• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Creating an Economic Model: Create a Synthesis for Your Economic Model

Axis

Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2017
Messages
79
Reaction score
6
Location
Australia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Socialist
If you were to pick or create a model for economic growth and development. What would you?

Create [if you are properly prepared to do so] a synthesis that explains your economic paradigm - alike that of the EU's; e.g. The Nordic, the Mediterranean, Continental, and the Anglo-Saxon, models.
 
As I just previously stated in another thread, the economic models are not mutually exclusive.

They can be mixed together with the best ideas from each.
 
As I just previously stated in another thread, the economic models are not mutually exclusive.

They can be mixed together with the best ideas from each.

Which is what the EU models are. They are originally socially and economically interrelated constituencies. I was interested with what other people [or partisans acquiesce already; but then though, explaining why they are resolved on an already made social model]; had, to offer - with their personal social models.
 
If you were to pick or create a model for economic growth and development. What would you?

Create [if you are properly prepared to do so] a synthesis that explains your economic paradigm - alike that of the EU's; e.g. The Nordic, the Mediterranean, Continental, and the Anglo-Saxon, models.

I am uncomfortable with the term model here. What exactly do you mean by 'eu model' or 'Continental model'?
 
As I just previously stated in another thread, the economic models are not mutually exclusive.

They can be mixed together with the best ideas from each.

It all depends on what one wants to do and what one means by 'model'. If 'formal model' is meant theory all those models are morphs of the same model. The difference is only in the formulation of certain motivators, restrictions or property rights.
It we are talking non formal model, we are not really in economics as much as in politcal theory or more usually in ideology.
 
I understand. You meant; economic philosophers that contributed greatly to political natures¹ like, feudalism, communism, capitalism, socialism - branching out to authoritarianism, totalitarianism, under bureaucracy's like, corporatocracy, plutocracy, kratocracy, meritocracy, etc.


¹like the Keynesian theory, Marxism, Weberianism, and so on.
 
I understand. You meant; economic philosophers that contributed greatly to political natures¹ like, feudalism, communism, capitalism, socialism - branching out to authoritarianism, totalitarianism, under bureaucracy's like, corporatocracy, plutocracy, kratocracy, meritocracy, etc.


¹like the Keynesian theory, Marxism, Weberianism, and so on.

That was directed to MovingPictures.
 
If you were to pick or create a model for economic growth and development. What would you?

Create [if you are properly prepared to do so] a synthesis that explains your economic paradigm - alike that of the EU's; e.g. The Nordic, the Mediterranean, Continental, and the Anglo-Saxon, models.

Banned.
 
Judeo-Christian model is the only model that works. Bring your tithes and offerings to the storehouse.
If every doctor did that, there would be no need for medical insurance. If every engineer did that, there would be no need for taxes. There would be no hunger or want of any kind.
It's just 10 percent...
 
Back
Top Bottom