- Joined
- Oct 12, 2013
- Messages
- 6,112
- Reaction score
- 987
- Location
- (none)
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Communist
1 Timothy 3:12 NIV said:12 A deacon must be faithful to his wife and must manage his children and his household well.
1 Timothy 3:12 KJV said:12 Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well.
They don't say the same thing but it's pretty clear both reference a married man.
Romans 16:1 KJV said:I commend unto you Phebe our sister, which is a servant of the church which is at Cenchrea:
Romans 16:1 NIV said:I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a deacon[a] of the church in Cenchreae.
My church has women deacons not based upon the 1 Timothy 3:12 reference but based upon the Romans 16:1 reference. My church was founded in 1896. The New testament of NIV was created in 1973. How did the NIV achieve such authority over church business when it is clearly a different document entirely?
Published in 2001Romans 16:1 ESV said:1 I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a servant[a] of the church at Cenchreae,
Published in 1900Romans 16:1 ASV said:1 I commend unto you Phoebe our sister, who is a servant of the church that is at Cenchreae:
published in 1993Romans 16:1 The Message said:1 Be sure to welcome our friend Phoebe in the way of the Master, with all the generous hospitality we Christians are famous for. I heartily endorse both her and her work. She’s a key representative of the church at Cenchrea.
published in 1978Romans 16:1 NCV said:I recommend to you our sister Phoebe, who is a helper[a] in the church in Cenchrea.
Published in 1961 (This is the Bible of the Jehovah Witness which some people claim mirror the NIV. Nope. Phoebe still isn't an officer of the church in the NWT.)Romans 16:1 New World Translation said:I am introducing* to you Phoe′be, our sister, who is a minister of the congregation that is in Cen′chre·ae,
No other translation makes Phoebe into a church officer that I have been able to find. What social movement was going on in 1973 that would influence a deliberate corruption of the scripture? Hmmm. Oh yeah. Wasn't there a big woman's right movement going on at that time?
Anybody else care to sift through all 200+ English translations of Romans 16:1. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that the NIV is the only one altering historical information for social modification purposes.
Last edited: