• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Homosexuality sinful and/or unnatural?

Is homosexuality wrong and/or unnatural?


  • Total voters
    128
No.

more words.

Don't reply with another gay Berlin video....


So it is quite possible the "natural" state of humankind is bi-sexual.
 
Sure, because it happens in nature is not a valid explanation for why it happens in humans. We can only assume that certain behaviors are instances of homosexual activity based on observation, when in fact the behavior could be non sexual to that actor.

As far as logical fallacies go, this should help.

But since one of the definitions of "nature" is "occurring in nature", his post is actually not a fallacy.
 
But since one of the definitions of "nature" is "occurring in nature", his post is actually not a fallacy.

Not when it comes to looking for justification for human behavior.

and if I said "Blue" in a gay thread,

you'd say "No! Green!"
 
I'm not bisexual.

Dood! If you had to struggle with a choice, if you weren't sure which way and what you are a bisexual. No one here is saying that is bad or wrong. In fact, most everyone here is saying it is just as normal as being hetero or gay. We aren't making judgements, you are. It's OK to come out on a board. We accept you.
 
Then what makes you think hormones affected the formation of our sexuality in utero?

The influx of hormones from the mother, not your own personal hormones.

I don't look at it that way. I don't see a reason to change longstanding tradition for what may be a choice. I also support civil unions that offer the same protections as marriage.

But what if it's not a choice? Why should people have to put their lives on hold for evidence that really doesn't matter in the SSM debate. And also, why should the tradition of one man, one woman only marriage be upheld? For what reasons other than it's a tradition? Why should same sex marries not be recognized by the states, when there are families that would benefit from it, and what harm would be caused to existing marriages by allowing people they probably don't know to get married?
 
Dood! If you had to struggle with a choice, if you weren't sure which way and what you are a bisexual. No one here is saying that is bad or wrong. In fact, most everyone here is saying it is just as normal as being hetero or gay. We aren't making judgements, you are. It's OK to come out on a board. We accept you.

Who said I struggled with a choice? Now you're just being dishonest, Snicket.
 
Do you believe you have some hormonal imbalance in relation to straight females?

This makes an assumption that the hormone balance of strait people is superior.
 
This makes an assumption that the hormone balance of strait people is superior.

No, I'm just asking if there was a difference...I could have worded it better.
 
No, I'm just asking if there was a difference...I could have worded it better.

Yeah, if that was your intent, you could have. Not sure if gays have a different level of hormones, but there is some evidence of distinct physical differences.
 
Yeah, if that was your intent, you could have. Not sure if gays have a different level of hormones, but there is some evidence of distinct physical differences.

From what i understand there is no hormonal difference between straight and gay for that reason alone. You mean things like gay guys have bigger penises? That kind of thing?
 
Back
Top Bottom