• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Teaching liberals why we have religion:[W:792, 2336]

Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

i see no evidence of literacy among liberals here. To them God is a magic man in the sky which is the cartoon version for illiterate children. Adults get Plato Augustine Luther etc. and see Christianity and the continuation of Greek philosophy

the cartoon version the old testament version
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

what??? you see any liberals supporting religion here????????????????????????????

you can relive in your gods all you want
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

the cartoon version the old testament version

Christ came after that. See why I mean about liberals being illiterate?
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

Christ came after that. See why I mean about liberals being illiterate?

If he was illiterate then he cannot read your posts and cannot respond. Do you understand now?
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

Christ came after that. See why I mean about liberals being illiterate?

Jesus supported slavery do you?
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

If he was illiterate then he cannot read your posts and cannot respond. Do you understand now?

obviously not talking literally but figuratively!!!! Do you understand???
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

obviously not talking literally but figuratively!!!! Do you understand???

illiterate
ɪˈlɪt(ə)rət/Submit
adjective
1.
unable to read or write.
"his parents were illiterate"
synonyms: unable to read or write, unlettered, analphabetic, functionally illiterate
"he was no illiterate peasant"
noun
1.
a person who is unable to read or write


Do you understand?
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

Christ came after that. See why I mean about liberals being illiterate?

so god was a cartoon villain before the new testament and then stopped after and so your not supposed to count that?
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

illiterate
ɪˈlɪt(ə)rət/Submit
adjective
1.
unable to read or write.
"his parents were illiterate"
synonyms: unable to read or write, unlettered, analphabetic, functionally illiterate
"he was no illiterate peasant"
noun
1.
a person who is unable to read or write


Do you understand?

hes got the reading part wrong but i cant write
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

obviously not talking literally but figuratively!!!! Do you understand???

that you just make stuff up that sounds clever in your head but dosent seem to be to most every one else?
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

no, and your point is?

If you think slavery is immoral then you disagree with the morals of Jesus.
Proving that morals didnt come from Jesus and morals are subjective
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

that you just make stuff up that sounds clever in your head but dosent seem to be to most every one else?

I dont think HE makes this stuff up, I think someone has been indoctrinating him with this nonsense
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

If you think slavery is immoral then you disagree with the morals of Jesus.
Proving that morals didnt come from Jesus and morals are subjective

You are wrong! Do you understand????
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

I dont think HE makes this stuff up, I think someone has been indoctrinating him with this nonsense

It does sound cultish.
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

If you think slavery is immoral then you disagree with the morals of Jesus.

We all disagree with the scientists of 200 years ago but that does not mean they didn't create the foundation on which modern science is built and on which our very lives today are sustained. Too complicated for you?
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

If you think slavery is immoral then you disagree with the morals of Jesus.

Jesus didn't say slavery was moral he merely accepted it given that most people were slaves then. Similarly we know Jefferson was perhaps the most moral force in human history after Jesus but he too was born with slaves in his house, and accepted it the way we all accept the language we speak at birth. One thing is certain, while Jesus and Jefferson accepted slavery, they did more to end it by a million times than any of us would have done.
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

Proving that morals didnt come from Jesus and morals are subjective

What you are trying to say is that all of modern morality and all of modern science didn't come Jesus and Aristotle respectively but that the foundation for modern morality and science did come from them.
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

Proving that morals didnt come from Jesus and morals are subjective

That Hitler liked to kill Jews doesn't mean that morals are subjective, but rather that Hitler lacked morals. Do you understand?
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

We all disagree with the scientists of 200 years ago but that does not mean they didn't create the foundation on which modern science is built and on which our very lives today are sustained. Too complicated for you?

that dose mean they are not perfect so we should discard their work that seems to be wrong

like the bits that sanction slavery or that say jebus was perfect

or that a god who would hurt you forever is good and just

or seems to be real
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

That Hitler liked to kill Jews doesn't mean that morals are subjective, but rather that Hitler lacked morals. Do you understand?

no that seems to be bull****

since you dont like to kill Jews and are counting on us to also not like it which if anything shows morals are subjective

You ever notice how you keep trying to appeal to are feelings every time you try and tell us why morality is not dependent on them?
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

We all disagree with the scientists of 200 years ago but that does not mean they didn't create the foundation on which modern science is built and on which our very lives today are sustained. Too complicated for you?

Scientific knowledge like morals change with time, glad you finally agree that morals are subjective
 
Last edited:
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

Jesus didn't say slavery was moral he merely accepted it given that most people were slaves then. Similarly we know Jefferson was perhaps the most moral force in human history after Jesus but he too was born with slaves in his house, and accepted it the way we all accept the language we speak at birth. One thing is certain, while Jesus and Jefferson accepted slavery, they did more to end it by a million times than any of us would have done.

Jesus and Jefferson accepted slavery and thus didn not have the same morals as we do
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

What you are trying to say is that all of modern morality and all of modern science didn't come Jesus and Aristotle respectively but that the foundation for modern morality and science did come from them.

Jesus isnt the foundation of morality
Morality is subjective
 
Back
Top Bottom