• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Muslim Country and a Controversial Restriction on the Hijab

FastPace

DP Veteran
Joined
May 25, 2017
Messages
1,842
Reaction score
243
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Wait... a country where 95% of the population is Muslim places a restriction on wearing the hijab in public, that it can't be worn inside schools and universities?

Interesting. Not sure I saw that one coming.

And in this video (1st one) below, am I correct that those pro-hijab protestors fighting police are men? Why are the men so riled up and not the women, given they are the ones that wear them?

Oh boy... I imagine a US led coup being plotted, eventually, by Democrats and liberals under the holy title of "bringing freedom" and "democracy" to Azerbaijan. But wait... if money (Azerbaijan is oil rich) is involved you can be sure factions of Republicans (like McCain and Paul Ryan) will be on TV telling Americans the US must overthrow the brutal tyrants in Azerbaijan and support the "freedom fighters."


Published on Jan 27, 2014

The number of protests in Azerbaijan for the freedom to wear the hijab is growing, as are the questions surrounding those demonstrations—like who is behind them?



Published on Dec 10, 2015

In Iran, a protest has been held in front of Azerbaijan’s consulate in the northwestern city of Tabriz against Baku’s recent crackdown on Shia Muslims.
 
So, I have a request of Democrats and liberals--and McCain faction Republicans--please keep your nose out of the domestic affairs of the people of Azerbaijan. Do not finance and arm their "freedom fighter."

Leave their tyranny be:





And why don't you worry about your own domestic affairs, since you all have sooooooo much money to throw around (in pursuit of fixing other nations domestic problems):

 
Wait... a country where 95% of the population is Muslim places a restriction on wearing the hijab in public, that it can't be worn inside schools and universities?

Interesting. Not sure I saw that one coming.

And in this video (1st one) below, am I correct that those pro-hijab protestors fighting police are men? Why are the men so riled up and not the women, given they are the ones that wear them?

Oh boy... I imagine a US led coup being plotted, eventually, by Democrats and liberals under the holy title of "bringing freedom" and "democracy" to Azerbaijan. But wait... if money (Azerbaijan is oil rich) is involved you can be sure factions of Republicans (like McCain and Paul Ryan) will be on TV telling Americans the US must overthrow the brutal tyrants in Azerbaijan and support the "freedom fighters."







Hmm......it's a lot more likely that Russia ends up stepping in---and stepping on--- the Azeris given the on and off fighting between them and the Armenians---especially since Armenia won the last round.
 
You think the US is going to get involved in Azerbaijan because of some 3 1/2 year old protests?
 
I believe Turkey has similar restrictions on hijab, or has in the past, anyway. They may have gone away since the Islamists have been in control of the government. Since I don't think the government should make personal decisions for people, especially when it comes to religious observance, I don't agree with limitations on wearing hijab. I agree that it's odd that only men are protesting, but it's really none of my business, or the US government's business. Thank goodness there's no religiously mandated underwear.
 
You think the US is going to get involved in Azerbaijan because of some 3 1/2 year old protests?

Actually, the protests were 9 - 10 years ago and as noted in the OP but without emphasizing the fact, the hijab restriction applies only to students while attending schools which have uniform code restrictions. An observant Muslim woman may wear a hijab in public.
 
Actually, the protests were 9 - 10 years ago and as noted in the OP but without emphasizing the fact, the hijab restriction applies only to students while attending schools which have uniform code restrictions. An observant Muslim woman may wear a hijab in public.
To top it all, in Morocco (just to switch to another continent) you soon won't even be able to buy a Burqa or a Niqab, let alone wear either.

Morocco 'bans the burka' over fears that the garment is used to help carry out crimes | Daily Mail Online

And the filthy infidels:mrgreen: even ordered their policemen to shave as well as ordering their policewomen to quit the hijab altogether, all that as long as 14 years ago.

Muslim fury as Morocco bans beards for police - Telegraph
 
Actually, the protests were 9 - 10 years ago and as noted in the OP but without emphasizing the fact, the hijab restriction applies only to students while attending schools which have uniform code restrictions. An observant Muslim woman may wear a hijab in public.

Before American Democrats start getting on TV to tell Americans they must help freedom fighters (in reality terrorists they will be) in Azerbaijan over throw the tyrannical government, I'm saying right now to leave Azerbaijan alone.

Before a Democratic politician opened the hole under their nose most Americans likely never even heard or knew about the Ukraine (or Syria). Enough Americans can't point their own country out on a map.

All it takes to get most Americans behind any billion or trillion dollar funded conflict is for a Democratic or Republican politician to get up before TV cameras and use the words "freedom" and "democracy." Those two words ring with the same crusaders sound in most American ears as the cry, "Allah Akbar!" for many Muslims.


Muslims of Baku, Azerbaijan under their tyrannical, authoritarian government:


Which looks better than the freedom Americans brought to Muslims in Libya.
 
Before American Democrats start getting on TV .................~
Let me ask, are you from Azerbaidjan?

And if so, is your aim here to want American forces to keep out of there?

Because if either of the two apply (or even both), why not just say so? Instead of bombarding others with reams of billboarding vids.
 
Let me ask, are you from Azerbaidjan?

And if so, is your aim here to want American forces to keep out of there?

Because if either of the two apply (or even both), why not just say so? Instead of bombarding others with reams of billboarding vids.

