• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Conservative christian misogyny

As there are no reasons to buy into this god then it can be nothing else but a cult.
For you perhaps. Nope it could be a rather benign religon, or not a religon at all.

Saying that it is the womans right to make= the final decision does not mean the man does not have a say. Just that it is not his decision in the end.
Yes and in 1974 roe v wade recognized that right. So that's a **** example.


It's a performance issue ? That does sound like someone is judging on the basis of gender.
Only to people who want to see misogyny in everything. Women don't seem to want to go into many of the jobs men do. Perhaps they're dangerous, or require long hours.


That you neither can see or care is not relevant to the issue or the facts.
The pay gap is a myth not a fact. Roe v wade recognized the right of women to terminate their pregnancy. So nothing you said indicates that women are unequal and those are the facts.


Coming from one who neither see or care.
Someone who can't see imaginary things. And does not care about what a few religious people do.


No you just keep repeating it in order to avoid the information of disparity this lack of morality causes.
I wouldn't know what interest is have in that.

I simply take issue with people saying things are misogynistic when they aren't.

It does inhibits womens chances in business.
You have utterly failed to explain how a woman needs to go out with a man alone to further any business. So that's horse ****.
As i have already given links to and you ignore.
I don't need any ****ing links. There never comes an instance when a woman needs to be with a man alone for business, outside of prostitution.
 
For you perhaps. Nope it could be a rather benign religon, or not a religon at all.
Who says a cult cannot be benign?
Yes and in 1974 roe v wade recognized that right. So that's a **** example.
Laws do not mean that the morality of the situation is practiced. You cannot deny that many seek to over turn such laws.

Only to people who want to see misogyny in everything. Women don't seem to want to go into many of the jobs men do. Perhaps they're dangerous, or require long hours.
Which is not a reason to make it difficult for the ones who do want to get into those jobs which this false morality does.
The pay gap is a myth not a fact. Roe v wade recognized the right of women to terminate their pregnancy. So nothing you said indicates that women are unequal and those are the facts.
Disagree the arguments against pay inequality are never convincing while the many women who fight for equity are.
Someone who can't see imaginary things. And does not care about what a few religious people do.
Luckily then the argument is not based on your lack of caring.
I wouldn't know what interest is have in that.

I simply take issue with people saying things are misogynistic when they aren't.
But all you can say is that they are not.

You have utterly failed to explain how a woman needs to go out with a man alone to further any business. So that's horse ****. I don't need any ****ing links. There never comes an instance when a woman needs to be with a man alone for business, outside of prostitution.
Another example of you not bothering to read the links or even pay attention to what i have copied from those links. I have made the argument and you are doing nothing more than denying their existence rather than refuting them.
 
Who says a cult cannot be benign?
Who says religons are cults?

Laws do not mean that the morality of the situation is practiced. You cannot deny that many seek to over turn such laws.
It doesn't matter. People seek to make all sorts of laws. It diesnt mean they will.


Which is not a reason to make it difficult for the ones who do want to get into those jobs
Careers that are difficult shouldn't be made easy for women. That would be sexist.

Disagree the arguments against pay inequality are never convincing
Likely because you will never be convinced.

Luckily then the argument is not based on your lack of caring.
Or anything at all.

Another example of you not bothering to read the links or even pay attention to what i have copied from those links. I have made the argument and you are doing nothing more than denying their existence rather than refuting them.
I shouldn't have to read links. Misogyny is simple. If you need me too read cherry picked gobbledygook from the internet and can't put it in your own words, than you really aren't making an argument at all.

I don't want to read feminist claptrap. I'm not going to. Links shouldn't argue your point for you. You make a point you support it with links. All I've seen is a claim. I don't need to read your links because I don't buy your claim based on what I already know.

So if you have an argument to make, make it. If you just what to whine because I'm not reading your claptrap find another hobby.
 
Because their belief in their vows to their wives are so shallow that they will break them given any opportunity. Or the wife's faith in their husband is so shallow that they will believe any rumours or gossip said about them despite the lack of proof. Or because people are such a big bunch of prats that they will believe anything that discredits others. Let me know when i am getting close to the reasoning that upholds your view that you seem not to want to reveal with your doing nothing else but repeating the same **** over and over.

It would be a blend of all three. Mostly the last one. Especially as a political figure.

I don't understand how this isn't making sense to you.

Is it a popular viewpoint, no, but anyone putting forth a little effort could see the line of reasoning.
 
It would be a blend of all three. Mostly the last one. Especially as a political figure.

I don't understand how this isn't making sense to you.

Is it a popular viewpoint, no, but anyone putting forth a little effort could see the line of reasoning.

I see the line of reasoning. I do not see any reason to accept it. It does harm more than it does any good.
 
Back
Top Bottom