• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The Possibility of Jesus's Wife: A Matter of Christian Debate Then and Now

Jack Hays

Traveler
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
94,823
Reaction score
28,342
Location
Williamsburg, Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
This is a fascinating discussion that illuminates Christian debates both centuries ago and just yesterday. :peace


The Wife of Jesus Tale

An investigation into the origins of a scrap of papyrus raises more questions than it resolves
BY CHARLOTTE ALLEN

After an 18-month trial separation, “Jesus’ wife” is back with her man. Only this time with a postnup, a distinctly limited right to the marital property she has previously claimed, and a continuing unresolved debate over whether that big diamond on her ring finger is real or fake.

On the evening of September 18, 2012, Karen L. King, a professor at Harvard Divinity School and a longtime publicizer of Gnosticism and other “alternative Christianities” of the ancient world, surprised her fellow academics attending a Coptic conference in Rome with the unveiling of a papyrus document that she said dated to the fourth century a.d. The papyrus, actually a tiny 1.5-by-3-inch scrap apparently torn or cut from a larger sheet, appeared to state—for the first time in recorded history—that Jesus of Nazareth was married. Among the eight lines of choppy, crudely lettered text in Coptic, an ancient Egyptian language, were the words “Jesus said to ...
 
That people think that problems of authenticity do not matter to old documents is quite revealing about how bad we are at doing history more than a few hundred years old.
 
Will you all give it a rest? After all, a piece of paper with no historical legitimacy has spoken!
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    65.7 KB · Views: 87
Will you all give it a rest? After all, a piece of paper with no historical legitimacy has spoken!

I have no dog in this fight. I just thought it was an interesting debate, as the OP makes clear.:peace
 
I have no dog in this fight. I just thought it was an interesting debate, as the OP makes clear.:peace

It's not that interesting. There is no good evidence that Jesus was married.
 
Will you all give it a rest? After all, a piece of paper with no historical legitimacy has spoken!

bible6.jpg
 
Are you claiming that the Bible is not a valid historical source of information regarding the events it records?

Depends on which books you read, some have value as a historical source and some don't.
 
Actually, with Harvard's massive endowment I doubt money was the motive.:peace
Money is almost always a motive.....that and the tantalizing prospect of more recognition in regards to such a controversial "finding"? :shrug:
 
Depends on which books you read, some have value as a historical source and some don't.
I'm curious here. Which books of the Bible have absolutely no value as historical sources?
 
Harvard doesn't lose money by admitting students, do they?

They have seriously discussed eliminating tuition. Their endowment is larger than the next several combined. They did not go for it because of money.:peace
 
They have seriously discussed eliminating tuition. Their endowment is larger than the next several combined. They did not go for it because of money.:peace

I'll believe it when I see it.
 
Money is almost always a motive.....that and the tantalizing prospect of more recognition in regards to such a controversial "finding"? :shrug:

The latter but not the former. Harvard simply doesn't need it.:peace
 
A university with an endowment of $32B does not begin a controversy to get money.:peace

[h=3]America's biggest college endowments get even bigger ...[/h]money.cnn.com/2014/01/28/pf/.../university-endowments/‎CNNMoney


Jan 28, 2014 - America's biggest college endowments get even bigger. By Melanie Hicken @melhicken January 28, 2014: 3:13 PM ET. harvard university ...

Sure it does, for money and attention. Besides, it's not as if the money makes the finding valid. It's still a worthless piece of paper with no context and absolutely no reason to believe that it is true even if properly interpreted.
 
Sure it does, for money and attention. Besides, it's not as if the money makes the finding valid. It's still a worthless piece of paper with no context and absolutely no reason to believe that it is true even if properly interpreted.

That's fine. I'm agnostic and I don't care. I just thought it was interesting.:peace
 
Not at all. Alumni giving is the most important source. Research and publications matter little.:peace

Not at all? Hmmm, interesting. I find it difficult to believe that tons of money would be donated to universities which were not on the "cutting edge" of research? I have read Dr. King's extensive list of research and publications in regards to the "marital status" of Jesus, btw. She has not exactly been an "idle" researcher. :shrug:
 
Back
Top Bottom