• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Teaching liberals why we have religion:[W:792, 2336]

Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

this is because they have absorbed religious morality without knowing it. Before religion we were Romans who went to the collusium to watch people being eaten alive for entertainment. When religion took over canon law became civil law. make sense now?

Romans had a religion.
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

trivial compared to an eternity in heaven with loved ones and a loving God besides you throughout life.
. Certainly not societal pressure to behave in specific ways is stronger then the potential of eternal life in the way people act day to day. Littering will be common where accepted and where society pressures people not to people won't as a means to remain accepted in the society. Going to church is in smaller towns an expected activity with social disapproval of people miss it. Given the small size friends and family will notice and disapprove. In cities few will notice and attendance is lower
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

. Certainly not societal pressure to behave in specific ways is stronger then the potential of eternal life in the way people act day to day.

society would not know what pressure to apply without religious teachings. Ever look at history? Before Christ there was only murder, not civilization as we know it today. Constantine made canon law civil law. I"m teaching you history in 10 seconds out of religious obligation.
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

why toward 0 rather than 200 million given that most humans are religious and don't murder as religion requires??
the Old Testament required the stoning of adulter's yet most people were against it. Religion adapted to accommodate people's general goodness towards not killing.

I will say that in general with or without religion the vast majority of people are good those
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

Good grief. :doh

You don't have to be religious in order to have morals and empathy for other people.

It does not hurt to have God in your corner

Even for the libs who already know everything about everything
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

society would not know what pressure to apply without religious teachings. Ever look at history? Before Christ there was only murder, not civilization as we know it today. Constantine made canon law civil law.
Recall the
Hammurabi code written before Judaism and long before Christ. It covered a mass number of laws I expect also including one regarding murder
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

society would not know what pressure to apply without religious teachings. Ever look at history? Before Christ there was only murder, not civilization as we know it today. Constantine made canon law civil law. I"m teaching you history in 10 seconds out of religious obligation.

But this is a ludicrous statement: " Before Christ there was only murder, not civilization as we know it today." This isn't history, and it isn't defensible.
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

the point is 90% of muslims use religion as a source of love and only a tiny fraction use it to kill.

That's only because they selectively read from their holy book, just like Christians do. The book specifically commands killing, they just ignore that part.
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

so then why so afraid to tell us where morals would come from if not from religion??

Empathy, the human experience, tradition, cultural values.
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

Without it you can just as easily kill someone as love him. Simple enough?

Tha happens every day, what's your point?
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

society would not know what pressure to apply without religious teachings. Ever look at history? Before Christ there was only murder, not civilization as we know it today. Constantine made canon law civil law. I"m teaching you history in 10 seconds out of religious obligation.

Yeah, Mesopotamia, the Greeks, the Egyptians, the Romans, all just drooling cave dwellers.
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

Without it you can just as easily kill someone as love him. Simple enough?

Uh.... it was established a while ago that you could have ethics/morality without religion. By Socrates, I believe.
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

society would not know what pressure to apply without religious teachings. Ever look at history? Before Christ there was only murder, not civilization as we know it today. Constantine made canon law civil law. I"m teaching you history in 10 seconds out of religious obligation.

Ever hear of the Crusades?
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

so then why so afraid to tell us where morals would come from if not from religion??

My 'morals' - I prefer ethics - come from instincts, (thank you genes) reason and plain common sense. It really is so much better to live where people are nice to each other. The irreligious are every bit as likely to do selfless acts to help strangers as the pious. Go on James - fall into a river near me and I will pull you out. Promise.
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

Without it you can just as easily kill someone as love him. Simple enough?

1.) millions of "liberals" are religious so your thread title is retarded and biased
2.) billions of deaths have happened at the hands of religion/religious people, further making your OP retarded and biased
Simple enough LMAO :D

sincerely
and independant christian
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

trivial compared to an eternity in heaven with loved ones and a loving God besides you throughout life.

Let me guess. You're at Liberty University and you need to get 10 apologetics emails published on an internet forum in order to get your Masters Degree?
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

very few kill in the name of God as opposed to those who love in the name of God.

You are obviously very history deficient.
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

what?? murder rate is 20,000 it might be 200 million without the religious injunction: thou shall not murder. Do you understand.

Congratulations! You have just committed the worse combination of Slippery Slop and Correlation/Causation fallacies, in the history of the site!
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

very few kill in the name of God as opposed to those who love in the name of God.

Its a pretty well accepted rule of thumb that far more people have been killed in the name of religion than have ever been saved by it
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

what?? murder rate is 20,000 it might be 200 million without the religious injunction: thou shall not murder. Do you understand.

What utter nonsense. The Scandinavian countries have some of the lowest crime/homicide rates in the world yet the great bulk of their populations are atheist
 
Re: Teaching liberals why we have religion:

trivial compared to an eternity in heaven with loved ones and a loving God besides you throughout life.

Oh boy :roll:

So you only do good because you think you'll get pie in the sky when you die ? And I suppose the rest of us unbelievers are all going to burn in hell right ?
 
Back
Top Bottom