• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Is the muslim phophet Muhammed a pedophile?

Is the muslim phophet Muhammed a pedophile?


  • Total voters
    31
Do yourself a favor, learn the definition of the word falsifiability and why the default position for any hypothesis that lacks falsifiability is the antitheses and then you can talk about logical fallacies.

Do yourself a favor. Learn about asymmetrical burden of proof and the definitions of logical fallacies. You obviously understand neither. Once you do, get back to me, and we can discuss how you committed the appeal to ignorance logical fallacy and how you can avoid it in the future.
 
Do yourself a favor. Learn about asymmetrical burden of proof and the definitions of logical fallacies. You obviously understand neither. Once you do, get back to me, and we can discuss how you committed the appeal to ignorance logical fallacy and how you can avoid it in the future.

Well considering that you don't even understand an appeal to ignorance fallacy and why it doesn't apply to the current topic I think its you who needs to study up on it. Once again the automatic default position is that god does not exists because the hypothesis "god does exist" is an unfalsifiable positive statement backed by 0 evidence. In other words get freaking educated.
 
Last edited:
Well considering that you don't even understand an appeal to ignorance fallacy and why it doesn't apply to the current topic I think its you who needs to study up on it. Once again the automatic default position is that god does not exists because the hypothesis "god does exist" is an unfalsifiable positive statement backed by 0 evidence. In other words get freaking educated.

Still trying to save your dead position by demonstrating that you have little or no understanding of debate concepts. It's really sad watching you not grasping the concept of asymmetrical burden of proof, the concept of the appeal to ignorance logical fallacy, and how you committed the latter because you don't understand the former. I'd suggest you read up on it so you could understand it, but I can see that you are so entrenched in your position, that learning that you were wrong when you DID read up on it, could cause some sort of breakdown. Denial and avoidance... your name is Agent Ferris.
 
Still trying to save your dead position by demonstrating that you have little or no understanding of debate concepts. It's really sad watching you not grasping the concept of asymmetrical burden of proof, the concept of the appeal to ignorance logical fallacy, and how you committed the latter because you don't understand the former. I'd suggest you read up on it so you could understand it, but I can see that you are so entrenched in your position, that learning that you were wrong when you DID read up on it, could cause some sort of breakdown. Denial and avoidance... your name is Agent Ferris.

What's said is your lack of understanding of falsifiability. By your logic (or lack there of) there is a burden of proof that lies upon the one negating the existence of an invisible pink unicorn.
 
What's said is your lack of understanding of falsifiability. By your logic (or lack there of) there is a burden of proof that lies upon the one negating the existence of an invisible pink unicorn.

What's sad is that you are stubbornly staying with an incorrect position, even though it has been thoroughly debunked with the concept of asymmetrical burden of proof. I guess you are going to rethink how you address this issue, now, since these tactic have been shown to not be legitimate.
 
Today the guy could be 100 % charged with pedophilia and sentenced to lifetime.

Muhammed - The Pedophile

That's wonderful.

And meaningless.

The vast majority of our founding fathers would be in jail for decades because of slave ownership, and one President possibly getting the death penalty for having killed someone.
 
Back
Top Bottom