• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Massacres in Myanmar[W:99]

Myanmar Islam versus Buddhist conflict should be seen in light of the following:
During the nine-month-long Bangladesh war (1971) ......, members of the Pakistani (Muslim) military and supporting Islamist militias .....

killed up to 3,000,000 people and raped between 200,000 and 400,000 Bangladeshi women,according to Bangladeshi and Indian sources,
in a systematic campaign of genocidal rape.
………….
The actions against women were supported by Muslim religious leaders, who declared that Bengali women were gonimoter maal
(Bengali for "public property").

And CENTURIES of Muslim aggression against Hindus and Buddhist in India and Afghanistan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_genocide
https://themuslimissue.wordpress.co...on-of-india-the-greatest-genocide-in-history/
https://youtu.be/VPRwzB_1YEk
 
John Prewett said:
Myanmar Islam versus Buddhist conflict should be seen in light of the following:
During the nine-month-long Bangladesh war (1971) ......, members of the Pakistani (Muslim) military and supporting Islamist militias .....

killed up to 3,000,000 people and raped between 200,000 and 400,000 Bangladeshi women,according to Bangladeshi and Indian sources,
in a systematic campaign of genocidal rape.
………….
The actions against women were supported by Muslim religious leaders, who declared that Bengali women were gonimoter maal
(Bengali for "public property")...............................~
Click to expand...
The problem you appear to be having with history here, lies in you seemingly confusing two conflicts that completely differ.

Where in the Rohingya issue here, depending on the preferred narrative, we either have an ethnic group (that also happens to be Muslim) oppressed by the Burmese military, or we have an ethnic (Muslim) group that provoked its suppression by warring on Buddhists (88% of the population).

The truth is probably somewhere in the middle but with the centuries history long history of the suppression of Ronhingyas, nowhere near the centre.

The example that you cite above was Muslims warring on Muslims, namely (primarily) Punjabi of what was West Pakistan at the time, warring upon Bengalis in what was East Pakistan at the time.

Your analogy fails utterly.
 
John Prewett said:
Myanmar Islam versus Buddhist conflict should be seen in light of the following:
During the nine-month-long Bangladesh war (1971) ......, members of the Pakistani (Muslim) military and supporting Islamist militias .....

killed up to 3,000,000 people and raped between 200,000 and 400,000 Bangladeshi women,according to Bangladeshi and Indian sources,
in a systematic campaign of genocidal rape.
………….
The actions against women were supported by Muslim religious leaders, who declared that Bengali women were gonimoter maal
(Bengali for "public property").

And CENTURIES of Muslim aggression against Hindus and Buddhist in India and Afghanistan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_genocide
https://themuslimissue.wordpress.co...on-of-india-the-greatest-genocide-in-history/
https://youtu.be/VPRwzB_1YEk
Click to expand...

None of which has anything to do with the "Myanmar" government trying to wipe out its Muslim populace
 
John Prewett said:
Myanmar Islam versus Buddhist conflict should be seen in light of the following:
During the nine-month-long Bangladesh war (1971) ......, members of the Pakistani (Muslim) military and supporting Islamist militias .....

killed up to 3,000,000 people and raped between 200,000 and 400,000 Bangladeshi women,according to Bangladeshi and Indian sources,
in a systematic campaign of genocidal rape.
………….
The actions against women were supported by Muslim religious leaders, who declared that Bengali women were gonimoter maal
(Bengali for "public property").

And CENTURIES of Muslim aggression against Hindus and Buddhist in India and Afghanistan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_genocide
https://themuslimissue.wordpress.co...on-of-india-the-greatest-genocide-in-history/
https://youtu.be/VPRwzB_1YEk
Click to expand...

None of that is relevant in the least to the matter at hand.

You strike me as a most familiar voice of ignorance.

Hmmmmm.....
 
Over the course of the past 1400 years, no group has done genocide better than Muslims. Least of all the Buddhist. Muslim supporters are genocide supporters.
 
Chagos said:
The problem you appear to be having with history here, lies in you seemingly confusing two conflicts that completely differ.

Where in the Rohingya issue here, depending on the preferred narrative, we either have an ethnic group (that also happens to be Muslim) oppressed by the Burmese military, or we have an ethnic (Muslim) group that provoked its suppression by warring on Buddhists (88% of the population).

The truth is probably somewhere in the middle but with the centuries history long history of the suppression of Ronhingyas, nowhere near the centre.

The example that you cite above was Muslims warring on Muslims, namely (primarily) Punjabi of what was West Pakistan at the time, warring upon Bengalis in what was East Pakistan at the time.

Your analogy fails utterly.
Click to expand...

They always did.
 
For centuries anti-Christ liars have known that the NT revealed Christ (only Christ recognized by His followers) was a non-violent person. Mainly just went around healing people.

Still the anti-Christ liars are compelled to attach the label "Christian" to people who engage in mass murder ....

"CHURCH" according to the NT means the people who belong to Jesus Christ. "His" people. Book of Acts reveals The Church.

A GREAT deception took place in 380ad.

The Roman Emperor empowered a religious group whose binding doctrine was Trinitarianism ....
and
this Trinitarian group claimed to be "The Church"
and
the Roman establishment [bunch of assorted Pagans]
claimed this newly empowered CULT was "The Church."

So from 380ad onward, the worldly have been deceived as to who and where and what is "The Church".
All the modern christianish “churches” [“cults, denominations”] evolved from the imitation “church” empowered by the Roman Empire in 380ad.
The foundation the Church rest upon is the confession Peter made …. Not Peter personally. Much NT scripture shows the one and only head of Jesus’s Church is Jesus. Papist and Trinitarians don’t believe scripture. They believe various interpretations of scripture … and that is not the same as believing/heeding scripture.

Famous example of putting interpretation of scripture over scripture:
“call no man father”

Roman Catholicism will give you scads of interpretive pretext to NOT heed the simple “call no man father”


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_chur...man_Empire

"Nicene "Trinitarian" Christianity became the state church of the Roman Empire with the Edict of Thessalonica in 380 CE,
when Emperor Theodosius I made it the Empire's sole authorized religion"
 
The jihad is already coming. All the talking heads and "intellectuals" of the Islamic world have weighed in on this new jihad, and the vote is unanimous except for Bangladesh and Malaysia and Indonesia but f*ck them, right?Now the MSM propaganda war can really kick in. Soon the ranks of the Rohingya will be swelling with volunteers from all over the Islamic world, the best and brightest of the Ummah who gave us ISIS last time they got together for a cause.

Let's play this out again; maybe this time it will be one of mythical jihads of love or introspection, or whatever bullsh*t the muslim apologists are always talking about.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom