- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 42,744
- Reaction score
- 22,569
- Location
- Bonners Ferry ID USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I'd hold that, apart from the impossibility of being an enemy to what one holds as not existing, atheists trying to convert believers to their POV are showing an enmity towards the very same by expressing enmity towards their faith. Whether that's actually intended or not matters little, it's about the outcome.
Main reason why the only atheists I can show tolerance for are those that, unless actually invited by believers to act in the opposite manner, shut the hell up about it all.
That works in the opposite direction just as well.
Certain factions within do, that doesn't go for the whole faith. Yes, exactly the same point.
Muslim, Christian, Atheist, Pastafarian............doesn't matter who does it to "the others". If and when s/he does it to the others.
Where tolerance (religious or of whatever other make) is always about the freedom of the others, it cannot be a one-way street.
Unfortunately proselytizing is part of two of the monotheistic religions (of Judaism not so much, if at all) and will (and must) of necessity clash with the concept. Just as unfortunately a certain set of atheists put themselves into the same conundrum. All the more sad seeing how they're the ones faced with such a requirement the least.
Don't get me wrong here. My argument wasn't against Islam itself. I recognize that just like in any other aspect of life...no one or even no one group thinks the same. My comments were mainly just directed at what was said and showing how it could be viewed. I could care less about Islam itself. I see the idiots claiming that they're doing X "in the name of allah" to be as idiotic as when Christian claim to be doing Y "in the name of god". But then I've always viewed organized religion to be bunk so....maybe I'm biased? :shrug: