• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Explain difference in "depopulation" and mass murder ... thanks

RAMOSS said:
If families were limited to 2 max per family, there are people who do not even have 2, and there would be a population decrease.
Click to expand...

True enough, but that is effectively moving the goal posts of S&M's argument, by adding in a new factor.
 
Crovax said:
Actually it is, the replacement level is 2.1
Click to expand...

Is that supposed to be reading 2.1 as in for every one who dies 2.1 people replace them, or that for every 2 that dies there is one replacement?
 
maquiscat said:
Is that supposed to be reading 2.1 as in for every one who dies 2.1 people replace them, or that for every 2 that dies there is one replacement?
Click to expand...

It’s that every woman needs to have 2.1 babies to keep the population at the same level
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
And that has been part of a historical trend going back hundreds of years
Click to expand...

Yes and it’s falling relatively quick it was over 5 in the 1950’s and 3.38 in the 90’s, we will be at/below the replacement level by 2050 and then it will take about 32 years to see the population start to drop.
 
Crovax said:
Yes and it’s falling relatively quick it was 3.38 in the 90’s we will be at/below the replacement level by 2050 and then it will take about 32 years to see the population start to drop.
Click to expand...

Wait, now I am confusing two different statistics.

The birthrate was the one I was referring to, not to fertility.
 
maquiscat said:
Is that supposed to be reading 2.1 as in for every one who dies 2.1 people replace them, or that for every 2 that dies there is one replacement?
Click to expand...

That is 2.1 children per couple.
 
SmokeAndMirrors said:
That is... what I said. Wut?
Click to expand...

I did miss part of a line in there it seems. Without it it seems you are arguing that we are depopulating naturally. My bad.
 
Crovax said:
It’s that every woman needs to have 2.1 babies to keep the population at the same level
Click to expand...

That's per woman, not per person. Naturally a woman has to have one to replace her and one to replace the father, to maintain population levels. The .1 is probably a surge factor to account for those who die before procreating, or are incapable of it.
 
maquiscat said:
That's per woman, not per person. Naturally a woman has to have one to replace her and one to replace the father, to maintain population levels. The .1 is probably a surge factor to account for those who die before procreating, or are incapable of it.
Click to expand...

Right the point being the population would decline if each woman had 2 babies
 
John Prewett said:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/s...ce-reducing-population-is-best-solution-to-cl
https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-11...or-urgent-depopulation-efforts-in-africa.html


View attachment 67225075
Click to expand...

If you ever wanted an example of how religion poisons practically everything then this is it.

The debate should be about how poverty and lack of education has prolonged suffering in a continent that has had more than it's fair share of suffering.

Yet, here we see deluded Western people fighting their Pro-Life battle by proxy in a continent that they see as a rich resource for people that will 'willingly' accept their delusion. Here we see deluded Western people scrambling to establish a theological hegemony for their particular delusion of choice in the continent, screaming the rhetoric of a 'Black Holocaust' and a post Imperial Western hegemony.

If I was feeling generous about this I would concede that it is the extremist political wings of religions that are poisoning this situation but, it's becoming increasingly difficult to figure out just how many moderate poisoners there actually are.
 
Crovax said:
Right the point being the population would decline if each woman had 2 babies
Click to expand...

My point had been that if we were having births at 2 per person, which would be 4 per woman, then we would hold about even. But you came in saying that we were already there thus depopulating. See where I was getting confused.
 
Quag said:
If you are going to post photos rather than actual make a point could you at least make them large enough so we can read whatever they say?
Click to expand...

Other forum systems allow them to be posted larger. This forum system declares that all the MEME's I've tried to post via URL are "too large"

.....but they post fine at other forums.1 z KISSINGER POPE DEPOPULATION.jpg

I've tried but don't know how to make it post any larger ..... in my computer it is extra large
 
Last edited:
Anybody can Google: Kissinger and Depopulation and quickly see that Kissinger (a top kingpin of the Globalist) does not mean a slow gradual "depopulation" ......
 
John Prewett said:
Anybody can Google: Kissinger and Depopulation and quickly see that Kissinger (a top kingpin of the Globalist) does not mean a slow gradual "depopulation" ......
Click to expand...

Anybody can put any nonsense they like on the net.
 
John Prewett said:
Other forum systems allow them to be posted larger. This forum system declares that all the MEME's I've tried to post via URL are "too large"

.....but they post fine at other forums.View attachment 67225118

I've tried but don't know how to make it post any larger ..... in my computer it is extra large
Click to expand...

There are 7 pics in that montage, try posting them as 7 different pics
 
John Prewett said:
Anybody can Google: Kissinger and Depopulation and quickly see that Kissinger (a top kingpin of the Globalist) does not mean a slow gradual "depopulation" ......
Click to expand...
If that’s what he meant, he was wrong. I don’t see how that’s relevant to the articles you linked in the OP about the Vatican and Prince William.

Neither of them are actually quoted using the word “depopulation” as it happens. That was only the choice of wording by the journalists/editors or negative quotes from others. You appear to have fallen for the spin.
 
These countries with exploding birth rates should be given birth control galore. Also, Western charity is aiding the problem. They need to cut it off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom