• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The "Republican" part of the Bible

Every politician uses bible quotes to reinforce what they already believe in. It isn't a new thing.
 
I wasn't aware the bible was written by Republicans.

It totally was. For instance:

-When people asked Jesus to heal them, he told them to pull themselves up by the bootstraps and heal themselves.
-When they asked him to feed them, he told them to get a job.
-He said that the rich are the most qualified people to get into Heaven.
-And there was no way he was going to fall for the "let an angry mob decide who gets released and who gets crucified" trick.
 
Subtitle should be "Yale Divinity Prof Instructs Rubio on Which Parts of the Bible to Quote." :roll:

That's the part which is actually the funniest.
 
It totally was. For instance:

-When people asked Jesus to heal them, he told them to pull themselves up by the bootstraps and heal themselves.
-When they asked him to feed them, he told them to get a job.
-He said that the rich are the most qualified people to get into Heaven.
-And there was no way he was going to fall for the "let an angry mob decide who gets released and who gets crucified" trick.



The sluggard craves and gets nothing, but the desires of the diligent are fully satisfied. Proverbs 13:4
 
The sluggard craves and gets nothing, but the desires of the diligent are fully satisfied. Proverbs 13:4

Oh yeah, Proverbs. Lots of good stuff in there. Also lots of incredibly bad stuff.
 
The sluggard craves and gets nothing, but the desires of the diligent are fully satisfied. Proverbs 13:4

Duety 15.8 Rather, you shall open your hand to him, and you shall lend him sufficient for his needs, which he is lacking.

(commentary by rambam)

[Rather] you shall open [your hand]: Even many times.
[Rather] you shall open [your hand]
. Here, the word כִּי has the meaning of “rather” [whereas in verse 7 it means “if,” and in verse 10, “because”].
and you shall lend: If he does not want [your money] as a [charitable] gift, give it to him as a loan. — [Sifrei ; Keth. 67b]
[lend him] sufficient for his needs: However, you are not commanded to make him wealthy. — [Sifrei] די מחסורו: ואי אתה
[sufficient for his needs,] what he is lacking: Even a horse to ride on and a servant to run before him [if he is accustomed to this type of lifestyle]. - [Sifrei; Keth. 67b]
he [is lacking]:
 
It totally was. For instance:

-When people asked Jesus to heal them, he told them to pull themselves up by the bootstraps and heal themselves.
-When they asked him to feed them, he told them to get a job.
-He said that the rich are the most qualified people to get into Heaven.
-And there was no way he was going to fall for the "let an angry mob decide who gets released and who gets crucified" trick.
Jesus very well could have been black:

-He liked gospel.
-He called people brother.
-He couldn't get a fair trial.
 
Jesus very well could have been black:

-He liked gospel.
-He called people brother.
-He couldn't get a fair trial.

Could!!!!!

This might be an amusing thread in its own right. What makes you think he was not black? Or at least what is considered not to be white caucasian by todays standard or the usual portail of jesus as being white.
 
Jesus very well could have been black:

-He liked gospel.
-He called people brother.
-He couldn't get a fair trial.

....Holy ****, Hulk Hogan could be the re-incarnation of Jesus.


But yeah, LUL at the professor with the "Republican" part of the bible comment. I think the point he was trying to make was that people pick and choose what part of the bible they want to highlight. While true, it's HILLARIOUS that he's trying to make that out to be some kind of Republican thing, when in reality that's pretty much true of EVERYONE dealing with religion.
 
Could!!!!!

This might be an amusing thread in its own right. What makes you think he was not black? Or at least what is considered not to be white caucasian by todays standard or the usual portail of jesus as being white.
Jesus could have been a woman:

-He fed a crowd at a moments notice when there was no food.
- He kept trying to get a message across to a bunch of men who didn't get it.
-Even when he was dead he had to get up again because there was more work to do.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Folks, a bit of joking is fine, but lets at least make your post somewhat topical as well please
 
Article's title: "Politico Scolds Rubio for Tweeting Out 'Republican' Part of the Bible"

Subtitle should be "Yale Divinity Prof Instructs Rubio on Which Parts of the Bible to Quote." :roll:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortn...ing-out-republican-part-of-the-bible-n2352780

This is a good example of why you should not let others do your thinking for you. From the source article:

Did you know the book of Proverbs was written by a Republican? A biblical scholar at Politico Magazine tried to convince their readers of that conclusion over the weekend when they tweeted out this headline, "Marco Rubio Is Tweeting the Most Republican Part of the Bible."

Now, it is obvious that "republican part of the bible" meant the parts of the bible most republican in philosophy, but the article author tried to spin it otherwise, and then people see it and hey, it's an article, on the internets, it must be true, I better run out and share this with people.
 
This is a good example of why you should not let others do your thinking for you. From the source article:



Now, it is obvious that "republican part of the bible" meant the parts of the bible most republican in philosophy, but the article author tried to spin it otherwise, and then people see it and hey, it's an article, on the internets, it must be true, I better run out and share this with people.

And your post is an example of somebody going out of his way to snark. Not sure why.
 
The devil quoted scripture to Jesus when he was fasting in the desert.
 
I wasn't aware the bible was written by Republicans.

And I was not aware that a Yale Divinity Prof instructed Rubio on which parts of the Bible to quote.

Now, after reading the article --the Politico article, not the rightwing blog drek-- I am still not aware that a Yale diviniity professor instructed Rubio on which parts of the Bible to quote.
 
It didn't really happen, that's just an old tale.

Well, don't believe it. You don't catch me walking up to people on the street asking them "if they're saved" nor knocking on peoples doors. I'm like your Jew or neighborhood Muslim, I don't go walking up to random people trying to convert them. Or you might say I'm like most Catholics and Orthodox Christians in that way.

Even if one believes the story of Satan tempting Jesus in the desert is a work of fiction, the fact is works of fiction often have been used as literary methods of communicating moral lessons.

The moral lesson here with Satan tempting and quoting scripture to Jesus is that (aside from the fact even Satan can quote scripture) any wicked person can quote scripture to suit their purpose. That includes Republicans.



The Bible is full of moral lessons and it has dramatically impacted the historical development of what we term "Western Civilization" just as Hindu sacred scripture has influenced the historical development of India. Oh... many, many years ago one of the books I bought and read (I've read more books from the library than I've ever bought) was written by a Hindu Indian with the story set in modern times but it had a lot of Hindu theology interwoven in it. I could notice some but because I lack a great deal of understanding about Hinduism I am sure I missed a lot of its subtle features interwoven into the story. Great fictional novel though: The Death of Vishnu.

The Bible in Genesis presents in story format a vulnerability humans have: in the scenes between brothers Cain and Able. Jealousy can ultimately lead to homicide.

Jealousy (excessive desire for some good another has) can lead to envy (feeling or belief that for you to rise the good in another must fall or be trampled over--often expressed in the need to run another down to others) and envy can lead o murder (unjustifiable killing).

Judging by your comment here and your energy used to follow me into a different thread about "Dope in America" or whatever its called, and the product of your comment, I'm hazarding a guess you are auditioning for the role of Cain and think of me as having taken the stage role as Able, yeah? Of course.

You have free will like I do. You have an eternal soul as I do. Imagine a drug addict has a body and life just as a non-drug addict does. Do not they both choose to do with their body and life as they wish, and does not results in the end ultimately fall on them?

When nailed to the cross beside Jesus we have a choice--free will--to assume the role of one of the criminals. Jesus spoke of the two party American political system of his time against him. They were the "good people" they were "the righteous." They were the criminal on the cross that mocked him. But he asks them at one point in the New Testament, I think it was about John the Baptist, he said to them of the holier than thou two party system, "How is it the prostitutes and sinners recognized John the Baptist as a good man but you all did not?" I paraphrased.



What lessons will we take from stories?









 
Well, don't believe it. You don't catch me walking up to people on the street asking them "if they're saved" nor knocking on peoples doors. I'm like your Jew or neighborhood Muslim, I don't go walking up to random people trying to convert them. Or you might say I'm like most Catholics and Orthodox Christians in that way.

Even if one believes the story of Satan tempting Jesus in the desert is a work of fiction, the fact is works of fiction often have been used as literary methods of communicating moral lessons.

The moral lesson here with Satan tempting and quoting scripture to Jesus is that (aside from the fact even Satan can quote scripture) any wicked person can quote scripture to suit their purpose. That includes Republicans.



The Bible is full of moral lessons and it has dramatically impacted the historical development of what we term "Western Civilization" just as Hindu sacred scripture has influenced the historical development of India. Oh... many, many years ago one of the books I bought and read (I've read more books from the library than I've ever bought) was written by a Hindu Indian with the story set in modern times but it had a lot of Hindu theology interwoven in it. I could notice some but because I lack a great deal of understanding about Hinduism I am sure I missed a lot of its subtle features interwoven into the story. Great fictional novel though: The Death of Vishnu.

The Bible in Genesis presents in story format a vulnerability humans have: in the scenes between brothers Cain and Able. Jealousy can ultimately lead to homicide.

Jealousy (excessive desire for some good another has) can lead to envy (feeling or belief that for you to rise the good in another must fall or be trampled over--often expressed in the need to run another down to others) and envy can lead o murder (unjustifiable killing).

Judging by your comment here and your energy used to follow me into a different thread about "Dope in America" or whatever its called, and the product of your comment, I'm hazarding a guess you are auditioning for the role of Cain and think of me as having taken the stage role as Able, yeah? Of course.

You have free will like I do. You have an eternal soul as I do. Imagine a drug addict has a body and life just as a non-drug addict does. Do not they both choose to do with their body and life as they wish, and does not results in the end ultimately fall on them?

When nailed to the cross beside Jesus we have a choice--free will--to assume the role of one of the criminals. Jesus spoke of the two party American political system of his time against him. They were the "good people" they were "the righteous." They were the criminal on the cross that mocked him. But he asks them at one point in the New Testament, I think it was about John the Baptist, he said to them of the holier than thou two party system, "How is it the prostitutes and sinners recognized John the Baptist as a good man but you all did not?" I paraphrased.



What lessons will we take from stories?











The chances of me being nailed to a cross next to Jesus are very slim. One lesson I take from stories is that they are fiction.
 
Back
Top Bottom