israel.
First off his name is Job not jon. you don't even know who you were talking about. Yes Job was a God fearing man which is why he was tried and temped and basically destroyed by Satan. For his Faithfulness God gave him back more than what he lost. Yes he was.
4. Read what Psalm 72 is about, it's a social justice poem.
No it isn't you have no clue about what you are talking about. It is a prayer from david to solomon that he be a wise king.
5. Where did I mention wealth redistribution.
Umm that is what social justice is.
6. You posted other people's opinion, i.e. an argument from authority, I can post links to other theologians, but it doesn't mean ****, what matters is the actual text.
WRONG again. i didn't post peoples opinions i posted expert translations that show what i am saying is correct. that is what happens in an argument. You on the other hand are posting your opinion which has been proven wrong time and time again.
Throughout the scriptures the welfare of the People, especially the poor, and social justice were ALWAYS a priority over property and profit, ALWAYS.
*SIGH* the bible commands us to help the poor and to look after them. It doesn't say that we have to give up everything we own or allow it to be taken. that you are to be a cheerful giver. not someone take what you earn so that someone else may have it.
this is why your interpritation is corrupted. you don't understand the difference between free will of being a cheerful giver and wealth redistribution.
No the bible never preached anything against owning property or profit except when you put it above everything else.
The Whole point of this thread was to show the Connection between Acts 2 and 4, Luke 4 and Deuteronomy 15 ... it seams so far you haven't even touched the entire point of my thread.
No that isn't the whole point of the thread. the point of the thread is to try and push some anti-wealth and social justice wealth distribution of the bible.
many people have attempted the same thing.
they are simply not correct. the bible does not preach against anything about making money or owning property. it says nothing about giving up what you own to someone else. as i have proven even the later christians own property. they held private money as well.
however they shared with each other as they were in need.
what it does preach against is what you are doing and that is attempting to distort the bible for your own ideology.
i have proven this time and time again. to the point i have no need of further response to you. you can continue to distort the bible only people that know better won't listen.
i am trying to prevent people that don't know better from being mislead.