I'm from Milwaukee with white and black ancestry and was reared Catholic from the cradle. I'm not Muslim. I prayer to the Blessed Holy Mother (Muslims give due honor to her too which is good to know and provides me with common ground with Muslims) the angles and saints. I pray to dead homies at times. And I'm pro-painted icons of saints. That should suffice to let you know what my religious sympathies are.

I'm not a fake Muslim sympathizer like many on the left and right, I am a real one, to the extent I wish the best even for Muslims and the global Ummah. That best wishes for them begins with objecting to my country financing, arming, and at times training lunatic Muslim radicals.

Imagine this... if the prevailing image of Muslims was one of the young women and men of Baku (I admit I am taken by and greatly admire that city and its people from what I see of it. I'm enamored with them.) then it would be extremely unlikely people in the USA and elsewhere would associate Muslims with people like Al Qaida, ISIS, or even just super conservative religious people demanding all women walk around in public with their heads covered.

It's not just white Christians drawing this association. It's Buddhist monks and Buddhist lay people too.

Muslim extremist have gotten into it with Asian Christian Filipinos (not white people) in the Philippines. They have gotten into it with Buddhists in Thailand (Buddhism is the state religion of Thailand). They have often gotten into violent conflicts with Hindus in India (both sides do great wrongs there). And of course they get into it with Jews in Israel.

Hey! I never even heard of Yazidi people, or that they had their own religion, until I hear on the news about Muslim extremist raping and killing these people. Had it not been for that I likely would never have known such a people exist on planet earth.

 
"
Before American Democrats start getting on TV to tell Americans they must help freedom fighters (in reality terrorists they will be) in Azerbaijan over throw the tyrannical government, I'm saying right now to leave Azerbaijan alone.

How is it that you figure the Democrats are going to do this when the only politicians who have gotten us into wars in Muslim countries to date have been Republicans? Since you're a student, maybe you're too young to remember that Bush II took us into Afghanistan and Iraq. Do some research and get back to us.
 
"

How is it that you figure the Democrats are going to do this when the only politicians who have gotten us into wars in Muslim countries to date have been Republicans? Since you're a student, maybe you're too young to remember that Bush II took us into Afghanistan and Iraq. Do some research and get back to us.

Hillary and Obama supported "freedom fighters" (ISIS and Al Qaida) in Libya and Syria.

If Republicans initiate anything related to violence then Democrats that are regular Joes' and Janes' that are voters will oppose it for the most part. But if Democrats initiate it then nearly all voting Democrats will blindly follow with as much independence of thought as a Charles Manson cult follower. And many Republicans that are part of the establishment will support the Democrats.

This is evidenced by Libya and Syria (originally planed under the administration of George W. Bush) and the demonizing of Russia and supporting a coup (filled with gangster and actual Nazis) in the Ukraine.

The invasion of Iraq was predicated on the same deception as Libya and Syria and Iran. They are not different. They are the same bag of cookies.

This makes the Democratic (liberal) leadership more dangerous because their followers believe any and all things they say, because the assumption is liberals are infallible. It's total blind faith.


General Wesley Clark is a Democrat. And even hearing this you still won't be able to logically connect the dots like 1 + 1 = 2 because as a religious Democrat one becomes as empty in the head, with as much blind faith, as a past follower of Charles Manson.


Gen Wesley Clark Reveals US Plan To Invade Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Lybia, Somalia, Sudan, And Iran


Like a Manson cult follower your holy, infallible leader can preach to you Russia is no threat (the religious Democrat blindly believes then), and then that same holy leader can turn around and preach to you Russia is America's greatest threat (and the religious Democrat blindly believes then).




So, if Democratic politicians state people in Azerbaijan are living in misery under a tyrannical government, and that the US must arm and fiance "moderate Muslims" that are freedom fighters, you average Democrat like a Manson cult member will totally believe this. Period. Story over with.
 
Hillary and Obama supported "freedom fighters" (ISIS and Al Qaida) in Libya and Syria.

If Republicans initiate anything related to violence then Democrats that are regular Joes' and Janes' that are voters will oppose it for the most part. But if Democrats initiate it then nearly all voting Democrats will blindly follow with as much independence of thought as a Charles Manson cult follower. And many Republicans that are part of the establishment will support the Democrats.

This is evidenced by Libya and Syria (originally planed under the administration of George W. Bush) and the demonizing of Russia and supporting a coup (filled with gangster and actual Nazis) in the Ukraine.

The invasion of Iraq was predicated on the same deception as Libya and Syria and Iran. They are not different. They are the same bag of cookies.

This makes the Democratic (liberal) leadership more dangerous because their followers believe any and all things they say, because the assumption is liberals are infallible. It's total blind faith.


General Wesley Clark is a Democrat. And even hearing this you still won't be able to logically connect the dots like 1 + 1 = 2 because as a religious Democrat one becomes as empty in the head, with as much blind faith, as a past follower of Charles Manson.

It amazes me that you can pack so much balderdash into a single post. Cheer up! The evil cult hasn't noticed Azerbaijan in the 10 years since the headscarf kerfuffel and is unlikely to do so in the near future. In the meantime maybe you should get busy and try to elect Republicans and others into office who will be immune to their inexplicably powerful mind control.
 
Back
Top Bottom