• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Archeology supports the bible

Nothing you have cited here proves the existence of God. It only provides some corroboration of some things cited in the Bible. It in no way supports the premise that there is a creator. Nobody denies that the Judeo Christian belief system has existed for thousands of years in one form or another. The basis for that belief, the Christian God, has yet to be substantiated. All that has been supported here is that there were in fact followers of this dogma through history. Okay.

Archaeology supports that religion existed. It does not however support the existence of god. And let's face it, that's what you are really trying to flip here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom